Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

tuner rekons to make a maximum of220-230 rwk i need to raise boost to at least 15-16 psi on a the hiflowed slide turbo but is it safe at that boost level with stock internals? here are my mods incase no one knows

-hiflow slide turbo

-pod

-pfc

-fmic

-3 in turbo back exhaust

- ebc

-555 cc injectors (in the way)

-tomei fuel pump in tank ( on the way)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/159453-is-15psi-too-much-on-r33-gtst/
Share on other sites

So basically if it took 10 psi to make 200rwk stock turbo and 10psi on a gt30r made for arguments sake 230rwkw. The eninge is under more load with the gt30r?

AM i correct saying psi is not a direct relation of stresses on teh motor.

More correctly put it would be that there are other stresses, RPM being the most dangerous.

:P cheers :O

provideing you can control the thing from pinging have done a few 25s but timeing isues always pop up but you should be ok with these mods you have .

Not so much of a problem these days with high octane fuel and ethanol eg; Shell V Power Racing 100 ron with 5% ethanol.

:P cheers :O

im fairly sure slide turbos are rated to 19psi safely... as far as what the stock internals will take.... i read that anything less than 270-280 rwkw is fine on stock internals.. so in answer, you should be able to easily run 18 psi quite safely.... with supporting mods you should be able to hit 250...

p.s. u will definately need that fuel pump and the bigger injectors to start getting much past 220-230... once you get those put in, go and get it retuned @ 18 PSI (or 20 if your prepared to accept the risks).

also remember that just because 9/10 people can run 18 or 20 psi every day with no probs, im sure there are stories of people running 16 psi on a highflow / bigger turbo that had their stock internals give up... its the risk u take i guess.

I run a Garrett GT3037 56t, .63 rear.

This thing pumps out some serious power, but is also a tiny bit laggy stopping the motor coping a hard hit everytime the power comes on.

I also cheat.........Water methanol Injection..

That cools the combustion temperatures by heaps, and prevents a lot of detonation. At one stage I did a few runs at 24psi and it just kept on pulling. Absolutely no detonation, and the AFR's were spot on.

Edited by The Mafia
im fairly sure slide turbos are rated to 19psi safely... as far as what the stock internals will take.... i read that anything less than 270-280 rwkw is fine on stock internals.. so in answer, you should be able to easily run 18 psi quite safely.... with supporting mods you should be able to hit 250...

unless we can see the compressor flow maps for it saying its safe for xyz psi means nothing

its just the turbine speed that is driven by the manifold pressure. the more pressure the later the wastegate is opened, which means faster compressor speed. it doesnt mean its flowing more useful air, just means there is more pressure.

well my tuner told me to run 16 psi so if he blows my car up he's payin for it lolz

you can run whatever boost you want as long as the tune is spot on...

should tune it on 16psi and run like 15 or 14 to be safe if your paranoid...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...