Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

as far as 10 k rpm going to take a lot of internal work and balencing to get it there if it can make it. look around a few gtrs have high revs up to around 9000 but i duno about 10000, as for the supercharger you will need the charger with the clutch attached and the pully, wiring for it if its electromagnitic with a switch any electro switch would do, custom mounts, a longer custom size belt somewhere easy to measure and buy, then the supercharger outlet manifold could be supplied mabye have to be custom to get it into a standard round intake size, then you would need a cooler, all the piping work, some sort of pressure releace valve, fuel pump and injectors and ecu to support it

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

to have a charger and a high rev limiter without a cooler is not a good idea

street commodores had there vp commo drag car that ran high 12's with a no-intercooled turbo'd 3.8 v6, and as it got to high rpms, the inlet charge temp got sooo high that it was leaning out too much and losing power (and this is with a full replacement ecu that was dumping mass fuel at high rpms)

to enable a rb to rev to 10k rpm, u would need to shit loads of work.

you would need a rb26 block for the internal strengthening that its got, lightweight pistons, lightweight conrods, tightest clearances ever (to help it rev as it wont wiggle around much, and to retain combustion pressure), lightweight crankshaft, heavily ported and polished head, light cams, and everything would need to be balanced to an inch of its life, ATI harmonic balancer, no aircon (cant sacrifice power steering :ninja: ), and it goes on

its far too much work for a conventional street engine and too xpensive to warrant it.

ohh, and the reason that the AE86 in initial D can rev to 11k rpm is because its a 4 cyl. 4cyls and all variants (ie v8's) have a 90 degree firing sequence and are harmonically stable allowing it to rev high without shaking itself apart, unlike v6, I6's and v12's, that have a 33.3 degree firing sequence which is not harmonically stable and the higher revs it gets to, the higher the chance of it shaking itself apart

hey check out this old post for like a year ago got a pic of someone who supercharged his na but its a way overbord set-up looks like its got a water-air intercooler and lots of crazy pipes

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...hl=supercharger

i promised twincharging info

new one for me i found out vw twincharged car they thinking of bringing out

http://paultan.org/archives/2005/08/27/vol...en-super-turbo/

and nissans MA09ERT engine

in the 1989 Nissan March Superturbo

http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/id/?id=132715

thats the base info on where to find info you want to do more you all know how to use google lol or as a certain user always says use the search button

Dear all skyliners,

Its me again the due with lots of questions..... does anybody know how what mods 2 get a n/a skyline to rev past 10k rpm... if anione is familiar with the cartoon or movie Initial D inside the legendary AE86 did 11k rpm mod..?

cheers guys :D

The 86 wasn't a 'mod' as such, the engine was replaced with a Group A race motor. So yes, a group a engine ftw!

tto enable a rb to rev to 10k rpm, u would need to shit loads of work.

you would need a rb26 block for the internal strengthening that its got, lightweight pistons, lightweight conrods, tightest clearances ever (to help it rev as it wont wiggle around much, and to retain combustion pressure), lightweight crankshaft, heavily ported and polished head, light cams, and everything would need to be balanced to an inch of its life, ATI harmonic balancer, no aircon (cant sacrifice power steering :D ), and it goes on

its far too much work for a conventional street engine and too xpensive to warrant it.

ohh, and the reason that the AE86 in initial D can rev to 11k rpm is because its a 4 cyl. 4cyls and all variants (ie v8's) have a 90 degree firing sequence and are harmonically stable allowing it to rev high without shaking itself apart, unlike v6, I6's and v12's, that have a 33.3 degree firing sequence which is not harmonically stable and the higher revs it gets to, the higher the chance of it shaking itself apart

spot on buddy.

i've had a quick look into revs before. as most of you would know the best way to make power from NA is with revs. it costs a bucketload!!

even with an ATI balancer (which isnt really that cheap) - it still is a "bandaid" type fix. with all the knifeblading the crank and balancing, hypereuretic pistons, re-enforced block, etc etc... you are better off starting with a more solid base.

you will be pretty much replicating what manufacturers do over a period of years - R&D. and it's not going to be cheap.

also by having a car that makes power in revs, it's not going to be practical on the street - you'd pretty much end up with a dedicated track monster.

u'd burn through a clutch in no time, as ud have to keep riding it in stop start traffic as ur engine would have nothing below 3 - 4.5k rpm

DirtGarage sat in the HKS drag skyline, and took photos of it - it runs an ATI balancer, but even that wouldnt get to 10krpm

hey guys.

