Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just posted a Vid (Spicers cup) Its Sportscar Steves just learning but winning Races already, V8 Supercars Run with him and he is beating them now.

He hit the wall in race 2 ,Will put that race up soon. We have 4 weeks to get it finished.

That's awesome!

Did you guys make that front end, or is it a off the shelf mould?

How far back has the engine been moved?

Toy: SR20 is best :down:

Ahhhh, a good old R20 vs RB20 discussion... I thought these were reserved for NS.com!

ah NS, so many amusing threads.

nothing against rb20's in general but i'm still stumped as to why people remove a perfectly good sr to chuck in an extra 100kgs over the nose with the same sort of power and all the cooling, installation and wiring issues that go with it....

go the RB20. it sounds like a sweet trumpeter under your bonnet. SR20 sounds like someone ripped an engine from the closest tractor. the sound alone is almost reason enough to love the RB20! having said that I wouldn't be chucking the SR20 out of my silvia in a hurry either. good power and torque, just sound like rubbish and they do like to break.

in fact, troy knows one day my track car will be an R32 GTST with 2.2L SR20. or maybe try a 2.4L RB20. but I reckon a nicely built 2.2 SR20 with a good sized turbo (around 3037) in a GTST would be a nice thing.

Driving each others cars back from PI it was sad to get back in my car. The SR20 is better on the street , no doubt! Bit when driven in anger at the track i would say the RB20 does just fine. Yes, you should buy that GTSt, the exchange rate is going your way

Both are good engines in their own right, and are pretty damn tough too (RB would pip the SR at this, but the SR is plenty tough in stock form IMO), I just wouldn't put that weight over the front of an S chassis. I was going to go RB26 for a while there, but decided against it for that reason. That RB25 180 above makes me think perhaps I should have! Though it looks to have the engine placed further back and lower which I'm sure has a lot to do with it.

I agree.... I personally wouldn't put an RB in an S chassis either. And I also think the SR is a great engine, i hear of all these stories of inherent weaknesses, but I'm yet to see it with my own eyes..... sure I believe it's possible in a super-highly tuned SR, but for most applications, they do just fine.

To my ears, an Rb20 is music, I can't get enough :)

Driving each others cars back from PI it was sad to get back in my car. The SR20 is better on the street , no doubt! Bit when driven in anger at the track i would say the RB20 does just fine. Yes, you should buy that GTSt, the exchange rate is going your way

well driving your car on the street you are right. in any kind of traffic or low speed limit zones you never really get a chance to get it right up onto boost with the gate open so you always feel like you're getting half screwed and let go every time you shift up at 4,500 or so. the only way around that is drive like a loon and revs the nuts off it in 1st and 2nd everywhere but that wont win you any friends. and it feels like it is breathless under about 4,500. but mate, once the road clears and the speed limit goes up you get it up in the fun zone and it's awesome. it's the perfect car to 'cruise' on the street. and then thrash it on the track. and even if it's not quick low down it sounds amazing. on the street a good sounding car is enough to keep me happy, cause a car with lots of torque just gets you in trouble as they are still quick at 'street rpm'.

the grass is always greener. i would trade you my silvia for your 32 any day, but with how serious your 32 is now that would just be an insult to you.... having said that put a TD06 on the silvia and a few other little bits and it would be a closer fight. :)

man I still want to buy that 32. every month or so I remind tets I want it, but he is still not selling. the owner practically never drives it anymore which is sad as it is apparently a very nicely sorted car. it's my dream package. prime garage built 2.2 SR20, from memory it was a 3037 or 2835 with external gate, all the other good gear engine wise, motec ECU, lots of good stuff. then we could really play :blink:

I agree.... I personally wouldn't put an RB in an S chassis either. And I also think the SR is a great engine, i hear of all these stories of inherent weaknesses, but I'm yet to see it with my own eyes..... sure I believe it's possible in a super-highly tuned SR, but for most applications, they do just fine.

To my ears, an Rb20 is music, I can't get enough :)

I think yours is a testament to the might of the RB20, 5 days of abuse, many a track day.. all on a stock wrecker motor...

and the noise? about 20+ vids on youtube attest to the the sweet XXX rated sound of a 20 on song!

I agree.... I personally wouldn't put an RB in an S chassis either. And I also think the SR is a great engine, i hear of all these stories of inherent weaknesses, but I'm yet to see it with my own eyes..... sure I believe it's possible in a super-highly tuned SR, but for most applications, they do just fine.

To my ears, an Rb20 is music, I can't get enough

Definitely, your car sounds very sweet!

My stock 1991 SR came out of my car having run 240rwkw's for 3 years, with 4 track days, and maybe 3 or 4 DECA days, as well as drifting etc and tested within 2psi across all cylinders and never broke anything :)

Richard: That 32 sounds a treat mate! I've always had a hankering for an SR powered 32 as well...

I really think engine longevity is more to do with the original condition when you start, combined with good tuning, good servicing, temperature management and a little bit of mechanical sympathy.

My stock bottom end rb25 copped a flogging, did about 10 track days and many skidpans with between 260 and 288rwkw, got revved to 7400 and rarely saw less than 1.3bar. As with phunky's sr it was compression tested before removal from the car and was within 3psi across all cylinders.

I plan on further testing my theory by sticking a 3071 on the side of a low km s15 sr20 and stuffing some boost into it with the intention of around 260-270rwkw. We'll see if the engine dies before the box breaks :)

There isnt enough to justify a build thread :thumbsup: Troy hits tyres at Sandown...two years later when i got sick of looking at dent car goes to panel beater. Car sits at panel beaters while i work OS :D Pretty sad really :)

So hopefully will be back in Aus in November at which time i hope to be able to put fuel in and go! But still std RB20 etc etc

a little pic of the silvia with it's new 3 point tomei brace. the dumb thing is I actually did have a strut brace. :D lol I forgot it was there. it was one that tucks up near the back of the engine, and it's actually a nice one. a mines alloy one of all things. it's pretty cool and weighs absolutely nothing and would have cost a pretty penny. so if anyone with an S13 needs a strut brace give me a yell!

s131h.jpg

and a pic of the silvia with my RX7. took this as a bit of a farewell pic as the RX7 is going to it's new home shortly. :D

it's funny. I've been driving the RX7 a lot lately and it feels very nimble and quite powerful...until I drove the silvia again. being a 88 model it's light as hell, (around 1200kg) and has 230rwkw and lots of suspension gear. next to the RX7 it feels like a V8 powered go-kart! when I got back in the RX7 afterwards it felt like a luxo barge. and that's saying something as it's actually a pretty raw car to drive.

s132.jpg

s133.jpg

s134.jpg

anyway the main news is the silvia is back baby! and I'm loving it. :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
×
×
  • Create New...