Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

they dont look like gtr pods.. got similar design.. but sticks out too much..

sorry adz dont like it at all..

just keep your car simple and neat :whistling:

Maybe try the abflug kit??

post-12579-1182128339_thumb.jpg

Edited by siddr20
R33 abflug kit :D

I must have some bad tastes :domokun:

nah i agre with you. some of the kits going around, good name brands. just look so fast and furious hotwheels style. im def a fan of simple is more and nothing too twisty and flashy.

I'm with you Jake: Standard R33 "M" body kit: But i would like to fit the 400R rear bar and D-wing (i have the D-wing, just need the 400R bar). Actually there is a rare front lip, that attaches to our front bars that i wouldn't mind getting as well. Similar to the S2 Nismo lip but for the S1 bar, i believe it was also a Nismo item.

nah trust me i like my simple kits as well..

if it was me, i would gtr pods, 400r skirts, gtr wing.. leave the s2 bar..

OR get a eastbeat front bar, series 3 lip, and carbon bonnet..

Trust me i like it simple as well..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...