Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by kabab

I object i say we use channel 32 :)

i could seatle for 34 :(

How we use Channel 33, and you can use Channel 32? :)

We'll see who has more people on which channel ;)

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Andrew. :shake:

Guest veesixtyfour

Hey Guys, I can get UNIDEN stuff through work UHF radios as well as scanners and stuff so if we are all interested...

I might start up a thread and put this stuff on offer.. im not very well known so i understand if u guys arent sure :(

but it will be a damn sight cheaper then from any company we do a "bulk buy from"

1 catch it has to be 1 order.. i can do a follow up order later down the track :) but an idea for numbers if ur interested in the uniden stuff :) and what u want would be good ;)

Hey guys.

Me and Jay got our Digitalk's on Thursday and we've been trying them out.

They're great. Range is good, sound is good, the VOX seems to work well too.

So far, they're even good on battery life (we're using 650mA NiMH AAA's bought from Jaycar).

We're looking at doing a few mods too.

Maybe fitting a socket in place of the standard antenna, so we can use a better after market one, and possibly a 5-10 Watt booster amp :D

Originally posted by JiMb0

Cool, I must have one, I'm addicted to listening now ..... even if I have to shell ™ out the $1600 they're sposed to cost :eek:

Just as well you put the TM in there, Jim....unauthorised use of my name is $100 fine ok :uh-huh: :lol:

Well then it looks like a group buy is not needed. It was just an idea, and i didn't think we'd save that much anyway. If the Digitalk ones are any good quality/range/etc wise then i guess it'd be an idea for us to get them whilst they're cheap!

As for the channels.. Use 34, cause we all know they're the best!

Originally posted by veesixtyfour

Hey Guys, I can get UNIDEN stuff through work it will be a damn sight cheaper then from any company we do a "bulk buy from"

If you can get me them for under $70 each then I'll take 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...