Jump to content
SAU Community

Are you interested in a custom modified PFC to suit your RB20 and RB25?  

336 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

No more f**king around with Airflow curves, and Maf settings, as MAP sensors are universal on all cars as they only read pressure, regardless of pipe size, etc.

Any one have a djetro base map I can check out via the datalogit?

The afm pfc averages the two afm values and then derives the load value via a 32k constant. The single afm pfc's simply use a single afm value to derive load via a 16k constant.

I assume the djetro rb26 pfc runs to map sensors due to the rb26's individual throttle body's for each port. On the rb25 no doubt a single map bridged would do the trick. But why bother.. Just buy the kit. :happy:

Mafia.. Very keen to see the rb20 and rb30 back to back. The hks3037ProS would = poo on the rb20 unless you run the .6 scroll. :(

I have the full RB26 DJETRO manual at home. I can scan it for you paul.

basically the map sensor nipples are inserted into cylinders 3 and 4 of the throttle bridge for the 26. then their loom runs to the side port on the PFC, and also splices into the ecu harness (I assume into the two AFM signal wires).

I don't know how much better or worse PFC DJETRO is than the LJETRO. like paul said once you are at target boost the maps output just hold a flat line even though the acutal volume of air going in will increase. so I guess more reliance is placed on RPM axis and maybe TPS etc.

hey if you can scan that manual that would be great. ive seen where it taps into the boost control port, i suspect this is for power source for the map sensors.

so the map sensor connect to the AFM inputs on the loom, that makes sense. ive had a look and even discussion on the datalogit forums its still a 2d map so its purely load and rpm so TPS is used to move the load axis around.

Don't forget the inlet air temp sensors Mafia.. A critical part of a MAP based ECU if you want it to run half decently.

Im still under the impression load is derived purely from air temp and values received from the map sensors.

TPS.. I can't see it being useful for determining load especially on a forced induction motor.

I know somone has propably said this somwher along the line, but there is a new PFC for R33 due out for release late december early to mid feb 2008.

My source, a good mate in Japan who works in the industry.

Apparantly all the models using the old NEC chip have been changed to use a new LG manufactured chip.

Any one have a djetro base map I can check out via the datalogit?

The afm pfc averages the two afm values and then derives the load value via a 32k constant. The single afm pfc's simply use a single afm value to derive load via a 16k constant.

I assume the djetro rb26 pfc runs to map sensors due to the rb26's individual throttle body's for each port. On the rb25 no doubt a single map bridged would do the trick. But why bother.. Just buy the kit. :P

Mafia.. Very keen to see the rb20 and rb30 back to back. The hks3037ProS would = poo on the rb20 unless you run the .6 scroll. :)

Yeah, you're right, they need two map sensors to average between the inlet runners. I forgot they'd need to put them there because of the multi throttle body design.

Surely I can just plumb both map sensors into the RB25 intake plenum and have no problems?

Regarding the HKs 30307 - His has the 0.63 HKS rear on it, and its clearly smaller than my rear. Not sure why, but interesting. Laggy as dog shit in the RB20 though, especially with the RB20 stock ECU untuned..

Don't forget the inlet air temp sensors Mafia.. A critical part of a MAP based ECU if you want it to run half decently.

Im still under the impression load is derived purely from air temp and values received from the map sensors.

TPS.. I can't see it being useful for determining load especially on a forced induction motor.

Also, I hadn't forgot about the temp sensor, as map sensors require this data heavily. Weird how the powerfc uses this data though? As they are just sending a signal into the AFM wires.? Might have to investigate this a little more. Still curious to know why it also needs to be hooked up to the Cylinder 3 and 4 wires. Sounds like a ghetto way of using map sensors.

the datalogit guys disected the load axis calc and it just uses map sensor pimv instead of the afm volt and the same style CONST number calc

Can you speak engrish?

