Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey ppl

I need some advice on whats going on with my r33. Yesterday i took my car for a dyno now six months ago it ran 250 hp no worries and what was with a stock fuel pump and inject and coils and pod. Yesterday i took the car back because we put some more boost into the car and a 040 fuel pump took see what happen. Now about 2 weeks before it have a tune and it ran 234 at 10psi cause the fuel pump was not working properly. So yesterday it ran a 218hp with new fuel pump and 14psi boost. the air fuel ratio was fine it was bout 10 or 11. One problem we think it might be is that turbo has a big whistle before boost it doesnt sound healthy. So any ideas

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/173367-r2525det-power-problems/
Share on other sites

white smoke can be either turbo or just the regular smoke when hot air goes into cold, black smoke is the fuel, it may be running ricg.

what mods are u running in the way of a computer or safc or what?

if ur in melb take it to ray @ RE customs. he'll fix it. mine had a faulty crank angle sensor which reduced hp when we dynoed. easy fix.

but tel us the mods and we'll see if we can help ye out. btw get rid of the 040, they sh*t and get a tomei fuel pump. speak to r33god he can get em at a good price.

his mods are "possibly" highflowed turbo (i am going to take it off on the weekend and have a look), 040 pump which i put in on the weekend, new spark plugs, pod filter, fmic, turbosmart boost controller, turbo back exhaust and remapped ecu. i think that is all, dan will post up if i missed any.

i know it can't be the dyno reading out because a r33 with stock turbo, remapped ecu, full exhaust, cooler on 14psi made 271hp immediately before him, and a xr6t with flashtune and 12psi made 299.3hp dirrectly after him.

i was talking to the dyno operator and he said that it came up to around 100hp at about 80kmh nice and easilly and then just didn't really keep going from there.

a few problems we know of are: missing one of the nuts from where the turbo bolts to the manifold, has a loose bolt on the compressor housing (one of the ones that if you loosen you can spin the housing round).

we know it isn't a fuel issue as once it came on boost the afr's dropped from mid 12's down to low to mid 10's. the graph was a bit rough and when they put the graph from the run a few weeks back it was much, much smoother. my guess is that the turbo is just dead, which is why i want to pull it off this weekend. the whistle dan mentioned is also there on boost, he just can't hear it from inside the car.

Its a long shot...but could it be blow-by at higher revs being injested into the intake and causing detonation...thus causing the knock sensor to retard timing and hence less power? Also...afrs of around 10ish seems alittle rich to me...that would hold power back too...

Edited by limpus

yeah we realise that it is running on the rich side. i think that will be a big factor in the loss of close to 20hp. the afr's on the 230hp run were rather lean. we have a emange waiting to be tuned. we are just waiting for the new turbo to arrive, but dan wants to check that the bottom end is ok (compression test, etc). if it is dead of dying then i have a rb30 sitting in the shed at home that we will build up.

we got a new turbo coming so we are just going to scrap the turbo that's on it.

we have just put it down to the fact that the afrs are so rich compared to what they were last time. last time they were in the mid 12's to 13's, now they are low to mid 10's.

also found out that the skyline that went on before dan that mad 271hp had afr's of low 13's, so that explains the power it made.

but first we gotta replace the rack end and tie rod end cause the passenger side one keeps dropping out cause the thread is stuffed. luckilly it has dropped out while dan is driving on the highway. it has only dropped out while he is in town.

Yeah it luckky it didnt happen on they highway I would have become another "young silly drive doing highspeed" well that was the cops would have said. Aholes. I looking at bout 300 for a new rack fitted. As for the turbo once the new one gets here lets see what that does. the whistle is really startning to drive me nuts its gettn worst everyday but I love driving it too much to leave it at home.

Well Mark I am hoping like all hell the dam turbos here today I am get aliittle pissy with Autobarn

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...