Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys i just recently got my fmic fitted, and it is kinda defeating the purpose, my intake pipe is straight above my fan and my pipe is getting quite warm, why have a fmic to cool the air, if it is just gonna heat up in the pipe again? is there any type of covering i can put in between my fan and piping to stop the heat transfering from the hot engine air??

or would it make any difference at all?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/178597-help-with-intercooler/
Share on other sites

its pretty dumb really, but all the piping kits route the cold pipe past the radiator.

the best way would be to customize your piping, so the hot pipe from the turbo runs past the radiator, an into the drivers side of the cooler.

then your cold pipe can run the standard route from passenger side into the plenum. its a shorter distance, and doesnt pass through any hot areas.

oh ideally yes that would be great, but i dont really have the cash to do that being custom and evrythin, my best bet would have been to go for the same side/ entry/exit cooler, but we live and learn, is this a common problem with us rb25 folk? what are u others doing to prevent heat transfer or are we just dealing with it?

its pretty dumb really, but all the piping kits route the cold pipe past the radiator.

the best way would be to customize your piping, so the hot pipe from the turbo runs past the radiator, an into the drivers side of the cooler.

then your cold pipe can run the standard route from passenger side into the plenum. its a shorter distance, and doesnt pass through any hot areas.

Is it just me or would that make the piping length massive? :yes: Still has to come across the block to go into the plenum as well...

But yeah even though the pipe gets warm the cooling effect you are getting very easily outweighs any problem with making the air a bit warmer around that pipe. To be honest I'd never really thought about that, but I wouldn't worry at all about it. When I first fitted my fmic it came across the same way, but now my piping is modified on the drivers side and doesnt go anywhere near there :blink:

yeh fair call, it just pisses me off to know all that effort to have no change! even though the piping gets hot, would the air inside be same tempreture?i might get a vented bonnet ???remove some of that hot air, i know for a fact the cooler is working becuase its cold before it enters the engine bay then warms up like FARK

yeh true, just want my car to be getting the best out of what mods i put in :yes: might try some heat shielding tape or something! is there a way to test intake tempretures? from intake piping?

You should have asked me about it yesterday :santa:

The heat transfer from pipe to air will be negligible as the air is moving pretty fast and compared to the volume of air passing through, there is very little contact area. As mentioned, you can wrap it. You can also space the bonnet up off the hinges if you're worried about under bonnet temps. As for intake temps, you'd need a thermocouple inserted just before the throttle body with a seperate gauge.

OIC.

so tis will affect all rb25s?

im driving a r34 gtt and i was planning to purchase a FMIC.

so should i just get the intercooler with out the kit and get some custom work done?

any ideas how much to get it done in Perth?

thanks for the info.

and one more thing does this affects the hks type S intercooler kit???

if it does ill just get the intercooler by itself and get some custom piping done.

Edited by lcy
You should have asked me about it yesterday :action-smiley-069:

The heat transfer from pipe to air will be negligible as the air is moving pretty fast and compared to the volume of air passing through, there is very little contact area. As mentioned, you can wrap it. You can also space the bonnet up off the hinges if you're worried about under bonnet temps. As for intake temps, you'd need a thermocouple inserted just before the throttle body with a seperate gauge.

hehe didnt cross my mind dude sorry :(, so u dont think the air in the pipe will heat up due to amount flowing through

Put it this way.... You will not notice any loss of power whilst driving, as bubba said the velocity of air over the pipe is too fast to transfer any significant amount of heat. You will probably get more radiant heat from the engine itself!

If you are really that concerned get some heat wrap.

Ash.

yeh ill see how the heat wrap goes, or get bonnet raised a little, i am planning on getting it repainted and realigned so might as well do it all at the same time :action-smiley-069: be very interesting to see how cold the air actually is though compared to piping temp

i do custom piping and agree that inlet and outlet on the same side of the cooler is soo much simpler and shorter and doesnt require messing with the battery or washer reservoir . only problem is that the front bar mounting point may need to be modified depending on the cooler .

kermit

i do custom piping and agree that inlet and outlet on the same side of the cooler is soo much simpler and shorter and doesnt require messing with the battery or washer reservoir . only problem is that the front bar mounting point may need to be modified depending on the cooler .

kermit

battery is in boot and washer bottle isnt affected

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...