Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys just wanted to know do you rev match when down gearing???

If so do u do it coz its fun or just trying to extend the life of your clutches???

been told that if your not rev matching and down gear as your releasing the clutch slowly so its not a harsh gear change your actually riding the clutch.

True or a lie?

I rev match every now and then if im not feeling lazy but at times just shift normally.

ta

Ash

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180987-rev-matching-when-down-shifting/
Share on other sites

Its the job of the synchros to "synchronize" the engine and road speed on gearshifts. So if you were blipping the throttle to match engine/road speed then you are saving wear on synchros.

Personally, its second nature to me. Not because I'm a track racer (never been on one) but because I am a truck driver and half my works fleet have non synchro boxes.

I do it. As other people have said it provides less strain on drivetrain and makes car more stable, plus sounds good.

I dont do it all the time, just when coming to quicker then normal stop or givin it a squirt through corners

hmmm kool

i cant heal toe as yet. i normall put the clutch in tap the accelerator and let of the clutch. my feet are to small to heel toe lol

but ye thanks for clearing that up for me

your feet must be really small if you cant heel toe...ha. if you dont know already, its exactly what the term says, you place your toes close to the edge of the brake pedal instead of fully on and then blip with your heel. comes with practice.

i havent done track yet, first one will be next month, but i normaly do it when i enter a corner at high speeds during spritited driving. i find doing it in normal driving doesnt do it for me...lol

who here actually double clutch when heel toeing? ive been practicing that alot lately.

heel toeing is good fun, makes your driving smoother (good for the car and your passengers) and helps you take corners faster.

I use it everyday at least a couple of times, but I don't use the gears to slow down the car when coming to a set of lights for example. Gears are for going, not slowing down the car. I only use heel toeing when approaching a corner i intend to power through :)

Just press the brake pedal as you normally do (with your toes), clutch in, then twist your heel around and give the accelerator a blip, clutch out. Over time you'll get used to the sound of your engine and know instinctively when to release the clutch to make a smooth gear change without even looking at the rev meter.

The twisting of the foot feels awkward at first, but it's great fun once you've got it. I wouldn't recommend trying this on a busy street though, you'll probably brake too hard the first few times, etc.

good luck with it :(

hmmm kool

i cant heal toe as yet. i normall put the clutch in tap the accelerator and let of the clutch. my feet are to small to heel toe lol

but ye thanks for clearing that up for me

No such thing as foot too small unless if your foot is like 5cm long or something. I've got size 13 feet, and they're too big. I can't 'heal toe' properly in the skyline. I more so press both pedals with different edges of my foot.

Smaller feet make it easier.

E.g. I can heal toe in a fangadore easily because its bigger

I find it's more of "heel - side-of-foot-ing" - I tend to roll my ankle so the side of my foot contacts the throttle pedal.

It has become second nature to do it now - so much so that when I drive an auto (I drive autos like a manual) I heel-toe the throttle on down-changes :P

It has become second nature to do it now - so much so that when I drive an auto (I drive autos like a manual) I heel-toe the throttle on down-changes :P

lol, and how does that work for ya? it would still lurch forward if you put it from D3 into D2 or whatever right? :laughing-smiley-014:

TBH, i've never tried it in an auto.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep super expensive, awesome. It would be a cool passion project if I had the money.
    • Getting the setup right, is likely to cost multiples of the purchase price of the vehicle.
    • So it's a ginormous undertaking that will be a massive headache but will be sorta cool if pulled off right. And also expensive. I'm sure it'll be as expensive as buying the car itself. I don't think you could just do this build without upgrading other things to take the extra power. Probably lots of custom stuff as well. All this assuming the person has mechanical knowledge. I'm stupid enough to try it but smart enough to realize there's gonna be mistakes even with an experienced mechanic. I'm a young bloke on minimum wage that gets dopamine from air being moved around and got his knowledge from a Donut video on how engines work.]   Thanks for the response though super informative!
    • Yes, it is entirely possible to twincharge a Skyline. It is not....without problems though. There was a guy did it to an SOHC RB30 (and I think maybe it became or already was a 25/30) in a VL Commode. It was a monster. The idea is that you can run both compressors at relatively low pressure ratios, yet still end up with a quite large total pressure ratio because they multiply, not add, boost levels. So, if the blower is spun to give a 1.4:1 PR (ie, it would make ~40 kPa of boost on its own) and the turbo is set up to give a 1.4:1 PR also, then you don't get 40+40 = 80 kPa of boost, you get 1.4*1.4, which is pretty close to 100 kPa of boost. It's free real estate! This only gets better as the PRs increase. If both are set up to yield about 1.7 PR, which is only about 70 kPa or 10ish psi of boost each, you actually end up with about 1.9 bar of boost! So, inevitably it was a bit of a monster. The blower is set up as the 2nd compressor, closest to the motor, because it is a positive displacement unit, so to get the benefit of putting it in series with another compressor, it has to go second. If you put it first, it has to be bigger, because it will be breathing air at atmospheric pressure. The turbo's compressor ends up needing to be a lot larger than you'd expect, and optimised to be efficient at large mass flows and low PRs. The turbo's exhaust side needs to be quite relaxed, because it's not trying to provide the power to produce all the boost, and it has to handle ALL the exhaust flow. I think you need a much bigger wastegate than you might expect. Certainly bigger than for an engine just making the same power level turbo only. The blower effectively multiplies the base engine size. So if you put a 1.7 PR blower on a 2.5L Skyline, it's like turboing a 4.2L engine. Easy to make massive power. Plus, because the engine is blown, the blower makes boost before the turbo can even think about making boost, so it's like having that 4.2L engine all the way from idle. Fattens the torque delivery up massively. But, there are downsides. The first is trying to work out how to size the turbo according to the above. The second is that you pretty much have to give up on aircon. There's not enough space to mount everything you need. You might be able to go elec power steering pump, hidden away somewhere. but it would still be a struggle to get both the AC and the blower on the same side of the engine. Then, you have to ponder whether you want to truly intercool the thing. Ideally you would put a cooler between the turbo and the blower, so as to drop the heat out of it and gain even more benefit from the blower's positive displacement nature. But that would really need to be a water to air core, because you're never going to find enough room to run 2 sets of boost pipes out to air to air cores in the front of the car. But you still need to aftercool after the blower, because both these compressors will add a lot of heat, and you wil have the same temperature (more or less) as if you produced all that boost with a single stage, and no one in their right mind would try to run a petrol engine on high boost without a cooler (unless not using petrol, which we shall ignore for the moment). I'm of the opinnion that 2x water to air cores in the bay and 2x HXs out the front is probably the only sensible way to avoid wasting a lot of room trying to fit in long runs of boost pipe. But the struggle to locate everything in the limited space available would still be a pretty bad optimisation problem. If it was an OEM, they'd throw 20 engineers at it for a year and let them test out 30 ideas before deciding on the best layout. And they'd have the freedom to develop bespoke castings and the like, for manifolds, housings, connecting pipes to/from compressors and cores. A single person in a garage can either have one shot at it and live with the result, or spend 5 years trying to get it right.
    • Good to know, thank you!
×
×
  • Create New...