Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well this is the last part on my list before I send my engine away to get rebuild.....I am looking for a place to get a custom tunned lengthen manifold......Has to be mild steel or steam pipe and none of that crappy stainless that cracks....And this is the smoking gun.....Has to take the standard turbo position as I have a HKS GT2835 Pro S kit! 6boost is a place Ive tried but they werent much help in the way of getting one made up to fit my turbo.....So what workshops or people do u guys recommened???

cheers

Stainless isnt crappy, and stainless does not crack.

If the manifold is correctly made using good grade stainless, it will last.

Being the one from my car has been around for 20 years, never cracked :nyaanyaa:

Just thought i'd clarify that as you seem to have some bad info there.

Also to note that your going to be paying some serious $$$. Listing your location generally is a good idea dude.

Does the kit not include a manifold? Or is it meant to bolt upto the stock one?

hey mate if ur in sydney and want a steam pipe manifold made up pm me and ill give u a number of a guy that does them.... ur looking at about $900 for a custom one made out of steam pipe from this guy but hes good

my head is full of crap then...as i've been hearing stainless are crap...must be down to the grade of steel used i guess...does stainless retain the heat better then steam pipe? Im from perth unfortunately

Stainless isnt crappy, and stainless does not crack.

If the manifold is correctly made using good grade stainless, it will last.

Being the one from my car has been around for 20 years, never cracked :(

Just thought i'd clarify that as you seem to have some bad info there.

Also to note that your going to be paying some serious $$. Listing your location generally is a good idea dude.

Does the kit not include a manifold? Or is it meant to bolt upto the stock one?

stainless isnt crap. but it isnt as durable as steel. the factory gtsr manifold is awsome. but its a factory engineered item. not a copy of a copy lol.

the pipe doesnt crack its the welding wich givs way. if its not done corectly.

The welding on the GTS-R manifold is pretty average though

When we took mine off, you can tell its a factory style one as there is lots of areas you would tidy them up as lots of uneven work, not really matched that well to the ports etc.

Its just stuff you'd expect when paying $1500 for one that you dont see on a factory item even if 800 (plus spares) were only made

Just my 2c worth , if its a kit designed to fit the std exhaust manifold you could do worse than just run it that way and see what you think . I think you'll be pushing it uphill with the proverbial pointy stick trying to get an aftermarket manifold to do much better than the std one with the turbo in the standard position . HKS's bolt on kit assumes its going onto a std manifold and the plumbing is designed to work around std fittings . Once you go down the non std manifold road a lot of effort and money goes into making everything miss potentially red hot components .

Honestly if it were me I would leave the std manifold there , unless you planned to extrude hone it and fit the kit as intended .

Often cast manifolds particularly factory ones are quite durable and not as shoddy performance wise as many people think .

I'd imagine Cubes will step in soon and mention the sorts of power figures that these manifolds are good for and if its in step with the turbos potential there may be very little (if anything) lost over an expensive to buy/fit/plumb around tubular one .

2 cents spent , cheers Adrian .

i can make you a manifold that will exceed your expectations,but fitting it to the factory location is impossible.

if you must stay in the factory location,use the factory manifold and be happy. :P

my car is 100% street driven..thus i want max response and driveablity...My engine is fully rebuilt with forgies and can handle the power from any other bigger turbo...But I went with the gt2835 which i think is best suited to my application without sacrificing response/power and vice versa. Therefore I want to modify everything i can to max the turbo's potenial. These turbos tend to drop off boost higher in the rpm range even with the .87 a/r that i gave....A tunned length manifold may help

people on here have ran 1.4-1.5 bar....made 300-320rwkw.....grenpin and infected flow to name a few.....so no doubt they are still effective at this boost level.....just a matter of holding it there....possible restrictive air flow? inlet plenum and manifold wont help?

420ps - 414hp - 312kw before you even get to the rear end of the car.

Give a +/- 20rwkw for dyno differences and then 270-280 pops up easily enough.

Where are the dyno sheets you speak of? I cant find them anywhere to check out.

Id have to agree with R31 Nismoid here. I normally dont, so its obviously an exceptional circumstance :)

ovabooster,

you should really get your facts right. stainless steel while not being as ductile as plain carbon steel is not a 'crap' material for manifolds. in actual fact its better suited to the application primarily because of its corrosion inhibitors and some grades actually have higher strength at elevated temperatures.

R31 has already mentioned that most turbos have an operating range in terms of pressure ratio, which given some assumptions about inlet pressure similar in magnitude to atmospheric then you can estimate maximum manifold pressure.

The turbocharger your running can probably run the kind of pressure your after, however you will find that your intake temperatures become eccessive and that you will actually lose power because you will have to a run less fuel (less air density), run richer (contradictory to my last statement but think about it) to cool the charge, and more timing to reduce detonation.

Spend your money on the manifold how you like. Its not going on my car.

may i ask why you want a custom manifold for such a pissy turbo in the std position?

280-odd at the wheels is hardly pissy..... i would have picked a 3037s but the 2835 is no slouch on a 25 providing it is the 0.87 not the 0.68

my 180 made 260+ @ 1.2bar with the tight ass model (HKS 2835 56t with a 0.61)

Edited by URAS

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...