Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

bugger that for a joke. Good that it works but how did you go about pressure testing the system?

Not too bad if you do the job for your own vehicle but it sucks now because I've had three people ask me to change their valve springs and seals over without removing the head. What's your email so I can send 'em your way lol.

was that pressure testing or pressurising?

i didnt know you had to pressure test anything.

if you're serious my email is in my profile.

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

was that pressure testing or pressurising?

i didnt know you had to pressure test anything.

Just a pressure test through the port to ensure the stem seals are actually sealing.

Like I said, though...ok if you are doing it to your own car but not really the proper way or a good way to do it.

It's like changing camshafts over without removing the timing belt....sure it can be done but not a good way to do it.

i pulled out an extremely ugly one today. it looked pretty worn out from the inside, and was a complete prick to get off.

heres a pic, its not that clear, my phone cam couldnt focus on it that well:

post-13452-1175834417.jpg post-13452-1175834407.jpg

all done.

it wasnt a hard job. just make sure none of the hoses come loose on your compressor as it will cause you some huge dramas. if you dont have your piston at tdc and the compressor fails or a hose comes loose then you'll drop the valve in there.

also, the motor turns when you put the pressure on so just be careful of that, try keep the motor from turning somehow (maybe a breaker bar and 27mm socket). i didnt do this because im a bit of an impatient idiot (and it takes patience) but i went out and bought some oil cooler hose (capable of holding 120psi+) and some new heavy duty clamps for the compressor fittings and let the pressure run while pulling on it, it all checked out so i tightened it a little more then started working.

Question: If a piston is a TDC and you loose pressure, would the valves fall out, or only down? that is, is the situation recoverable with needle pliers, bent bit of wire and/or a magnet to get the valve back up. I would have thought that at TDC the valve would rest on the piston and still be 'recoverable', but it'd be nice to know.

To stop the motor turning, in gear and handbrake on???? Or is there too much movement in the drive train?

Otherwise good thing, all those workshops out there will just have to pick their act up now!!

all done.

it wasnt a hard job. just make sure none of the hoses come loose on your compressor as it will cause you some huge dramas. if you dont have your piston at tdc and the compressor fails or a hose comes loose then you'll drop the valve in there.

also, the motor turns when you put the pressure on so just be careful of that, try keep the motor from turning somehow (maybe a breaker bar and 27mm socket). i didnt do this because im a bit of an impatient idiot (and it takes patience) but i went out and bought some oil cooler hose (capable of holding 120psi+) and some new heavy duty clamps for the compressor fittings and let the pressure run while pulling on it, it all checked out so i tightened it a little more then started working.

Yeah, i realise that you need to keep the valve in the fully closed position to do the work, but I was thinking along the lines of what if your compressor stopped, or the hose/fitting blew. Is the situation recoverable, and if the valve only drops a few mm then the answer is yes, it is recoverable, you won't loose a valve in the combustion chamber. Hell with only 6-7mm you won't even loose one inside the guide - unless you aren't at TDC for that cylinder, then your in the poo.

yeah but thats 6 or 7mm more you have to compress the spring. and still need more to clear the collets.
nice work joe. i was abit worried for you. but thaey look f**ked. all coked up and everything.

lol geting those collets back in is a fine art that you have to re-learn everytime you do it lol. there a kunt

yeah! the first few were a pain in the ass. but once you work out a system they all go in pretty easily. it took me around an hr to do the first 4 (i was pretty much teaching myself how to do them). then it took me around 1.5hrs to do the other 20 once i got my technique down.

you'll probably lose around 15-20mm of the valve if it drops in (dont forget the haad is domed and so are the pistons) but you've got around 20-30mm of the valve to play with if its fallen in.

Otherwise good thing, all those workshops out there will just have to puck their act up now!!

Puck their act up? Surely you'd want them to do the job properly and thoroughly.

For the cost of a head gasket and inlet/exhaust gaskets, I would prefer to do the job properly. Plus the fact that removing the head actually takes the same time as doing it the other way and you can regrind the valve seats while you're there.

You won't get a decent workshop to change valve stem seals like that. Too much can go wrong and you can't test it afterwards so really it's a half arsed way to go about it.