http://www.performanceforums.com/forums/sh...ght=contraption

any specific questions not answered in that thread, let me know. it's a ripper of an engine. waiting for a stronger gearbox before upping the boost.

p.s. the biggest drama with the RB25's is that the harmonic balancer doesn't run any wide belts, and has no threads in the end face for mounting a billet drive pulley. so it is not easy to bolt a pulley onto the end like you can with the RB30 balancer. the only other easy option is to run an extended belt off the 4?PK drive for the p/s pump to drive the blower, but you're in for a bit of belt slip there unless you can get the wrap up near 100%

Edited by StockyMcStock

unarmed skyline thanks for all the info mate.. having a look at the supercharge skyline i'm getting a headache too many lines and pips... does it have to be like that.? i was thinking of a much cleaner look possibly out of sight if possible you know the cops they dun know much but they pretend to... and try to do u for things like that. if u get wat i mean.?

tom 9999 your question is never stupid mate duno just ask i'm sure ppl will help a fellow skyliner, yes its doable sumfin i'm looking at and from the threads there has been a few examples.

Unarmed skyline, is there a certain procedure on which app you have 2 install 1st 4 it 2 work ie turbo first or sc first or its personal preference.. knowing that the sc is goin 2 be hell of alot of work i was think turbo then detailed plannin then sc.. wat u think.? :sorcerer:

i think in that pic he was running a water to air intercooler, which adds to the pipework over teh engine a bit

also with the sc is that (usually) the entrance is at the back of the sc, which means, often, really tricky pipework anyway

stupid question, but my mate said you can have a supercharger and a turbocharger on together is this possible.

yes its possible, not easy, not cheap, and hard to tune, but possible...

and if done correctly, the outcome is insane...

ill get some pics of the juggernaut (supercharged/turbocharged supra) in progress when i go to the shop tomorrow...

please note, thats my nickname for it...

its running this turbo, and the supercharger will be doing about 10-12 pounds of boost... the little one is the old one...

WORLDS FASTEST HAT?! :nyaanyaa:

img0523yg4.jpg

hey best way to run a twin charger system is with the charger then into the turbo, but if your going about doing it over time you could get the turbo all set up then upgrade to twin charger l8er

^^^ cant you go to a RB30 harmonic balancer then? i thought all rb balances were essentially the same, and any balancer from any engine would fit?

i am absolutely unsure on that. i wouldn't take the decision lightly either because the different balancers are designed for different capacity engines.

ps i guess nobody clicked on the link in my first post so here you go:

SV100562.jpg

IMG_1109.jpg

SV100533.jpg

SV100571.jpg

yes 303rwhp on 9psi :O

Edited by StockyMcStock

Hey DRD-00F that is one big turbo but does that thing really goin 2 fit in the supra.? but look forward 2 seeing your pics on that supra, just wondering does the supra have more engine space or does the skyline have more.?

StockyMcStock thats just supercharge rite.? no turbo yeah.. that sc looks like a sc-14 but it also looks like the kompressor supercharge i saw on ebay... thats pretty impressive power for an sc tho but duno how much mods he had 2 do 2 get to this power...

paulr33 just thought maybe reving harder could catch up a bit on the shifting on turbo cars, but u r rite rev hard doesnt mean more power but unless u reali mod it out properli but i just thought sometimes thinking of the normal way of power is a change might find some kewl ideas..

Anyone trust e-sc..? i'm thinkin of giving it a ago imagine e-sc + sc + T man i think i'm starting to go mad here........ :laugh:

yeah it fits... the bottom end was in on the weekend, along with the turbo and the custom exhaust manifold... ill get some pics of it for you when i go home this arvo...

we werent sure if it was gunna fit... we thought it was gunna need a power bulge in the bonnet, giving away its secret... but it seems to fit... barely...

I have to be scarce about the details on this car, cause its supposed to be a secret of sorts :( but its taking so damn long i cant help it! i cant wait til we get it dyno'd :laugh:

Do you mean electric supercharger?

Hey Traditimeour, yeah thats it electric supercharger give around "3-4psi boost" some state on the website but its quite cheap for that type of price i think.. ani sugguestions or anione have tried these kinda products.? oh if anione was looking at the "turbonator" dun bother i got it its just a metal fin like the spool on the turbo that just sits after you air filter meter that makes this kinda swirl to make more wind at first it did work but i dun think its worth while.....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...