I know somone has propably said this somwher along the line, but there is a new PFC for R33 due out for release late december early to mid feb 2008.

My source, a good mate in Japan who works in the industry.

Apparantly all the models using the old NEC chip have been changed to use a new LG manufactured chip.

Will they have a few extra features like Ignition cut and Launch control?

That would be great :rofl::):P

Also, I hadn't forgot about the temp sensor, as map sensors require this data heavily. Weird how the powerfc uses this data though? As they are just sending a signal into the AFM wires.? Might have to investigate this a little more. Still curious to know why it also needs to be hooked up to the Cylinder 3 and 4 wires.

they don't tap into the cylinder 3 and 4 wires. I don't know where you are getting that from. there is no such thing as cylinder 3 and 4 AFM wires. there are only two AFMS in a stock GTR. AFM1 and AFM2. the Map sensors are spliced into AFM1 and AFM2 ecu inputs.

and yes you should be fine to place the sensors elsewhere in your GTST but I'm sure there will need to be a little thought about where is the best placement in order to get a good result.

other than that it should be fine.

Hay my egrish wrocks. LOL.

Sorry i am a terrible speller, person thing.

LOL

Not sure about additional features, but i know that the other boards are looking at an upgrade to the new chips as well, but i can do a little more digging through my friend for you.

they don't tap into the cylinder 3 and 4 wires. I don't know where you are getting that from. there is no such thing as cylinder 3 and 4 AFM wires. there are only two AFMS in a stock GTR. AFM1 and AFM2. the Map sensors are spliced into AFM1 and AFM2 ecu inputs.

ahh pual said something a few posts back, but I see what you mean now. Maybe I misread?

Ok, one more question - Does the Cefiro have a different wiring loom than the RB20? Or is it exactly the same, and our new wiring scheme will work? Doing one for a mate.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep that is correct. It allows you to adjust the short throw range from what I can tell
    • Car has been running great, I've put about 300km's of break in time on it. First thing that stands out with properly sealing rings is no more noticeable crankcase smell coming out of my catch can. This may seem insignificant, but the constant smell while driving around was infuriating. It's also nice to see my oil level remain stable. Two new issues have developed that I only noticed this weekend though. There's a very noticeable driveline vibration past 100kmh. I only noticed it now as I've been babying it under 100kmh in the backroads. This comes as no surprise as I'm running a one-piece shaft, and I paid zero attention to my driveshaft angle when I put everything back in. I also have a fair bit of voltage drop on hot starts. The starter audibly is forcing. No issues on cold start though. I must not have removed all the paint under my main block ground during assembly. I'll try and take care of both those issues this week once the kids are asleep.  I also received all the parts I was missing for my direct port setup. I will hopefully have pictures of that up soon. I'm hoping to get back on the dyno the week of June 30th as I'll be on vacation. I'm confident I should be able to make north of 500rwkw on pump gas and WMI. I'll go back again later this summer with E98, but I want to confirm my ethanol content sensor is working properly first. I've never seen it read anything but 11%. This makes sense for our 10% ethanol content pump gas here, but I would expect the occasional movement between fill ups. 
    • 75% complete. Will now need to get a new axle with 5x114.3 hubs and then figure out how to customize some mudguards for it once the wheels are on.
    • Trailer prep is underway... Lined up the wheel to get a rough indication of how it would sit Then removed all the bits (as far as possible) and gave the frame a light sand and quick lick of paint   Then added some carpet
    • okay, so I figured this out, removed needles and reinstalled after swapping the gauge face on my triple gauge for my ER34, all work and look good. I tried to do the same for the main cluster, but the main cluster gauge faces are dished, the replacement gauge face are flat, so due to the dish in the org face ,mounting backing plate (clear) and depth of the needle, the flat gauge face will not work. I notice that R34 gtr gauges are flat, appears to be different clear backing plate that aren't dished. are these available, or what have others done to install flat gauge faces?
×
×
  • Create New...