Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Quick question for the more technically inclined:

I'm putting a HKS2535 onto my rb20 tomorrow...I know that ball bearing turbos usually require a restrictor in the oil feed...my question is since the the stock turbo on the rb20/25 is ball bearing anyway...will i still need an oil feed restrictor?

I'm using a braided line that came with the turbo and I'm unsure of what the internal diameter of that line should be...would the standard holes in the banjo bolts be enough to restrict the oil flow for the new turbo?

Cheers...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/158764-another-oil-feedrestrictor-question/
Share on other sites

Quick question for the more technically inclined:

I'm putting a HKS2535 onto my rb20 tomorrow...I know that ball bearing turbos usually require a restrictor in the oil feed...my question is since the the stock turbo on the rb20/25 is ball bearing anyway...will i still need an oil feed restrictor?

I'm using a braided line that came with the turbo and I'm unsure of what the internal diameter of that line should be...would the standard holes in the banjo bolts be enough to restrict the oil flow for the new turbo?

Cheers...

The oil flow restrictor is in the inlet fitting in the turbo core.

Supply pipework size is irrelevant, ie; the restrictor is smaller than the smallest pipework you could buy.

:O Cheers :woot:

The oil flow restrictor is in the inlet fitting in the turbo core.

Supply pipework size is irrelevant, ie; the restrictor is smaller than the smallest pipework you could buy.

:( Cheers :)

SK is this the same for the garrett GT series turbochargers? I assume so. ALso in regards to the inlet line, I was thinking it ocould be a good idea to make it curl like the factory does IIRC, or would that restrict the flow of the oil and starve the turbo then? (I think Nismoid did this on his RB25)

cheers

-Jez

SK is this the same for the garrett GT series turbochargers? I assume so. ALso in regards to the inlet line, I was thinking it ocould be a good idea to make it curl like the factory does IIRC, or would that restrict the flow of the oil and starve the turbo then? (I think Nismoid did this on his RB25)

cheers

-Jez

The oil is under pressure, you can't restrict the flow pigtailing it. You can only stop/restrict the flow if you kink it. If you use braided line there is no need to pigtail it, the pigtail is only there to allow some flexibility [given that it is a hard pipe ie steel and inflexible] for vibration between the block and the turbo. A braided line is already flexible so caters for this.

I would avoid having the hose to short - a tight fit, but I would also avoid having the hose too long, allowing it to flop around and wear on other parts. I would think that if it was around 50mm longer than a straight line fit it would be ideal.

Excuse my dumbness, WTF is -3 hose? And it still doesnt answer my question, does the garrett have a restrictre built in? :P

3mm ID

If its a late model [modern] unit ball bearing then yes it should

GCG supplied me with a restrictor that pushed into my -4 line where it screws into the block.

but the hole in it was only about 1mm.

i would check with them if i was you. tell them the no. on your turbo and they will tell you if you need one or not.

the restrictor looks similar to a head oil feed restrictor.

to me 3mm sounds like you dont have a retrictor at all.

But its supposed to be in the turbo? Not the block?

Does this mean you can't see it? I've got my GT3076 in my hand and the only restriction I see is the 3mm hole/seat that the banjo bolt tightens into/onto. I don't see any other smaller hole.

The bolt shown above would not work, the brass insert would be sitting on the seat, not ver it.

Not sure how applicable it is to the RB's.

GCG appear to believe it is?

GCG supplied me with a restrictor that pushed into my -4 line where it screws into the block.

but the hole in it was only about 1mm.

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...r/faqs.html#t16

Ball-bearing turbochargers can benefit from the addition of an oil restrictor, as most engines deliver more pressure than a ball bearing turbo requires. The benefit is seen in improved boost response due to less windage of oil in the bearing. In addition, lower oil flow further reduces the risk of oil leakage compared to journal-bearing turbochargers. Oil pressure entering a ball-bearing turbocharger needs to be between 40 psi and 45 psi at the maximum engine operating speed. For many common passenger vehicle engines, this generally translates into a restrictor with a minimum of 0.040" diameter orifice upstream of the oil inlet on the turbocharger center section. Again, it is imperative that the restrictor be sized according to the oil pressure characteristics of the engine to which the turbo is attached. Always verify that the appropriate oil pressure is reaching the turbo.

The use of an oil restrictor can (but not always) help ensure that you have the proper oil flow/pressure entering the turbocharger, as well as extract the maximum performance.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Does anyone sell a pipe that's made to go from the Greddy FMIC kit for ECR33 (RB25DET) to the Greddy intake manifold? 
    • Not that I know from experience, but in theory you'd want your gate spring to be as close to target pressure as possible, so you'd go with the higher gate spring?
    • Before I commit to it as I already have the wastegate off the car, would you change it to the 9psi spring instead of the 12, or whack it back on now and try your suggestion?   Edit: Actually I might just swap the spring and see what the logs say after another few pulls, as we know it's still spiking without the Mac valve in the picture so I need more data without the Mac valve trying to combat the issue.
    • Sounds good Hmm suppose the main thing is, how much do you care about this car? The filler doesn't make for a very good water barrier lol. If there was a tiny little bit of rust forming now, that in 3 to 5 years time becomes obvious under the paint (starts to bubble up), would it bother you? 
    • I already have the ability to datalog the voltage... what I can't do is correlate it to what the gauge is showing when I'm looking at the data at a later date. Or something like this. Except getting the oil to 125C+ involves me going 200+kmh at the track so you can imagine this is a little tricky unless I do something like note what the voltage is when I am at the top of 5th gear so I have a point to reference on. Drove car today. O2 still reading richer because hopefully not a leak instead of massive restriction I've introduced. Car really doesn't sound like a LS. It's quite strange. Pulled a bit of fuel out up top. This does potentially explain why my spark plugs looked like the car was running pretty over-rich. If I was tuning it to a ~12.7 which in reality was far richer than that in the past. It will be handy to have the dyno WB to compare my WB to to compare notes that's for sure. At this point I'm happy to just sit in the passenger seat and tune the thing given I've got about 7 million hours on the platform lol.
×
×
  • Create New...