Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey SAU peeps,

With my R33 getting it's 100k service - I changed the plugs myself to save some cash and learn something new.

BIG THANKS to members who posted tutorials for changing plugs - they were a great help.

Pulling the plugs out on the RB25DE they were some American brand... in a Jap car? (go figure...)

Anyway the plugs were in good condition - not covered in soot or oily. So the engine is running well.

After reading the forums I chose to install some NGK iridium’s (they were matched to the engine so no I didn’t stuff it up)

And after installing I found many problems with rough idle and acceleration - you could call it a gentle misfire or a "popping" sensation if you get my meaning.

On my mechanics advice I changed them to Nissan platinum’s and the misfire was almost gone - none under acceleration - just on idle - so infrequent that you almost cant notice it - but I am anal, so I did ;-) lol...

It turns out that one of the coil packs is on its way out - or beginning too. Replacements are coming soonest.

At the end of the day - using iridium plugs enhanced the problem of the coil packs. Using factory recommended platinum’s almost cured the problem.

So my experience is to stick with platinums.

Edited by negoshi8or
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/172717-iridium-vs-platinum-plugs/
Share on other sites

Hi..

That is odd!!!

I love my NGK Iridiums !!!!!...

But then again, I set them up properly...hehehe!

I will not be using anything else in future, especially those majorly over-priced Nissan Plat's. (they are good though!!)

Anyways, glad you're happy now...

Regards,

your problem isnt with the type of plug suited to the car, the problem is the gap they come with. larger gaps will cause a bit of a miss under load. smaller gaps wont.

if you know how to re-gap spark plugs i recommend gapping your iridiums to .8mm using a feeler gauge and trying them that way. if it still doesnt work then at least youve still got your platinums.

personally i have less problems with plain copper plugs shit load cheaper as well

Yeah cant go wrong $10 for a set of copper plugs.

your problem isnt with the type of plug suited to the car, the problem is the gap they come with. larger gaps will cause a bit of a miss under load. smaller gaps wont.

if you know how to re-gap spark plugs i recommend gapping your iridiums to .8mm using a feeler gauge and trying them that way. if it still doesnt work then at least youve still got your platinums.

As stated above it sounds more like that gap (which probably would of been 1.1) with your miss problems, get the feeler gauge out and re gap them and see what happens like Joe said you still have the other plugs if nothing changes :D

personally i have less problems with plain copper plugs shit load cheaper as well

I just don't understand this comment......or the others like it.

How could you have less problems using an inferior copper plug?

I understand the price point makes them attractive, but why would you want something that requires changing so often (or have them changed by an expensive mechanic!).

I think the cost thing is negated simply on that point.

Also, the wear and tear on removing covers, IC piping, leads, transformers etc could lead to an expensive job with constant removal and subsequent re-installation from using the shorter life copper plugs.....

...no, not for me....I'd rather be driving than servicing.

I also think that the majority of issues is to do with the 'purchaser' / 'installer' of spark plugs, they simply don't understand gap importance, go head on into a job without the research or they expect miracles from the plugs themselves, be it copper or plat/iridium...ie...noobs.

Anyways, just thought I'd throw that into this 3 ring circus ..... :laughing-smiley-014:

Kindest Regards,

Superspit.

copper is actually a better conductor than the iridium or platinum coated plugs. ontop of that they cost next to nothing compared to iridiums or platinums.

and not everybody pays a mechanic when getting something done. iridiums may be good for you, but the obvious choice for everyone in the know.

copper is actually a better conductor than the iridium or platinum coated plugs. ontop of that they cost next to nothing compared to iridiums or platinums.

and not everybody pays a mechanic when getting something done. iridiums may be good for you, but the obvious choice for everyone in the know.

Thankyou Security...but this looks to be unconvincing to me...sorry...did you really read my thread, which I thought was quite objective in parts?

could someone please tell me why I should go to coppers...or, could someone else give a reason why one should stay with the factory specified plugs.....ps.not interested in cost, I'm more interested in standard skyline performance. (ie.not racing).

I'm really looking for some fresh responses here, and think that many others may be interested in this age old topic.

Kindest Regards,

Superspit.

In a "performance" engine, the increased temperatures and pressures of the combustion chamber can break the fragile tip off the Iridium plugs.

Not only that, but Platinum is a catalyst for heat... which leads to pre-ignition...

Copper has proven itself time and time again.

