Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Grey enough to get a roadworthy and a defect. It definately does not give the all clear for any intercooler set-up as long as you don't have a pod. I think their use of 'pod' was misplaced and should have been 'Open element'.

It says no pods on carburetted vehicles....You'll find an RB20/25 is EFI....

Dry element pod type air cleaners are

permitted on EFI vehicles.

Intercoolers that are larger than standard or

have a different mounting location or are

added where none were originally fitted, are

permitted only if no other changes to the

intake system have been made. In other

words, you may have a pod filter or

modified/added intercooler, but not both.

Where does that not give the all clear for an intercooler?

Grey enough to get a roadworthy and a defect. It definately does not give the all clear for any intercooler set-up as long as you don't have a pod. I think their use of 'pod' was misplaced and should have been 'Open element'.

So getting back to your points... none of which were in your quoting of the rules

So, can you link/quote where it says all of the stuff you claimed to be illegal?

Dont trust burwood, thats where I got my car registered. Some old fat bloke was giving me a hard time, as my RWC cert had stock rims written and I had 17's on. He said the tyre brand didnt match the RWC ~_~..Also had to remove the GT wing brackets off the bootlid. A person would have to roll over the whole car to touch the brackets, and im sure there is already enough damage caused....

Although this wouldnt have been a problem if we all just upgraded our smics, like i did XD~

Sat back and watched this thread for farrr too long.

anDru, I have a Topstage CF airbox, and alas, I got defected about a month ago, because i still had 2 intake modifications.

I'm telling you it will NOT pass, unless you get a dodgy RWC, and a VicRoads member of staff that won't inspect the car... Good luck! Imagine if they do inspect the car AND see the pod? The person who issued the RWC could loose their license.

Just do it properly. That is all everyone is trying to say. Simple.

I'm telling you it will NOT pass, unless you get a dodgy RWC, and a VicRoads member of staff that won't inspect the car... Good luck! Imagine if they do inspect the car AND see the pod? The person who issued the RWC could loose their license.

that dosnt make sense, so u box it up yet his still able to see the pod?, obviously thats just the most stupid box ive head, reason why im getting a box(and a million others) is so that u cant see the pod.

i would like to see your setup because if its still being defected its being done wrong, i have a bunch of mates who have boxed theirs up and never EVER been defected.

just incase you missed all that nismoid i shall also send you a "larger" version.

It does make sense.

There is a POD underneath the box... i mean, you might aswell stick a "captain obvious" stick on the airbox.

Dont bother arguing the point, its still illegal, you can still be pinned for it, so its not wrong at all.

Whats wrong is your inability to accept the fact that your as wrong as it comes

ahhahahah okai nismoid, you got a point i shuodnt bother arguing anymore, because i have a box and its LEGAL. dont care wat you gotta say cuz thats all that counts....its LEGAL. and anyone who wants a cheap and effective way of clearing a defect + a few lil kws, will do the same.

so i guess that pretty much ends it, oh and just to let you know nismoid, uve been spamming this thread since day one because you have not answered the one main question in this thred, which was who make air boxes.

have a good nite everyone, and say hi if u see me on the road give us a honk cuz its legal biatch lol

Edited by anDru
ahhahahah okai nismoid, you got a point i shuodnt bother arguing anymore, because i have a box and its LEGAL. dont care wat you gotta say cuz thats all that counts....its LEGAL. and anyone who wants a cheap and effective way of clearing a defect + a few lil kws, will do the same.

so i guess that pretty much ends it, oh and just to let you know nismoid, uve been spamming this thread since day one because you have not answered the one main question in this thred, which was who make air boxes.

have a good nite everyone, and say hi if u see me on the road give us a honk cuz its legal biatch lol

you're not so smart are you mate

that dosnt make sense, so u box it up yet his still able to see the pod?, obviously thats just the most stupid box ive head, reason why im getting a box(and a million others) is so that u cant see the pod.

i would like to see your setup because if its still being defected its being done wrong, i have a bunch of mates who have boxed theirs up and never EVER been defected.

only a moron such as yourself would believe that there is a standard airbox and panel filter under that heatshield...

ahhahahah okai nismoid, you got a point i shuodnt bother arguing anymore, because i have a box and its LEGAL. dont care wat you gotta say cuz thats all that counts....its LEGAL. and anyone who wants a cheap and effective way of clearing a defect + a few lil kws, will do the same.

It is illegal. You are a moron.

These are the facts, and they are undisputed.

The law clearly states that you can only have ONE intake modification.

This CF air box is a modification, and you already have a FMIC. That is TWO intake modifications you have.

How is that legal? If it's not standard, then it's a modification.

However, if what you're arguing is that you won't get caught, well that's a different story. It still doesn't make it legal because you hid it, no matter how you spin it. The law is clear on this and if you get a smart cop pull you over, then you're back to square one. Just make it legal from the start for what the effort's worth, it could save you time/money in the future.

Sherwin from Chasers Motoworks makes pretty good perspex airboxes, not so sure about carbon firbe.

He's made some pretty crazy ones for r33's and evo's. Give them a buzz and see if they can help your case.

www.chasers.com.au

good luck

that dosnt make sense, so u box it up yet his still able to see the pod?, obviously thats just the most stupid box ive head, reason why im getting a box(and a million others) is so that u cant see the pod.

i would like to see your setup because if its still being defected its being done wrong, i have a bunch of mates who have boxed theirs up and never EVER been defected.

just incase you missed all that nismoid i shall also send you a "larger" version.

Mine is slightly different, as I don't have an Air Flow Meter to join it up to, but otherwise it's pretty much the same. Just in case you don't understand, I'm running a MAP sensor instead of the AFM :kiss: . There obviously is a point to it, to keep the warm engine bay air away from the pod filter. If you want to see my setup, mine is the engine bay pic in dezz's F1 photo thread, like the second pic down.

And the fact I got defected, is because it is my 2nd intake modification. Simple. Unless you leave the standard airbox, then you will get done everytime. (Give or take on the cop).

So just pass it with a standard airbox, and get a CF airbox afterwards for a bit of eye candy. It seriously ISN'T that hard. Or is it?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...