Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok guys, i have a mate that has spent nearly $40,000 on his RB25. It has a bit of shit done to it this is the list

Areas pistons

Cunningham rods

Metal head gasket

Head work

Deaek bottom end and bored

Blue print and balanced

N1 oil pump

N1 bearing kit

GT 35-40 garret turbo

Massive FMIC

Custom plenum and throttle body

MSD DIS4 ignition system

Ltx 12 microtech.

Now it was dynoed at 360 rwhp at 19 psi, i thought with all that work it would make at least 450rwhp plus.

I notice alot of other Skylines with not much work done coming very close to 360 rwhp.

Is it time for a new tuner or is that it.

What do you think.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/155778-should-it-make-more-power/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

sounds like your mate has been ripped off. Not by the amount of power he is making, but for the small list of parts you have shown. I hope that $40k covers a hole bunch of other things. :P

sounds like your mate has been ripped off. Not by the amount of power he is making, but for the small list of parts you have shown. I hope that $40k covers a hole bunch of other things. :P

Well yeah thats what i think, thats a shit load of money.

But alot of work has gone into it.

There is not much more.

Or forgot these.

ARP stud kit.

Coil pack

1100kg exedy twin plate

1.15 A/R exhaust housing.

Mate it adds up pretty quick.

Labour was a few thousand.

Edited by subzeroR33

Head, Cams, valve springs, fuel, compression, leakdown, exhaust, cam timing, catalytic converter, tune and................ the dyno. What are others doing on the same dyno?

Try another tuner see what they think may be up with it....

Head, Cams, valve springs, fuel, compression, leakdown, exhaust, cam timing, catalytic converter, tune and................ the dyno. What are others doing on the same dyno?

Try another tuner see what they think may be up with it....

It still has standard cams.

But i think it should be better than 360rwhp.

Then they usually do cams, the plenum possibly exhaust manifold already done.

Modifications done in stages. When everything has basically been done at once its just too difficult to know whats wrong with the car.

It may simple come down to the tuner, a stuffed cat, a crappy exhaust. Who knows, we don't because maybe you don't either.

If you were the owner you could say ... yes its running a decat, 3.5" straight through muffler this that etc..

lol $40,000k? for only 360rwhp?

HAHAHAHAH your mate has been owned big time..... does he not know how to do anything himself?

If he had 40,000k to spend on an engine he should of bought a twin turbo jza80 supra and spent the money to have an 800hp monster but each to his own i guess....

I have spent like 2k on my car for engine mods and am making in the vicinity of 260rwhp.

I know that to go up i must get a new turbo, computer etc but i would still want to come out f*cking short of 40,000.....

I hope that 40,000 inlcudes bodykits, wheels etc etc....

lol $40,000k? for only 360rwhp?

HAHAHAHAH your mate has been owned big time..... does he not know how to do anything himself?

The parts listed are a fair cry from 40k. Doesnt even come close to knocking over 20k

I'd say the figure of 40k was including things like rims, suspension, body kits etc etc etc etc.

But as cubes said (i did not have the time earlier), they are a LOT of things missing.

Even the turbo spec iteself.

All thats been listed is about 1/2, and its not enough detail for the items that are there, let alone whats missing

Maybe the FMIC has pressure drop, maybe the head gasket a whopper and its dropped the comp ratio substancially meaning mroe boost would be required.

Subzero, get your mate to signup and give the FULL detail and history, no-one can really help unless there is basically a thesis on what parts are there, whats been done, whats been tried.

What has not been tried etc etc. Its a lot more detailed that just listing some of the parts that have been used.

Simply saying a car isnt performing and asking for answers is like asking how long is a piece of string.

Ps. im moving this to Forced Induction.

its a 3540. bleh.

cams and headwork. also a plenum that doesnt work.

ive a stock 26 with a t04z. only makes 410hp atw. on 20 pound lol.

cams and headwork. and posibly the ebay exhaust manifold.

where as my old 26 with mild cams and portwork made 440hp atw with a t04e on 1 bar. with a exhaust manifold i made.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...