Unless it's in an NA grocery getter, stay away from Platinum Plugs

Here's an excerpt from Sport Compact Car magazine

"Take an ultra-high output turbocharged engine for example. to operate safely at a high boost the engine requires colder plugs. these cold plugs don't reach sel-cleaning temeperature off-boost, however, so the plugs foul and the engine tends to run poorly whenever you aren't abusing it. the self-cleaning properties of the surface gap design should help preventmisfires under these conditions, correcting the engines masochistic split personality. at the other end of that engine's boost curve the surface gap design could again prove useful. as air pressure and fuel density increase in the plug gap, (both of which happen when you turn up the boost) the voltage required to initiate a spark increases, often to the point where even a strong ignition system can't consistently provide enough voltage. in this case the reduced voltage requirements of the surface gap could keep the engine running properly at high boost, making more power, and possibly allowing a higher boost limit.

of course all this is speculation. currently the coldest platinum +4 plugs have a 7 heat range, and no applications have been releasd for turbocharged vehicles. Trachte explains that applications were being released in stages. those for which there was little doubt that the plus would work, and where a minimum of testing would have to be done, have already been released. those applications where there was some possibility of a problem, such as turbocharged cars, are undergoing further testing and evaluation before the plugs are released. in teh case of turbos, trachte is concerned that the increased combustion temperature combined with the soark rcing across the surface of the insulator could overheat the insulator. this could make it more susceptible to pucnture failures when sparks try to jump through the insulator from the center electrode to the shell of the spark plug. remember though that he is looking for 100,000 mile reliability. nobody running the kind of boost that would require a colder plug or a stronger ignition system should haev any illusions about keeping their spark plugs nearly that long. overheating the insulator may not be a problem at all, but only further testing will tell.

one place the platinum +4 won't help is a rotary. while the multi electrode design is similar to many of the most effective rotary plugs, martin kasnowski, product manager for aftermarket parts, warned that their tests had shown a sttrange vibration peculiar to rotaries could occasionally cause the ground electrodes to break off. since demand for rotary plugs is low bosch didn't bother to solve the problem. with only that one caveat, though, the platinum +4 appears to be as close to a miracle cure-all spark plug that you're likely to find. ................"

your problem isnt with the type of plug suited to the car, the problem is the gap they come with. larger gaps will cause a bit of a miss under load. smaller gaps wont.

if you know how to re-gap spark plugs i recommend gapping your iridiums to .8mm using a feeler gauge and trying them that way. if it still doesnt work then at least youve still got your platinums.

You shouldn't re-gap iridium or platinum plugs yourself. They are actually iridium or platinum coated, not solid iridium or platinum.

If you re-gap these plugs you take off or chip some of the iridium or platinum coating thus reducing the life of the plug severely.

If you want a certain gap with these plugs they should be bought pre-gapped.

The reason you can re-gap copper plugs to your hearts content is because they're solid copper, no coatings.

Thankyou Security...but this looks to be unconvincing to me...sorry...did you really read my thread, which I thought was quite objective in parts?

could someone please tell me why I should go to coppers...or, could someone else give a reason why one should stay with the factory specified plugs.....ps.not interested in cost, I'm more interested in standard skyline performance. (ie.not racing).

I'm really looking for some fresh responses here, and think that many others may be interested in this age old topic.

Kindest Regards,

Superspit.

I'm going to go against the grain here and agree with superspit. I'd rather not be changing my plugs every 5000kms.

I've replaced my plugs with Iridiums and could not be happier.

I even used the factory specs for the plugs which is 1.1mm gap and heat range 5 (oh no! he used heat range 5 and a 1.1mm gap, that's a sin!).

I have all the stage 1 mods on my car, exhaust, 12psi, Pfc, fmic, blah, blah blah and I have not experienced the misfiring that everyone complains about. To add I also have a 93 R33 and still have the stock coilpacks. And yet you'd think I'd definitely have a problem because they're so old.

I hate it when someone says "you should always gap your plugs down to .8mm and use a colder plug" when its totally not necessary.

In my personal opinion, use the factory specs for your plugs. If you experience problems, then use plugs with a .8mm gap and colder heat range, and copper if you must.

But for those with regular track visits, I can understand using .8mm gaps colder heat range and copper. But if you don't visit the track, why should you? If you don't have problems with the factory spec plugs, why change it? (rhetorical question)

Cheers ;)

Edited by KeyMaker

The reason you can re-gap copper plugs to your hearts content is because they're solid copper, no coatings.

I going to go against the grain here and agree with superspit. I'd rather not be changing my plugs every 5000kms.

I've replaced my plugs with Iridiums and could not be happier.

I even used the factory specs for the plugs which is 1.1mm gap and heat range 5 (oh no! he used heat range 5 and a 1.1mm gap, that's a sin!).

sounds good Keymaker...I thankyou for that.

regards,

Superspit.

Edited by superspit
i replaced mine with iridum .8 . on recommendations by tuner i swapped to .8 coppers and found it actualy ran smoother, go figure

hi NSM...

maybe your other plugs weren't screwed in properly???

Seriously...all this talk on coppers has made me decide on something....

I have some time off very shortly, so I'm going to humour myself, go and spend 10 buck on some coppers, chuck'em in the line, push it real good, and see what happens.

I'll get back to you guys with a report of my own personal findings..

regards,

Spit.

Well heres my fat 2c

For your thread: Platinum or Iridium, I use Iridium, always have in my GTR and GTST. I find it really good and not had one issue with them. THERE IS MY ANSWER TO YOUR THREAD.

