Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey ... I am in the process of purchasing another FI car soon and thought i would throw this up!

its a toss up between a another GTR or one of these ford XR6t's.

i am interested mainly in development scope of both the RB26dett Vs the Barra i6t.

I am well aware of the ford barra i6t obvious on paper advantages of larger CC , its VCT and much later design but wondering if it Compares in scope (design ,efficiency, quality , longjebady, enhancements available to the RB26dett)

Anyone ever had the chance to own/use both under similar circumstances ie dyno runs with simular turbos on each engine etc and form any opinions?

:D

I have had

RB25

RB26

RB30

RB30 hybrid 26 head

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/170799-the-rb26dett-v-barra-i6t/
Share on other sites

interesting wiki has a bit of a comparision going on

Barra 270T

This is the most powerful I6 ever produced by Ford. Going by the officially stated specifications, it is possibly tied as the most powerful stock production I6 in the world (compared to the 360 HP M54 found in the 1400-unit limited production BMW E46 M3 CSL), since the Japanese high-power turbocharged I6's are by historical convention typically given artificially low specifications on paper (usually no more than 280hp). Going by empirically measured performance, the 4.0L 270T exceeds the ~320hp (239kW) output of most stock 2.6L RB26DETT and 3.0L 2JZ-GTE engines. It also has the highest torque of any Australian built engine. It is found in the BA and BF Falcon F6 Typhoon and Tornado and has been in production from 2004. The increase in power is from a Garrett GT3540 turbocharger.

Power is 270 kW / 362 HP @ 5250 rpm

Torque is 550 Nm @ 2000-4000 rpm

RB30/26 GTR with its high 4.11 gearing is a good match for response and acceleration up and rolling at any speed/any gear to the xr6t with a similiar peak power to weight ratio.

A near perfect package for a street gtr in my opinion is a single gt35r .82 (possibly .5 xr6t comp cover to pick up mid range) bolted on to the side of the rb30/26. Mild cams, good exh. manifold, and you can push close to 400rwkw.

They get off the line very quickly without bogging down + almost a little too much wheelspin with 4000-4500rpm on board. So no massive high rpm boy racer style launches required.

But saying that... You already own a few jap cars.. The XR6T cruiser mildly modified is good fun.

I often go for a bit of a cruise with a buddy who owns one thats making 270rwkw with only a tune and a bit of boost. Its a great package.

Gets up and goes hard without it sounding like one is 'hooning'.

He has owned it for a few years now racked up 80,000kms and has done in. 1 x turbo, 1 x gearbox and 1 x diff. :P

Typical aussy built car. My previous VS 5ltr 5speed went the same way after a few mods with the addition of cracking the rear irs subframe. lol

I can tell you they dont hold together long above 450rwkw no mater how builds them. You also find that their cam control from car to car is a little off due to the fact they press on the sensing teeth to the camshaft with no guid pin or keyway. Also power consistency from car to car once you turn them up is quite poor.

IMO Australian manufacturers can design cars they just cant mass produce cars when compared to japanese manufactuers.

By all accounts the engines do all right.

Shame about the 1800kg car that surrounds them, and the weak as piss drivelines behind them. Does anyone know of a modified turbo falcon that hasn't done a box or diff (or 3)?

later design but wondering if it Compares in scope (design ,efficiency, quality , longjebady, enhancements available to the RB26dett)

we have a few fleet XR6t's here (none stock :P ) and my next lease will probaly be for one but i would never say it is a later design..... the base design is older with vct tacked on... ever opened one up? if you do you will see just how basic and cheaply built they are.

but for the coin they are great bang for buck and when modded seriously stonk. The only let down is build quality and consistant niggling problems but hey it under lease... you dont pay anyway :P

Edited by URAS
I have heard of a few people going through those turbo's with increases in boost, thought this might have been another one...... obviously not.

WTF?? Dags/paint flakes from where???

Fixxxer?

Their turbo failures are caused by a couple of things..

The oil screen/filter blocks causing the turbo to starve.

The paint flakes and metal dags within the inlet pipe which is a well known problem.

Fords fix was to rip the pipe off and sand blast it. Thats what they did with my buddy's anyway. Just poor build quality.

I own a BF XR6 Turbo at the moment.

Maybe visit www.fordxr6turbo.com for a look at how the engine responds to light and heavy modification (depending on budget obviously), Im a member and there is tonnes of info on how the guys have their T's set up...

My T is moderately stock - and not an impressive handling car to say the least, you dont feel all the power because of the weight it holds - but iv heard an edit (custom tune) makes it a different beast all together...

Cheers.

the xr6t are a grossly undertuned engine from factory to keep them below the v8 power level. they are only running 6psi. with a flashtune, better exhaust and some more boost they become a rather impressive machine indeed. the big thing would be to get 1 from new, and baby it for the first few thousand k's. i think a lot of the problems that there are with the xr6ts is that people are getting them then thrashing them from day 1, and not letting the engine wear in. but then they are a 1700kg car. but if you want to carry friends, or tow, it is the one.

as far as the gtr goes, you have the problem of if something does break, it will probably cost a fair bit more to fix. my mate was quoted under $1000 for a new turbo from ford for his xr6t. but you do get the image that goes with it, and 4wd. but you also get the police attention too.

As has been said before.

An XR6T, whilst no GT-R, will give you bundles of turbo joy without you being hassled by the police.

The really important point is to get a GOOD tune. The Ford ECU is several orders of magnitude more complex & better than anything connected to an RB26. A bad tune will probably leave you with a rod through the side of the block from detonation. Or just less power as the ECU goes into a protection mode.

for the money on mods i don't think theres anything on the market that will compare with the power of XR6T.

I got one thats pushing 338rwkw, all it has is valve spring, injectors, flash tune, full exhaust........it does start to lose power after few runs...desperate for a cooler.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...