Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Quick question for the more technically inclined:

I'm putting a HKS2535 onto my rb20 tomorrow...I know that ball bearing turbos usually require a restrictor in the oil feed...my question is since the the stock turbo on the rb20/25 is ball bearing anyway...will i still need an oil feed restrictor?

I'm using a braided line that came with the turbo and I'm unsure of what the internal diameter of that line should be...would the standard holes in the banjo bolts be enough to restrict the oil flow for the new turbo?

Cheers...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158764-another-oil-feedrestrictor-question/
Share on other sites

Quick question for the more technically inclined:

I'm putting a HKS2535 onto my rb20 tomorrow...I know that ball bearing turbos usually require a restrictor in the oil feed...my question is since the the stock turbo on the rb20/25 is ball bearing anyway...will i still need an oil feed restrictor?

I'm using a braided line that came with the turbo and I'm unsure of what the internal diameter of that line should be...would the standard holes in the banjo bolts be enough to restrict the oil flow for the new turbo?

Cheers...

The oil flow restrictor is in the inlet fitting in the turbo core.

Supply pipework size is irrelevant, ie; the restrictor is smaller than the smallest pipework you could buy.

:O Cheers :woot:

The oil flow restrictor is in the inlet fitting in the turbo core.

Supply pipework size is irrelevant, ie; the restrictor is smaller than the smallest pipework you could buy.

:( Cheers :)

SK is this the same for the garrett GT series turbochargers? I assume so. ALso in regards to the inlet line, I was thinking it ocould be a good idea to make it curl like the factory does IIRC, or would that restrict the flow of the oil and starve the turbo then? (I think Nismoid did this on his RB25)

cheers

-Jez

SK is this the same for the garrett GT series turbochargers? I assume so. ALso in regards to the inlet line, I was thinking it ocould be a good idea to make it curl like the factory does IIRC, or would that restrict the flow of the oil and starve the turbo then? (I think Nismoid did this on his RB25)

cheers

-Jez

The oil is under pressure, you can't restrict the flow pigtailing it. You can only stop/restrict the flow if you kink it. If you use braided line there is no need to pigtail it, the pigtail is only there to allow some flexibility [given that it is a hard pipe ie steel and inflexible] for vibration between the block and the turbo. A braided line is already flexible so caters for this.

I would avoid having the hose to short - a tight fit, but I would also avoid having the hose too long, allowing it to flop around and wear on other parts. I would think that if it was around 50mm longer than a straight line fit it would be ideal.

Excuse my dumbness, WTF is -3 hose? And it still doesnt answer my question, does the garrett have a restrictre built in? :P

3mm ID

If its a late model [modern] unit ball bearing then yes it should

GCG supplied me with a restrictor that pushed into my -4 line where it screws into the block.

but the hole in it was only about 1mm.

i would check with them if i was you. tell them the no. on your turbo and they will tell you if you need one or not.

the restrictor looks similar to a head oil feed restrictor.

to me 3mm sounds like you dont have a retrictor at all.

But its supposed to be in the turbo? Not the block?

Does this mean you can't see it? I've got my GT3076 in my hand and the only restriction I see is the 3mm hole/seat that the banjo bolt tightens into/onto. I don't see any other smaller hole.

The bolt shown above would not work, the brass insert would be sitting on the seat, not ver it.

Not sure how applicable it is to the RB's.

GCG appear to believe it is?

GCG supplied me with a restrictor that pushed into my -4 line where it screws into the block.

but the hole in it was only about 1mm.

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...r/faqs.html#t16

Ball-bearing turbochargers can benefit from the addition of an oil restrictor, as most engines deliver more pressure than a ball bearing turbo requires. The benefit is seen in improved boost response due to less windage of oil in the bearing. In addition, lower oil flow further reduces the risk of oil leakage compared to journal-bearing turbochargers. Oil pressure entering a ball-bearing turbocharger needs to be between 40 psi and 45 psi at the maximum engine operating speed. For many common passenger vehicle engines, this generally translates into a restrictor with a minimum of 0.040" diameter orifice upstream of the oil inlet on the turbocharger center section. Again, it is imperative that the restrictor be sized according to the oil pressure characteristics of the engine to which the turbo is attached. Always verify that the appropriate oil pressure is reaching the turbo.

The use of an oil restrictor can (but not always) help ensure that you have the proper oil flow/pressure entering the turbocharger, as well as extract the maximum performance.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...