Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok so ill probably get the old 'search' bla bla. I want the specific input from people in South Australia.

First off - my stocker turbo is making a nice cat noise under boost, she still pulls hard, im thinking end shaft play, wheel hitting the housing..

After having a quick chat to Showza "read 4 door crazy slider" he seems to think rb25 turbo on my 93, gts-t will be better for the street than a vg30 turbo.

What are your thoughts and suggestions/theorys why i should get whichever turbo?

What needs to be done with both, oil/water lines etc?

Pretty much i can get a VG30 turbo for around the $400 mark, and likewise the RB25 turbozz.. haha

Im aiming for 200kw street driven.. but don't like the idea of lag.. (4000rpm boost kick in)

Cheers,

Cola

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/166593-r32-turbo-upgrade-rb25-or-vg30/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Just thinking of doing the same on my drift pig for a little extra oomph, cubes as well as the compressor wheel being bigger is the exhaust wheel bigger as well? id assume it is, and the housing looks to be bigger as well.....is an rb25 exhaust housing the same size as a vg?

*edit* Mr Infms, not sure if you'd quite break 200rwkw with an rb25/vg30 but be close......id say around 192-196rwkw.....If you want around 215 or more go a

HKS 25/30, minimal lag and a very responsive turbo, and can flow decent power.

Edited by evsr31

Forgot to mention, I've got 1bar (pretty much) by 3000rpm in 4th :P You wont get the VG30 turbo to do that.

RB25 rear housing is smaller than VG30, that's why VG30 isn't the best match for the RB20.

Doubt you'll make 200rwkw with the either turbo, but 180rwkw is plenty for the street. I can take you for a drive in my car if you want.

Cheers,

Showza

Edited by salad

Cheers for clearing that up, thought the rear housing was smaller making it more responsive.

Mates car is running a vg30 with more boost, exhaust, and no remap making 194rwkw on 1 bar, but thats a fair freak motor im thinking.

I'll def go 25 in the future, been in one with a 25 turbs and didnt feel too laggy at all.

As far as I know the oil feed / return and water feed / return line straight up? can anyone confirm this -_-

You ever thought about getting a turbo off of a neo RB25 motor?

I know Nightcrawler has just taken his off of his car and he might be able to sell you that as it is meant to make more power and spool quicker that the R33 turbo as it has a nylon rear wheel.

R34 turbo is essentially the R33 Series 2 turbo with the larger VG30 OP6 turbine housing.

It will be laggier..

The R33 S2 turbo is still the best bet closely followed by the S1 turbo.

I know of an rb20det that ran up on the boostworx dyno; rb25 turbo, good fmic, straight through 3" exhaust, ebc holding 14psi to redline & remapped ecu made 190rwkw.

I've attached his dyno sheet.

I hope he doesn't mind.. Shouldn't as he's posted it here before.

As you can see the std injectors are hitting 100% duty with close to 14:1 by peak power. :S

To hold a flat 12 on std rail pressure the std injectors hit 100% duty at around 180rwkw from what I've seen with mine and 2 others. All on the same dyno obviously... Different dyno's you may get either a higher or lower reading. But its all very close, generally only 5-10rwkw max providing its a DD dyno and run in the correct shoot out mode.

post-382-1177911702.jpg

You will need lines to suit, second hand around $1250.00 for a decent one.

And they are a t3 flange obviously.

*edit* sheez that leans out fair hard towards peak power.......injectors would be loving it.

That was with the remap I take it, without the remap they wouldnt be leaning out so hard?

Edited by evsr31

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 😢 
    • Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
×
×
  • Create New...