Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 132
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

forum geeks??

me??

hahaha

Sorry mate, but I have under 200rwkw and I'll run rings around you! :happy: (Andru)

Seriously though man, ok, to hit over 260?

a GT3540

and a Z32 AFM or the nissan V8 AFM?

But still, Id be looking at internals to keep that engine alive for longer period of time.

And even then, you can still make 280 plus rwkw

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162228-300rwkw/page/2/#findComment-3016816
Share on other sites

forum geeks??

me??

hahaha

Sorry mate, but I have under 200rwkw and I'll run rings around you! :happy: (Andru)

Seriously though man, ok, to hit over 260?

a GT3540

and a Z32 AFM or the nissan V8 AFM?

But still, Id be looking at internals to keep that engine alive for longer period of time.

And even then, you can still make 280 plus rwkw

3540 is way to big for the rb25 to make 300rwkw

hell my HKS 3040 is a tad too big for what i get and be nice and streetable.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162228-300rwkw/page/2/#findComment-3016828
Share on other sites

oops

my mistake

so what would you say to use then?

(ECR033 - Brendan makes around 280 rwkw on this combination and ran a high 11)

What if you decided to use the RB30 bottom head? Obviously thats out of the question here but "theoretically" (sp?)

I think "MILF" the VL turbo has that combination and makes similar power

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162228-300rwkw/page/2/#findComment-3016840
Share on other sites

GT35/40 FTW.. you'll make well over 300rwkw with reasonable boost, that answers the "what's needed" question. But as everyone has stated, don't bother chasing that power and beyond unless you're willing to spend $$$$ to build the engine with forged internals + all the supporting fuel, cooling, breathing mods.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162228-300rwkw/page/2/#findComment-3016849
Share on other sites

oops

my mistake

so what would you say to use then?

(ECR033 - Brendan makes around 280 rwkw on this combination and ran a high 11)

What if you decided to use the RB30 bottom head? Obviously thats out of the question here but "theoretically" (sp?)

I think "MILF" the VL turbo has that combination and makes similar power

Hey Chris,

Small correction mate - I'm using a GT3040R at the moment :happy:

To keep the car streetable, I personally wouldn't go for anything larger than a GT30 series on a std rb25.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162228-300rwkw/page/2/#findComment-3016898
Share on other sites

im not to fused bout turbo size i know what im after, its just all the screwing around for everything to keep up with the turbo. its a hard job but im gonna give it a go.

how long will the car last with stock internals with 300rwkw. if possible id rather slap the turbo on now with the fuel pump and injectors, and when i get enough money put in the pistons, rods, ect

will it do alot of dmg or anything if im running 300kws with stock internals

Edited by anDru
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162228-300rwkw/page/2/#findComment-3017027
Share on other sites

i always thouught of maybe buying a whole new engine and doing a engine swap, makes sense and might actually be cheaper, but like i said, i hate that whole engine surgery crap

Edited by anDru
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162228-300rwkw/page/2/#findComment-3017043
Share on other sites

lol mate my car atm is 220rwkws......i know all u forum geeks think im some noob but take it easi lol....

i dont even think highflowing my turbo would even get anymore then 260rwkws, any suggestions on at least hitting 280? without all that engine sugeryy

lets see, if your aim is around 280rwkw then GT3040 with cams would do the trick. anything bigger will be laggy. and obviously other auxiliary components such as afm, fmic & etc will be needed.

as for injectors, 600cc would be sufficient for what you want to achieve.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162228-300rwkw/page/2/#findComment-3017047
Share on other sites

lets see, if your aim is around 280rwkw then GT3040 with cams would do the trick. anything bigger will be laggy. and obviously other auxiliary components such as afm, fmic & etc will be needed.

as for injectors, 600cc would be sufficient for what you want to achieve.

really? thats not a bad option then, i just hope wat u say is true, i think i would defiently need pistons though :happy:

Edited by anDru
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162228-300rwkw/page/2/#findComment-3017104
Share on other sites

really? thats not a bad option then, i just hope wat u say is true, i think i would defiently need pistons though :happy:

A mate has an r33 with this setup (r34 would get similar result) almost 290rwkw if i remember correctly. Cams are the important factor here much better mid range power, more driveable.

Regarding longevity, if you track the car with 280rwkw the stock engine will let go sooner than later, if you mainly using it on the street then it should be fine as long as you treat it with care.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162228-300rwkw/page/2/#findComment-3017151
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...