Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I wrote an email to somebody about but i cant remember who or what.

anyway moral to the story I went through my user profile to change my sig but stuff got 'lost' and messed it up. I don't know what I clicked through now it was a little while ago. Doesn't matter anyway my user can login but doesnt have permissions to post anything, topic reply etc cant view pics as has no permission. It is waiting for validation for something. specifies this next the the " My Controls" link in the "top bar". Was my fault for clicking through i went looking through a bunch of stuff an it asked me to login so I put in my details again etc and kept going so meh.

the idea was i updated the profle with some details :

:) <-- Dave

some help would be great cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/171638-some-help-with-my-login/
Share on other sites

I tryed to change it to my work addy, it never came, I checked. might still be on my ol addy which is like 2-3 years old from a job I worked as a techy for a year.

I grep'd for anything @s* an droped to a text file... believe me there was nothing there remotely like sau unless it would have came through another... it would be a piece of piss to run through the archives looking for something if you have the domain name the message would have been sent from. ^^ header details or something

either way I messed up... help the dreamer

if just role it back to prior I can login with my details to confirm or ask in pm any details an Ill confirm... whatever you need

Edited by scheris

im getting different errors on load now.

***********************

IPS Driver Error

There appears to be an error with the database.

You can try to refresh the page by clicking here

***********************

Cheers for the help btw mate !

only happens on the other login. the misses 1 is fine. aka same machine

Edited by scheris

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...