Now for some extra info. The GTR's came out of the factory with platinums. Now Nissan wouldnt make a car to detonate using platinum plugs, in fact they would tune it to provide maximum safety and maximum power... so this talk on pre-igniting fuel is some weird talk.

When I was experimenting with copper in my GTST, I found that it was great for 1000km after that, ran like a pig.

Also the less and less you change your plugs the less wear you are putting on your engine parts, as in on-off-on-off etc etc. More screwing around, you'll end up breaking something.

Gapping, buy the freaking right gapped plugs in the first place, and yes try a hotter heat range as in a 5 if your car is running crap.

My true answer to this is, buy the factory spec plug because its already been engineered for you. you should not have a problem using a recommended platinum/iridium plug, in fact why dont you email NGK to see what they list for your car.

b!tching closed.

Well heres my fat 2c

For your thread: Platinum or Iridium, I use Iridium, always have in my GTR and GTST. I find it really good and not had one issue with them. THERE IS MY ANSWER TO YOUR THREAD.

Now for some extra info. The GTR's came out of the factory with platinums. Now Nissan wouldnt make a car to detonate using platinum plugs, in fact they would tune it to provide maximum safety and maximum power... so this talk on pre-igniting fuel is some weird talk.

When I was experimenting with copper in my GTST, I found that it was great for 1000km after that, ran like a pig.

Also the less and less you change your plugs the less wear you are putting on your engine parts, as in on-off-on-off etc etc. More screwing around, you'll end up breaking something.

Gapping, buy the freaking right gapped plugs in the first place, and yes try a hotter heat range as in a 5 if your car is running crap.

My true answer to this is, buy the factory spec plug because its already been engineered for you. you should not have a problem using a recommended platinum/iridium plug, in fact why dont you email NGK to see what they list for your car.

b!tching closed.

well, ........I guess that's that!!

hehehehe...... :laughing-smiley-014:

To chuck a spanner in the works,

im looking at getting some Iridium IX shortly, hopefully they will have a smaller gapping to try. They state they use less voltage to create the spark, in which my understanding from physics year 12, will have less heat generated around the coil packs.

:(:worship:

Edited by arbess

Yea, Ive been using Iridiums and they are great. last for ages. no missing or anything, also noticed smoother idle, crisper power delivery and better fuel economey. runs like a dream all the time. sure they are more pricey but as they say "you get what you pay for".

ps. arbess id be interested to know how the new Iridium IX's go :worship:

so this talk on pre-igniting fuel is some weird talk.

This would be true if all the cars we're talking about were as Nissan released them from factory. Copper is probably the best thermal conductor you will find, and Iridium/Platinum plugs will tend to retain heat near the tip which could lead to pre-ignition under extreme conditions.

Just FYI, i run NGK BKR6E-11 copper plugs at 1.1mm gap (with Splitfire coils) at 0.85bar boost pressure in an RB25 and haven't had a hint of misfire in the few months it has been this way.

edit: Just to add to this, i'm not necessarily saying Iridium/Platinum plugs are bad. The advantage with these materials is in their relatively high strength, higher melting point etc, which means the tips can be made finer and you then don't need as much voltage to create spark, and also that they will erode more slowly, leading to the much longer service life. Technically you should be able to run a larger gap with Iridium plugs, and you'll see some OEMs recommend using larger gaps with these. If you look at NGK's racing spark plug catalogue, there's no copper plugs to be found anywhere. It's all about matching plug to application.

Edited by govich
Yea, Ive been using Iridiums and they are great. last for ages. no missing or anything, also noticed smoother idle, crisper power delivery and better fuel economey. runs like a dream all the time. sure they are more pricey but as they say "you get what you pay for".

ps. arbess id be interested to know how the new Iridium IX's go :blink:

hehe not a worry mate, will be looking at getting a set soon.

Like I've said in other threads, my 32 GTST came with Iridiums and the car missfired like a beeatch, I never checked the gap on the Iri's though, so it may have been 1.1mm. I might try them again some day if I can get them in 0.8mm.

On the copper side: I replaced the iridiums with coppers (0.8mm) and it ran great, which solved my problems, and made me :blink:

I also find that I can get at least 10000 out of the coppers before I wish to change them (I could probably go further but just for piece of mind I change them). So, every 2nd service I do the plugs.

On another note, I may go to Iridiums because soon the coppers will be just as expensive.... seems every time I go to autobarn they have jacked up the price again, last time they charged me $5 per plug.....

Fixxxer :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1680, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
    • hahah when youtube subscribers are faster than my updates here. Yes some vid from the day is up, here:  Note that as with all track day videos it is boring watching after the bloopers at the start.  The off was a genuine surprise to me, I've literally done a thousand laps around the place and I've never had instability there; basically it rolled into oversteer, slipped, gripped and spat me out. On the way off I mowed down one of the instructor's cones and it sat there all day looking at me with accusing cone eyes as I drove past. 1:13:20 was my fastest lap, and it was in the second session, 3rd lap.  It (or me!) got slower throughout the day as it got hotter.      
×
×
  • Create New...