Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

Was just wondering which would you think is faster? Let me firstly put this in context - it's 400 metres down a straight line - quater mile...

Two Skyline with exactly the same mods, same car etc line up for a sprint down the track... would an AUTO or a MANUAL win?

This is what I have heard... MANUAL'S down the stretch would win... but AUTO'S launch better and the hold boost better ... is this correct?

I actually own an AUTO - I chose this as a preference.... I used to drive a manual twin turbo ZX300 ... but wanted the cruisieness of an auto for long trips and also I like how the AUTO'S hold boost and spool up the turbo quicker... any thoughts?

Regards,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/159409-manual-vs-automatic-turbo-skylines/
Share on other sites

if u only care about 1/4 mile, auto is the way to go. Once u start pushing into low 13's high 12's, manual becomes a big disadvantage

Yeah, I must agree.... down a straight line...Auto's shift perfectly.... so your answer is spot on.... :)

Guys ive driven both completely stock

the auto is much slower

especially off initial take-off

its probably about 1 second slower 0-100

(per my mechanic)

and unless you got a transbrake and a big stally

and a beefed up box

and you run sub tens

manual is alot quicker down the quarter

  • 2 weeks later...
Guys ive driven both completely stock

the auto is much slower

especially off initial take-off

its probably about 1 second slower 0-100

(per my mechanic)

and unless you got a transbrake and a big stally

and a beefed up box

and you run sub tens

manual is alot quicker down the quarter

however....

to run a 10 or low 11 second pass you will need above 300 kws at the wheels

for a manual this will include some moster clutch that grips like a muther and will be very hard to launch a rear wheel drive without bogging down, or smoking the rears.

on my wifes car i went the auto road because its very easy for my wife to drive to target or coles in

yet i can get in in it and do a low 11. Manuals with big clutches are a pig if its your family or daily driver.

im running the full built race trans from MV Automatics with all new internals bigger bands etc 3000 rpm high stall,

stage 2 shift kit with a large trans cooler and its a pleasure to drive.

I own a r32 gts t auto, recently iv been test driving allot of manuals gts t's because i want to buy one and i must say iv been dissapointed. The wifes auto feels much quicker than any r32 manual iv driven so far..Maybe all the ones iv driven have been scewed tho..

When we gtech'd it and some of our mates cars it ran a 14.78.(on the gtech) cant remember the exact mph but i think it was 95..if you stall them up with decent rubber they go really hard i rekn. Without stallining it up its slow. Witha auto its not hard to get consistant good times. With manual theres allot of variables.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
    • You can set hard reserves on your battery system, and it can't be discharged past that.  
    • That sounds like an excellent idea. But total self-sufficiency means exactly that. You have no-one else to blame when your system faults out and you have no power for a week or two while it gets fixed. You'd have to go the whole hog and get a diesel genny and all the switchover gear, to get you through such times. And, despite the fact that over 20 years, my system has been pretty reliable**, I have seen so many inverter explosions (or less dramatic deaths), panel and roof JB fires, and so on, over that time, to know that the stuff is the same as any other bulk Chinese manufactured stuff. The failure rate is well above zero - both on the equipment and on behalf of the meth addled installation labour force. And then..... warranty and means of redress against the supplier you bought the gear from. Best I can tell is that only a handful of solar companies are still around within 5 years of starting their advertising pitch. They disappear and phoenix like crazy. So, as per 1st paragraph, I suspect the only way to is go balls deep and spend maybe 2-3 times as much as you might think, so that you have every base covered. Plus, know and understand your gear intimately, so you can diagnose problems, sort them out yourself, etc, etc. Plus, probably have to consider upgrading various parts as the years pass, to maintain compatibility with newer stuff, performance and reliability, etc, etc. Whereas, remaining attached to the grid has an ongoing cost that keeps going up even if you use bugger all power from it. But it does provide the fallback in case of the worst case with your own gear. You either pay up front or as you go, I suspect.
    • Add more solar panels to the array. Call the electricity company and tell them you're moving out... Live off grid electric wise
    • Hi Jasmine. How's the war going?
×
×
  • Create New...