Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I just got the unifilter airbox!

got the pod and box as one

theres a group buy here also - check duncans sig.

As Ive said - Ive had highway patrol look at it and didnt care - he did say though

"Gee's, you are game having that there, wouldnt it catch on fire?"

me - "umm...its actually an airbox and made to resist heat"

him -"oh....right...umm...is that a factory blow off valve"

me - yes :)

and regards to sound and spool - mine with and without the box sounds the same!

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry .. Does steering include a aftermarket steering wheel? I.E no air bag?

if your car came with a airbag in the steering wheel as standard, then it is a defect to replace the steering wheel with an aftermarket one

PPL FFS! I freaking searched both sites alright. Reason I made this post is because I am paranoid about losing any points, I have 2 more months to go before I get all my points back so I dont want to risk it. Plz note, one of the guys I spoke to about this was telling me how he LOST his 3 points cos of the pod defect and now he only has 1 point left etc etc. So the first thing I did was search RTA and SAU was second. I dont give 2 toss about the fine as long as I dont lose any points.

Hey... I wasn't having a go at you! I understand where you are coming from! The search engine can be finnicky with what words you use! It was the way others replied to a post.

Anyways if you are after an airbox... check this out... I got one on my car and it is not difficult to modify if you have different intake pipe .. .. I just shaved mine out a little.. The only thing is its cut to suit the small charcoal canisters and not the large ones I have seen on some lines!

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi...p;rd=1&rd=1

ok. basicly anything that is not standard needs to be engineered from a legel standpoint.

and points for decects??? news to me. just like there is no points for driving an unregoed car. just a massive fine. for repeat ofences mayby???? but i t really depends on whos doing the busting. what if its not your car? fines yes, points i dought it. but will check

Offence Fine Points Double demerits? Law

DEFECT NOTICES/LABELS

Use vehicle in breach of major defect notice $308 3 RT (VR) Reg 1998

Cl 84(2)

DEFECT NOTICES/LABELS

Use vehicle in breach of minor defect notice $231 1 RT (VR) Reg 1998

Cl 84(2)

USE VEHICLE NOT COMPLY WITH STANDARD

Defective brakes $231 3 RT (VR) Reg 1998

Cl 57(1)(a)

USE VEHICLE NOT COMPLY WITH STANDARD

Defective seating $231 3 RT (VR) Reg 1998

Cl 57(1)(a)

USE VEHICLE NOT COMPLY WITH STANDARD

Defective steering $231 3 RT (VR) Reg 1998

Cl 57(1)(a)

USE VEHICLE NOT COMPLY WITH STANDARD

Seatbelt missing/defective $231 3 RT (VR) Reg 1998

Cl 57(1)(a)

well thats pretty gay. so they cancel your rego too like they used to?? bastards

Back to the issue at hand, definatley no points for a Pod Filter, it is only a defective equipment ticket for $77 and a Defect Notice (no fine involved with D.N.).

The main issue with a Pod filter is the emission (noise issue) that the filter creates through the system. ie; less restriction as you know on the engine usually transfers as more noise out the back. The best way to tackle the issue of a Pod filter if the person really wants one (as you know if they are in the engine bay with no shielding from the engine bay heat and no cold air ducting then you may aswell not have it under there. Box it up

hmm.. the fine for having a pod is $150.. well that was 2 years ago.. i don't think they'd have taken it down... these people only increase fines :thumbsup:

and brick - yuummm!!!!!!

Does sound weird but My best friend who works Highway Patrol in the Hunter valley just emailed me this information so for the fine to increase there must be add ons like in unsecured pod or too loud etc which I would believe that this would increase the fine.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...