Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

its not bracks fault that his son is stupid.....the kid should have been more aware as his father is premier of vic....but i cant see the kid getting the full force of the law....probably will get a friendly finger wave from the judge.....

No one's saying it's Bracks fault (well it is actually, it's Bracks Jnr. hehehe) we are just wrapped that his own laws will bite him now :(

true true...haha that kid is bracks jnr man...he looks just like his father ahhahahaha

btw...did everyone see the news? man that kid must have been going pretty fast if that saab (which is build like those old volvos - unbreakable) had that much damage :rant:

forsees future headlines...

"President of Australia Steve Bracks blames his sons homo errotic porno home movies with Rove McManus Jr on a spiked drink... it seems once again the phantom drink spiker strikes again. After a slue of incidents from the age of 18, Bracks Jr has been the victim of numerous unfortunate attacks from the Phantom Drink Spiker.

Blammed now for Bracks Jrs drunken rampage at schoolies in 2005, a torrent of drunken car accidents, a number of public nudity charges including running at the Queen of England yelling out "Get a load of these crown Jewels ya skank!" and now the number one reason behind his home movies where he embarks in a number of homo errotic encounters with other public figures sons."

he should get the following.

1 year losse of licence.

loss of car for 3 months.

and do defenceive driver trg.

man his dad would have known his son was driveing the saab but let it go couse he didn't know that it was turbo or that it had being put on the baned list

Yes I find it funny that when someone elses child has an accident and they harden the laws and blam the parents but when it is one of there own well things change they say it was a somone else who caused it and as a parent they did all they could to educate them to make ther own choices. WHAT THE F#C# ever

well well, had a read of the herald to day and saw that the saab was a 900I.

an illegal car for p-platers as it is a 2.2L turbo from memory. i have driven them and they are resnerbly quick.

so charges i see.

drink driveing

dangerous diveing

driveing under the influance

driveing a high powered vechile.

sentince

jail

yeah but its the premiers son we are talking about here.. if we did it, we will go to jail for life and then on death row.. but no its his son.. 1 year loss TOPS and a slap on the wrist... f**kEN cops!!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...