Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK every base has been covered with the car, no leaks in the piping, HKS actuator set at 15psi (and 11psi)

This is what I'm faced with (see below)....initial comments on my car was it's very quiet for a 3" turbo back system.

I'm convinced it's too much back-pressure slowing the turbine down and boost dropping off.

Comments please :thumbsup:

post-1182-1185141113_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/177679-confirm-my-exhaust-restriction/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Do you have an EBC? And what sort of exhaust do you have?

Have a look at the exhaust, do you have a hi-flow cat, mandrel bends, how many and what kind of mufflers (design and diameter). Dropping boost usually means a restriction somewhere, my exhaust is pretty loud but holds 12psi all the way to redline. My rotor has a fairly muffled 3" system with some crush bends, and it can't hold onto the boost to redline.

Fixxxer

Has a CES split dump, mandrel 3" the CAT should be a 3" highflow (installed by CES) doesn't have a hotdog it's a proper baffel toward the rear but the magnaflow twin tip is where I think I'm coming unstuck.

One run was done with EBC another with purely HKS actuator setting, also displayed the same behaviour with a turbotech bleedvalve, the stock actuator and trying an RB20 actuator.

I've got a nice free-flowing exhaust with cannon as a loaner to put on to confirm my suspicions.

seems awefully similar to mine

190rwkw 14psi dropping to 12psi

manifold was cracked and replaced, rear Fujitsubo was causing a restricition - added a highflow 3inch Kakimoto muffler and all is fine now. Just got to retune it, soon hopefully.

Hey Dan

One important thing that we need to know first. What turbo are you running?

I remember you telling me that its the slide highflow, but which one (rb25, rb25 oversize, vg, vg oversize).

Even the smallest one on 15 psi should make a fair amount more than that. On 15 psi, a car we did got around 225 rwkw (after tune).

Best way to find out, to just crack the catback off (including the cat) and see HOW restrictive it is

It's the VG30 oversize, it pretty much looks like as the engine is starting to get going then the exhaust is restricting like hell.

I'd be expecting over 200rwkw at 11psi

A mate is giving me his system to try on the car, should answer the question instantly.

Whoever has heard my car would agree it's spookily quiet for 3" system :cool:

Whoever has heard my car would agree it's spookily quiet for 3" system :cool:

so was mine.... centre to offset muffle, muffled big time. very quiet.

got a 2ndhand Kakimoto 3inch centre to centre straight thru muffler off a GTR. niiiiice. $65 delivered from WA.

welded it on, nice sound, restriction gone. set at 14psi but seen 15psi in a cold valley with foot down mashn the pedal.

stage1 slide rb25 highflow turbo

For what it's worth Dan, Me thinks it's not the exhaust...... With my stocka, and almost identical exhaust to yours I am getting 176rwkw.

OK every base has been covered with the car, no leaks in the piping, HKS actuator set at 15psi (and 11psi)

This is what I'm faced with (see below)....initial comments on my car was it's very quiet for a 3" turbo back system.

I'm convinced it's too much back-pressure slowing the turbine down and boost dropping off.

Comments please :cool:

post-1182-1185141113_thumb.jpg

Mine does this too

boosts to 12psi and tapers off to 9psi (got 195.5rwkws)

also a r34 gtt and also very quiet for a 3" turbo back exhaust

I thought maybe my cat had shit itself

im going to make a new cat section and try that out

For what it's worth Dan, Me thinks it's not the exhaust...... With my stocka, and almost identical exhaust to yours I am getting 176rwkw.

It's not identical Pete, we've got different mufflers...yours is bigger. You've always had a better flowing exhaust than my one. You'r boost went through the roof after installing it, my stock turbo never really budged.

This is 100% exhaust restriction, I just wanted a few others to confirm.

Nothing else on the car can account for what's happening.

I suspect that it is exhaust restriction, but I don't think anyone can really say for certain.

When you knock the exhaust off and swap it with your friends, make sure you do the cat too. Some 'high flow' cats are not really high flow at all.

Your car is quite a bit down on power in terms of what it 'should' be making. After swapping exhausts, if you feel a lot more power, and response, then that means it was the exhaust :cool:

umm .. not sure why nobody has commented on this before

why dont you just disconnect your Exhaust from where it bolts onto the dump from the turbo ?

its going to be loud as hell .. and *might* run a bit lean .. but if the restriction is as massive as your leading it on to be .. a quick run on the dyno should be able to confirm if its pumping out much more horsepower. Even the " seat of the pants " dyno will tell you pretty quickly.

just support the remaining portions of the exhaust if your going to road test it and be careful and you should be ok ..

Obviously doing this on the dyno where you can keep an eye on mixtures etc will be the better way of doing it .

I suspect that it is exhaust restriction, but I don't think anyone can really say for certain.

When you knock the exhaust off and swap it with your friends, make sure you do the cat too. Some 'high flow' cats are not really high flow at all.

Your car is quite a bit down on power in terms of what it 'should' be making. After swapping exhausts, if you feel a lot more power, and response, then that means it was the exhaust :)

x2 'hi flow' cat is too much of general term everyone seems to be classifying their cats as, when most probably flow a lot less in comparison with quality hi flow metal cats that cost $350+

umm .. not sure why nobody has commented on this before

why dont you just disconnect your Exhaust from where it bolts onto the dump from the turbo ?

its going to be loud as hell .. and *might* run a bit lean .. but if the restriction is as massive as your leading it on to be .. a quick run on the dyno should be able to confirm if its pumping out much more horsepower. Even the " seat of the pants " dyno will tell you pretty quickly.

just support the remaining portions of the exhaust if your going to road test it and be careful and you should be ok ..

Obviously doing this on the dyno where you can keep an eye on mixtures etc will be the better way of doing it .

I said that above in my first reply.

I always do that even if the power is where I expect it to be.

Every exhaust IS a restriction. What matters is whether it is a restriction at that power level. e.g. your quite 3" exhaust shoudl flow more than the standard exhaust. At standard pwoer levels, it is most likely that it won't pose much restriction at all. But then, at 200 rwkw, 250 rwkw, or 300 rwkw, the restriction will become evident

That's why I always take it off and do a back to back run just to see how much restriction there is.

ok. you need to unsrew your cat converter heat sensor and scre in a suitible fitting to mesure actual back pressure. also is it an apexi boost controler? cos they do that, it is electronic?

if its a bleed valve then thats normal. and all the vac lines to come from the inlet manifold or it will do that to.

ok.. try setting the boost controler to 4 pound higher. iff it still drops off the same amouint, then its the boost controler setting.

also adjust the gain to max, then adjust the boost setting. always the gain has to be max to stop the boost dropping off.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...