Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

what do you all think of this rear bar.. i like it, loox r34 style. some reason the wine red makes it look cheap and maby the mesh is bad on this one :D

R33 GTS AB REAR BAR..

Eew, I didnt know Droid made kits for Skylines.

No offence to the owner of the car if they are reading this, but that rear end makes baby jesus cry.

What do ppl think of the veilside with gtr wing

hey, is this your car?.. i dont think it looks that bad, if it didnt have so many plat parts droping down opersite the exaust, i think it may look good, that loox alot beta from behind then some cars with gtr wings.. for sure.. soe look ugly with there kit, and i dont think this meets ugly, loox unique.. but, i tink that may be a fibre glass gtr wing?, may be why its not looking the best :(

Edited by seriesII

na its not my car, iv got a gtr wing but having a problem finding a good rear bar that will look good with the wing. Iv got a trust frount bar and eye lids just need skirts and a rear bar as im not a fan of my gtr skirts and pods.

Don't have a pic atm but mine has a type m front with the lower grilles taken out to view the cooler better, 400R side skirts and rear bar with a stealth wing. When I got the car, many years ago now, was the only one in adelaide i had seen with the stealth wing but now heaps of skyline's have 'em.

Thats why i dident go stealth wing to many ppl have them and i like the look of the gtr wing(not to high and not to low) just looks so sexy

i second that!.. :D .. stealth wing?, are you talking the wing that is on a 93 till 94 series 1 skyline?

ahh, the stealth wing is the aftermarket boot lip mate... not one of my favourites :laugh:

post-26327-1172322157.jpg

deriq.

that rear wing is ugly as

hmmmm. thanx for thatk, i was some times thinking the stealth wing was the one on a series 1 gtst r33.. hehe.. so thats what they call that wing.. hmmm.. no offence, not my flavor at all, good for drifting a guess tho :P, but no good for quatar mile races :P .. each to there own tho, its good everyone has different flavors, thats what makes this world with so many options :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thank you, 100% the intent. New coils were due and the 17" sixers look/feel loads better than the stock wheels. The aero options are so spot on.   Thanks for the warm welcome, all!
    • 98 r34 gtt Been rocking my latest setup and car running like never before. Have put a good 200 miles on it since all the latest changes and additions. everything is dialed in and have been driving it a bunch.   However, all a sudden last weekend as soon as I pushed throttle passed 4k and the engine stumbles, (slow or fast acceleration) hesitates and doesn’t go above 4100 or so, like a misfire. Everything else seems fine. I had a “good” set of coil packs that I removed from car when I first got it when I changed them over to new coils. I swapped out current ones for those, but no change. I also changed the plugs, no change. Seems to rev over 4 when out of gear with no load just fine no “misfire”, but as soon as its in gear with a load of any kind, it “misfires” as soon as rpm drop back below 4 k it runs perfectly, smooth, starts, restarts and drives fine as long as I keep it below 4 k while in gear. All readings look fine, no CEL   Any idea as to what could all a sudden cause an issue when pushing rpms passed 4 k?
    • When you say your cams are 272/262 is that 272in and 262ex?
    • We're arguing semantics. I am saying 45 accel and a 55 deccel ramp are "2 ways". Even a 45 degree ramp and an 89 degree ramp is "2 ways", because it is literally... two ways. The cusco 55/30 ramp is a 2 way. It's two ways. I get it though - in normal nomenclature a "2 way" would be 45/45 or 55/55 or 60/60 i.e the same locking in both directions. And something like 45/65 would be considered "1.5 way". I would then say if we're getting into the nitty gritty then every locking diff is a "2 way" diff and we should not speak in 1.5, or 2 ways but ramp angles instead. Which ofc if one of those ramp angles is 90deg, that side is not doing any locking. :p So Nismo don't obviously sell 3 things. The fact of the matter that they only sell two items really goes to show that there's a 2 way and a "1,5 way" which is really a 1 way. I believe the actual lockup for the 'adjustability' of the GT pro is really just setting preload for when the ramps actually start locking up. It's not changing how much 'wayness' there is. It is (somehow) horribly explained. People just buy whatever diff and go "locks up good bruh" and that's what ends up on socials forever.  
×
×
  • Create New...