Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nathan weisel has one in his 26 powered 32 gtst, seems to be nice and responsive. i will be running either K5-660R or twin T517Z's..... cant make up my mind.... both sitting here waiting on my decision.

Edited by URAS
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158731-gt35r-on-rb26/#findComment-2948264
Share on other sites

The power output of a 3582r is just over 600hp, alot of people say they are 650hp but its not true. Garrett themselves rate the turbo as capable of 400rwkws on a 3litre engine, typically 25 and 26 30dets. Thats about 530whp or roughly 600bhp give or take 10-15hp.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158731-gt35r-on-rb26/#findComment-2948335
Share on other sites

Ive done one with a .63 ex housing to make it responsive, as it is a street car. Heaps of workshops said it wouldnt work. Anyhow standard motor, pfc, 550cc inj. 309rwkw 16 psi. 330ish at 18psi, havn't adjusted cam timing yet, so more to come. Nice and responsive, comes on at 3500ish, been running for over a year. I dont know about 400rwkw, unless the motor has cams, headwork etc, but 360 i recon no worries. Wont work hahaha

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158731-gt35r-on-rb26/#findComment-2948403
Share on other sites

This turbo would be pushing sh*t uphill to do a +400RWKW, I done one a few years back with a 1.02 rear housing with a modified front, motor was built from sump to cam covers, and it produced, wait for it.

A pissy 470RWHP on 98 fuel

But to pay due when it is dserve, the turbo was on song for the most part of the rev band and nice flat torqur curve.

Disclaimer: I donot claim to be the great car mods, or have absolute knowledge of everything mechanical.The results are from personal experiences and may not be reduplicate at a later date or by 3rd party

HAHA

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158731-gt35r-on-rb26/#findComment-2948478
Share on other sites

Todd wilkes Gicottoll omade 1200 rwhp with two of these on 18psi, but he had a full house 5.8 spinning them with a modified 1.06 ex housing.(The engine flowed soo well that the car was going over 15psi horsepower heroes limit with both 50mm exwastegates valves removed, thats why we machined out the ex housings)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158731-gt35r-on-rb26/#findComment-2948558
Share on other sites

Ye, you'll be pushing the limits for 400rwkw i reckon using PULP.

Thats firmly in the t04z territory of the 400-440rwkw marker.

A GT35 would sit around the 340-380 mark comfortably with good response.

Depends on the motor and all things associated of course as to which end the number will sit etc etc

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158731-gt35r-on-rb26/#findComment-2948699
Share on other sites

one rb25 i did made 456 rwhp -335rwkw @25psi on 98 octane pulp fuel

it was a stock rb25 with tomei poncams and splitfire coilpacks.

that was with 1.06 rear, it hit full boost at 4500rpm and was very street unfriendly.

the .82 rear would be sweet

Edited by extreme turbo manifolds
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158731-gt35r-on-rb26/#findComment-2948765
Share on other sites

There's a few here in SA that have basically just been bolted on.

It appears ~20psi makes a shade over 300rwkw.

I'd assume the difference between 20psi making 340-380rwkw and 20psi making a shade over 300rwkw is nice exhaust manifolds, plenums and a decent set of cams.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158731-gt35r-on-rb26/#findComment-2948787
Share on other sites

well im hoping for 400 in ours with the gt3582r...had 370 before with the gt30..so another 30 kws shouldnt be too far outta reach with this new motor. I reckon its possible. I guess time will tell though. However it will be definetely right on the limit, thats for sure.

Edited by r33_racer
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158731-gt35r-on-rb26/#findComment-2948793
Share on other sites

370rwkw from a GT30... on PULP?

If so what boost levels/setup were you running to achive that? Must have been a fair lean on it either way.

Everyone else here with a GT30 gets around the 300rwkw with 18-20psi.

To add another 70rwkw is to put it... a fark load more :O

I was 24psi on 104 octane and made 369rwkw. The fuel made the difference there however.

Would not have come close on PULP. 330rwkw max with some ~23-25psi based on what we saw which slots perfectly into other peoples results such as bigcarl and a few others of late

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158731-gt35r-on-rb26/#findComment-2948847
Share on other sites

r31nismoid if you followed the rb30 thread a little more you may have noticed it around there abit. Ive spoken about it several times and so have others.

In our racecar we run a 25/30det with a fair bit done to it. Head has a slight port n polish same as everyone else normally, tomei 256 poncams, 6boost mani, greddy mani, 850cc sards, powerfc, the gt30 .82 with a 3" zorst, no muffles cat, just straight through, 48mm progate, ati dampener, 8.3:1 comp, acl mls hg, water/meth injection, 8krpm.

On shell 100 pulp on 19psi (i think 1.3bar) we made 370rwkws and 385rwkws on 22psi 1.5bar..knock was too high though so we kept it at the 370. The water/meth injection added an extra 50kws, a heap more timing was added for the extra power. Before the water/meth we were only at 320rwkws on 17 or 18psi cant recall now.

Edited by r33_racer
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158731-gt35r-on-rb26/#findComment-2948974
Share on other sites

Cheers :O

I thought it wouldnt have just been PULP alone. Good results thats for sure.

It would help others if you stated that each time you quote the power figure too (would have stopped me asking hehe)

Like i do with mine if it was PULP/104/whatever etc

I dont remember all threads, all posts mate. I read a lot of stuff each week

RB30 thread, im only upto page 60 or so at the moment... another 200 to go (im cleaning it up)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158731-gt35r-on-rb26/#findComment-2949004
Share on other sites

my apologies mate...its abit annoying having to state everything everytime....so i just try to cut to the chase. But with something like that in this circumstance i prob should state those things which might keep people wondering as to how that power was achieved.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158731-gt35r-on-rb26/#findComment-2949040
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...