Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Had a good time watching all the cars ... was wondering what some peoples results were ... the best i can remember was most skylines getting 13's ... martin soarer doing low 13's ... an old school skyline doing 15's (about 45 times too i might add :P ) ... and excel in the low 13's ( i wonder whats under the bonnet??) ... that red rotary drag car doing a 9 something and made me deaf ... keirs 32gtr with a 10.42? also made me deaf ... lots of commies in the 13's 14's ... falcon with a 12.9?? oh yeah ... evos with low 13's and 180's in high 12's??

correct me if im wrong ..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/17154-drag-results/
Share on other sites

Very nice times there man! It certainly looked the goods.

The whole car was twisting and rocking at the 1st/2nd gearchanges - I was sure something was bound to snap with all that force/grunt! What mods do you have? Did you import the car yourself or is it local realease? (not sure if they sold them here or not).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/17154-drag-results/#findComment-355002
Share on other sites

my friend with me has an evo4 ... he didn't race it and it was parked outside with next to my car ... it used to be 224kw@all 4 ... that was with a hks turbo ... and motec computer tuned by rpm ... he never races his car though ... hes since taken out the big turbo and made everything stock agian ... lookin to sell this evo4

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/17154-drag-results/#findComment-355087
Share on other sites

Good to see everyone out and finally put some faces to names.

I did 13 passes and my clutch didn't even stink on the way home!! Even though the commentator (Andrew I think) thought I was trying to fry it, with so many runs in a row.

The track was bloody slippery at first but good to see some nice rubber laid down throughout the day. I finally broke into the 12.4's running 15PSI with a 12.421 at 110.26MPH (60' 1.835sec).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/17154-drag-results/#findComment-355619
Share on other sites

Great day, thanks Ivan & crew from RPM. First time I've ever done it and was good to drive home OK (apart from a now leaking exhaust manifold that I'm told is no big deal for a while!).

13.42 ET, 106.5mph, best 60' was 2.11s.

Main thing is that I beat grepin, Chris32 and Bugalugs :burnout: Dare I say quickest GTS-T on the day! Bugalugs' run were amazing though, 13.44 I think and 106.99mph!! And that's with a stock ECU...good stuff.

grepin, do you now surender? Do we declare WW1 has been won by Freebaggin .... or should we wait until after the climactic battle this Sat at Tilbrooks for the outcome of WW1?

Then WW2 starts soon after!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/17154-drag-results/#findComment-355737
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...