Jump to content
SAU Community

Are you interested in a custom modified PFC to suit your RB20 and RB25?  

336 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Ah I read that last night. Must have been half asleep.

I think the easiest way for the GTS-T is to bridge to two - cause that's how the Standard R33 Powerfc is naturally anyway. I tested mine at idle, and it was running 14.2 volts to a good ground (most likely 13.8 at its own ground)

So if we bridge the two outputs, then its does exactly what the normal FC does, and simply runs the pump flat out all day every day.

I think they do this with the GTR to prevent the pump being as loud as f**k all the time, especially when at idle.

It's a shame we can't run the lower voltage at idle for quietness, as I don't want anyones mum complaining when I have the car running and her in the back seat. (car running for the aircon)

Bridging them won't hurt anything, as they are simply 12volt outputs.

Ie: They output the same voltage. All they do is activate 2 different relays.

The first relay or output activates a circuit that delivers the pump 11 volts.

The second relay or output activates a circuit that delivers the pump 13 volts.

Since the R33 GTS-T doesn't have these two "circuts" in the boot like the GTR it wouldn't matter. It would see the combined voltage of the two outputs triggers, and simply turn the fuel pump on, and leave it on.

Because The First output turns off, and then the second one on after it, since they are bridged the relay in the boot only sees a constant "stay on" signal.

I'm sure Cubes would agree with all of this.

Where is he lol

Also, if you were REALLY worried and didn't believe me - attach a diode to each of the outputs on the ECU and THEN bridge them after the diodes.

Then the volts can't go back into the FC (even though they won't aas the FC with have Diodes and relays inside anyway to prevent this, and for normal operation)

When I mean the volts can't go back into the powerfc, I mean if one output shuts down, and the other powers up, then if bridged it can't go from one active output into a non active output. They are outputs anyway

- There will be a relay operating inside, and if the relay is off, then the volts can't go anywhere :P

Hnmmmmmm Cubes must have my mum out on a date or something.

Ah I read that last night. Must have been half asleep.

I think the easiest way for the GTS-T is to bridge to two - cause that's how the Standard R33 Powerfc is naturally anyway. I tested mine at idle, and it was running 14.2 volts to a good ground (most likely 13.8 at its own ground)

So if we bridge the two outputs, then its does exactly what the normal FC does, and simply runs the pump flat out all day every day.

I think they do this with the GTR to prevent the pump being as loud as f**k all the time, especially when at idle.

It's a shame we can't run the lower voltage at idle for quietness, as I don't want anyones mum complaining when I have the car running and her in the back seat. (car running for the aircon)

Bridging them won't hurt anything, as they are simply 12volt outputs.

Ie: They output the same voltage. All they do is activate 2 different relays.

The first relay or output activates a circuit that delivers the pump 11 volts.

The second relay or output activates a circuit that delivers the pump 13 volts.

Since the R33 GTS-T doesn't have these two "circuts" in the boot like the GTR it wouldn't matter. It would see the combined voltage of the two outputs triggers, and simply turn the fuel pump on, and leave it on.

Because The First output turns off, and then the second one on after it, since they are bridged the relay in the boot only sees a constant "stay on" signal.

I'm sure Cubes would agree with all of this.

Where is he lol

Also, if you were REALLY worried and didn't believe me - attach a diode to each of the outputs on the ECU and THEN bridge them after the diodes.

Then the volts can't go back into the FC (even though they won't aas the FC with have Diodes and relays inside anyway to prevent this, and for normal operation)

When I mean the volts can't go back into the powerfc, I mean if one output shuts down, and the other powers up, then if bridged it can't go from one active output into a non active output. They are outputs anyway

- There will be a relay operating inside, and if the relay is off, then the volts can't go anywhere :/

Hnmmmmmm Cubes must have my mum out on a date or something.

lol they are my emails to paul this morning

Hey Nick, hows the car running?

are you able to get good economy out of it?

Hmmm not at the moment having a bit to much fun driving it, but saying that only bout a 50km diff with all the mods.

PM use your number an next time im going to my beachouse ill give u a buzz, well catch up

just letting everyone know that I was successful in getting my GTR Powerfc to work in my RB25. I even gave it a bit of a tune. This means it will work 100% for the RB20.

Its up for sale too by the way so if you're interested, just let me know. Even if you want it just for a R32 \ R33 GTR.

I'll have my rb26 from nengun within a week or two. Its taken ~8weeks for delivery. :S

I'll be doing internal wiring mods so its a simple plug in.

I 'might' do a few for others that are in SA. Boostworkx have a datalogit that is required so tuning will be done there.

well, as I said up there - I have a perfectly good PowerFC to suit a R33\R32 GTR that I thought was a pro, and isn't.

Works perfectly, as I have been using it in my car and driving around with a light tune lol.

Its also configured to work also, and if you give me a heads up, I can load your data into it before I send it so that you can plug it in and drive to your tuner with it :thumbsup:

Just let me know everyone - I'll post a for sale thread at some stage.

Oh, and Its ready to go into an overnight bag, so you'd get it really fast :bunny:

might be interested joel, how much?

Let me get mine done first, order from nengun has taken 8 weeks so far. :thumbsup:

Fingers crossed I receive it next week.

Good thing with it being the 26fc is we can utilize your rb26 inlet air temp sensor.

well, the Powerfc and hand controller cost me $1100, and the loom $50

so $1150 plus post and its all yours \ anybody's :D I just want to get my money back.

but just remember, you need a tuner with a Datalogit or they won't be able to do it! I just spoke to cubes and I won't be able to do it from here unless I have a RB20. (I have a RB25)

If you have a RB25, thats another story. Mine *should* work and start - but I still recommend having someone with a datalogit near.

Its running my car right now though, and I will be driving to work with it tomorrow lol.

Edited by The Mafia

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSP male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSP reducing bush?
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
×
×
  • Create New...