Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone, I just finished fitting the GT2860-5's to my R32 gtr and must say they've made a huge difference, the car feels more responsive and comes on boost earlier too. On full throttle it's fine but on really light acceleration and at cruise I now get bad waste gate flutter and surging. I never had this problem with the original turbo's and haven't changed anything other than the turbo's and a bit of metal off the exhaust manifolds.

Any ideas?? Help please!!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/160901-gt2860r-5s-surging-flutter/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

how much boost are you running? maybe you might need an aftermarket BOV.

Around 1bar I think (factory gauge). But I don't think it's got anything to do with the BOV's, It's barely seeing any boost at all at very light throttle.

I think his actually trying to describe the compressor surge problem.

I had this really bad on my GTR when I first bought it. with the original 2530's fitted it would "chuff" when cruising or light throttle up hill etc.

I bumped the base timing up by 2 degress and it fixed the problem.

it's compressor surge and the shuffling comes from the return pressure wave. after market BOV's being more heavily sprung will make it worse.

changes to tuning and/or cam gear positions should get rid of it.

edit/correction: it is not the BOV opening and closing, it is the flow of air back thru the AFM/airbox as incorrectly posted.

Edited by wolverine
Ok, I'll start with the basics i.e tune and see how it goes. I went through all the other threads on this topic and everyone is seems quick to point the finger at the BOV's.

its not the BOV's...to prove a point disconnect the vaccum line to them and block it so you don't have a manifold leak, then go for a light throttle drive up a long hill....i bet it still happens. Its the compressed air from the larger turbo's surging back out the intake through the AFM's.

You would not be on the throttle hard enough to generate boost, so the BOV would not even operate.

Ash ive had 2530's chuff so bad the car was almost undrivable....quick tune at Croydon's...magic...all gone!

Stock GTR BOV's are very good ive even seen them on hard tuned Supra's

Alright, well they are a fair bit bigger than the standards so I'm not ruling compressor surge out yet. I'll crimp the vacuum lines to the BOV's rendering them inactive tomoz and see what happens. But I don't understand how different turbo's is going to throw the BOV's out of wack??

Yer I've heard the standard BOV's are really good and I seriously doubt that they are the cause. But I shall test them and the plumbing for them anyway just so we know for sure. First i'll bump the timing up a tad as you suggested and see what happens. I've still only got a mines modified ecu at this stage so tuning is limited, wolf 3d coming soon. Thanks for the advice everyone, I'll let you know what I find.

i have been told this with my setup that the turbo was producing too much air forcing air through to my afm. causing more fuel and hesitation.

Apperantly only way to fix it (from what i have been told) is if ya get a computer that has an inbuilt map sensor, or move the afm to another location before the TPS.

Bit of farkin around but if thats what has to be done, then thats it.

Im upgrading turbo anyway so i'll deal with it when time comes.

Edited by bazr33

Yer that's why I'm going for the wolf 3d v5, do away with the afm's all together, bit more expensive but I think the plug n play is the way to go. But for now, unless a simple tweak of the CAS will fix it, it looks like I might just have to deal with it. Oh well, I was looking for another reason to spend more money on her!!

Well today I blocked off the BOV vacuum lines - made no difference what so ever - still very bad WASTEGATE flutter and surging goin on under there - rules out the BOV's once and for all (and it upset the idle). Advanced the CAS - made no difference either. It seems to occur right on the transition from vacuum to boost, near impossible to drive slow.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...