I don't mean any disrespect to SECUR1TY by saying the above as I'm not directing it towards him. It is actually refreshing to see more people who'll get out there and try new things. Just making a point that when people ask me, or any respectable mechanic, to change stem seals like this...the answer will always be no.

so my results were a complete fluke?

i had very little background on how to do this, yet i did it without any problems at all. im not a qualified mechanic, im just a dude with a skyline that only needed new valve stem seals. my head gasket is 2000km old.

just because you dont do the job this way doesnt mean that no workshop does, i spoke to a few mechanics who didnt see any problem in doing it this way except for finding the right tool. then i got referred to a reputable workshop by an sau member to borrow their tool but ended up making my own.

it is a extremely cheaper way to do it. i paid $80 for a set of ACL valve stem seals, and $25 to make the tool. turn around time was alot quicker than getting a workshop to remove the head, buy a vrs kit and labour, and that would've cost around $800 easily. (vrs kit which includes valve stem seals costs around $250 trade price, and to do a head gasket ONLY costs around $600 to get done at a workshop).

the aim of this thread isnt to judge which way is better (although i still dont see any positives to wasting a perfectly good head gasket), but to tell and show other members its possible and doesnt need to cost shit loads to do.

Puck their act up?

Sorry, fat fingers, I meant pick, pick their act up.............and no I don't think its a substitute for a head rebuild. This is not going to help stuffed valves, guides or head gaskets. But it could be used as SECUR1TY has to change seals in a freshly built top end, or to change valve springs, cups or collets etc.

Anyway if you want to lap the valves back in, you use a couple of teaspoons of ajax in the combustion chamber like everyone else does.......................lol :laughing-smiley-014:

so my results were a complete fluke?

i had very little background on how to do this, yet i did it without any problems at all. im not a qualified mechanic, im just a dude with a skyline that only needed new valve stem seals. my head gasket is 2000km old.

just because you dont do the job this way doesnt mean that no workshop does, i spoke to a few mechanics who didnt see any problem in doing it this way except for finding the right tool. then i got referred to a reputable workshop by an sau member to borrow their tool but ended up making my own.

it is a extremely cheaper way to do it. i paid $80 for a set of ACL valve stem seals, and $25 to make the tool. turn around time was alot quicker than getting a workshop to remove the head, buy a vrs kit and labour, and that would've cost around $800 easily. (vrs kit which includes valve stem seals costs around $250 trade price, and to do a head gasket ONLY costs around $600 to get done at a workshop).

the aim of this thread isnt to judge which way is better (although i still dont see any positives to wasting a perfectly good head gasket), but to tell and show other members its possible and doesnt need to cost shit loads to do.

No I didn't say your results were a fluke and wasn't implying that you had done the wrong thing. I was commending you on a job well done and saying that it is good to see people actually having a go at doing stuff themselves. What I was disagreeing with was that some people are saying that workshops now have to pick up their act and do it this way to remain cost effective. The proper way is not always the cheapest.

As for the head gasket only having 2000ks on it....why were the stem seals not done then?

So just to re-cap so there is no confusion:

You did a great job and good work on reporting it all.

I CAN see why you did it that way afterwards but not sure why it wouldn't just get done with a head gasket to be thorough

I still stand by the fact that NO DECENT mechanic would do it that way to a customers car for the reason that it is only doing most of the job and not all.

well i did an engine rebuild and pretty much left the head untouched except for a shave. i got the vrs kit for $150 without the stem seals so i left them out.

the only problem i had with what you said was that it was half arsed. im sure that if there was a professional tool out there (and there is but not readily available in this country, which can be found HERE) you wouldnt think it was so dodgy.

as you seem like a decent mechanic i can understand that you are reluctant to try something like this. but its automotive innovation at its finest, i think :)

well i did an engine rebuild and pretty much left the head untouched except for a shave. i got the vrs kit for $150 without the stem seals so i left them out.

the only problem i had with what you said was that it was half arsed. im sure that if there was a professional tool out there (and there is but not readily available in this country, which can be found HERE) you wouldnt think it was so dodgy.

as you seem like a decent mechanic i can understand that you are reluctant to try something like this. but its automotive innovation at its finest, i think :)

So that tool can pressure test the head to make sure the stem seals are sealing correctly? Just so you can determine whether it actually is a seal that is the problem and not a cracked guide.

I know what you're saying and can appreciate what you have done....it's not a new thing, and those tools have been around for some time (decades). In fact I use them to install valve springs (after running in a cam, then changing over to double springs). Things like that are ok but you have to consider it from a workshops point of view and that a warranty has to be given to some extent. Also it is dodgy to only do 90% of the job by not testing it to ensure there will be no other problems. Also it will save you time by not having to do it again if it does turn out to be a cracked guide.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...