Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeah thats what i thought, but i read a thread from the UK aswell as a HPI review and both said you couldnt run it if you have a PFC, which seemed a little weird to me aswell but i thought it wouldnt hurt to check before handing out my hard earned.

well some people in japan also told me they are not compatible. It's possible they are not. remember the Bee-R is basically an interceptor... so yes it does have to work along side the PFC.

only one way to find out though.... but it and tell us what happens.

to be honest they are a bit of a wank. they don't do much except cause some slow damage to your car and make you like like a bit of a tool. unless we are talking for a dedicated drag car, in which case go for it.

b man, the Bee*R rev limiter does not mean fuel cut as vehicle reached certain RPM

the rev limiter is a device used to cut sparks at pre-set condition, so you'll have fuel going through the exhaust valves and igniting in manifold, making flames shoot out of exhaust. there are two conditions that can be chosen, the rev and the launch I think.

yeah thats what i thought, but i read a thread from the UK aswell as a HPI review and both said you couldnt run it if you have a PFC, which seemed a little weird to me aswell but i thought it wouldnt hurt to check before handing out my hard earned.

That's BS, HPI installed a Bee*R rev limiter in their 4 door 32 with a PFC.

Works with my PFC too.

b man, the Bee*R rev limiter does not mean fuel cut as vehicle reached certain RPM

the rev limiter is a device used to cut sparks at pre-set condition, so you'll have fuel going through the exhaust valves and igniting in manifold, making flames shoot out of exhaust. there are two conditions that can be chosen, the rev and the launch I think.

You can also hook a micro switch up to the clutch pedal on the secondary limiter for a very primitive anti-lag set setup. Works though :thumbsup:

Still in two minds about getting one and installing it...

Purely to use at the 1/4

But smashing it off the limiter (BeeR limiter) and launching it wont make my gearbox happy i dont think.

Im not running a cat also but ive hear there will be jack sheit left in your muffler after using these too? (Sorry to hi-jack)

Using bee*r with a pfc allows you to see the fantastic knock numbers produced.

And it does cut fuel ASWELL as spark.

doupt it cuts fuel, otherwise there won't be flames shooting out at all...I don't get how you'll have high knocks as well? I think the Bee*R randomly cuts spark from one of the 6 cylinders? there's only 3 wires going out of the Bee*R unit if I remember correctly... without spark the fuel won't ignite at all, ignition by compresion alone requires extremely high comp ratio. so no combustion for particular cylinder,

knock is more of sporadic combustion, one main flame and smaller pockets of flame as pistons move up...

+ I dun think it has the function of antilag at launch, looks like it with flame shooting, but because its only 1 cylinder and there's no spark at all, antilag is like retarding the timing so that some fuel exits the exhaust from all the cylinders to put more cha cha in the car.

The main damage is probably to the manifold and exhaust turbine. The main function is to eliminate fuel cut at red line, so the vehicle does not loose power as vehicle stays in red line.

Using bee*r with a pfc allows you to see the fantastic knock numbers produced.

And it does cut fuel ASWELL as spark.

my pfc and bee-r never actually gave me any big knock readings, but when you hit the bee-r limiter the engine check light did come on, im assuming its because the pfc is detecting a error in the ignition which is what the bee-r is designed for.

i had mine installed for good launches on boost, but turns out my car is responsive enough not to need it

my pfc and bee-r never actually gave me any big knock readings, but when you hit the bee-r limiter the engine check light did come on, im assuming its because the pfc is detecting a error in the ignition which is what the bee-r is designed for.

i had mine installed for good launches on boost, but turns out my car is responsive enough not to need it

when i had mine both connected i had high knock readings and yer a couple months down the track blew the rings on my motor :)

What it does is confuse the CAS sensor, thus not allowing the PFC or Engine comp to know when to fire the coils.

The knock values only show up when there is a big back fire and it's only the shock of the fire ball in your exhaust that is making that knock.

If you tune the gain on the Bee*R down to a reasonably level, it doesn't really sound any different to your normal fuel cut limiter.

I can build about 5 psi at 0 kph with the Bee*R. lift hand brake, depress right foot, stutter stutter, boost up.

It's tops..... but traction is a litle bit of a problem. I'll be hooking up to the clutch before deca.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...