Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ive changed question to now to if a r34 frontcut be suitable for a rb25det to rb25de conversion as i found a cheap statuatory r34 writeoff for sale. i dont want to hear anything about its a waste of time, buy n/a skyline etc. just want to know if r34 is suitable or would it have problems

Edited by gach2

Cost vs gain = Cheaper to purchase the N/A and drive it for 3 years.

Swapping out a motor is going to cost you a lot more than the car is worth.

Just to get around the laws isnt a good reason to waste money when there is a cheaper & easier alternative right infront of you.

Plus R33's in 3 years time are going to be 10k or less, and R34's will be at the prices R33's are at now.

Just buy a shitbox to drive around till you get off your P's... Or just buy a non-turbo skyline, and then buy a turbo skyline when you get off your P's? Turbo skylines will be even cheaper when you get off your P's because R33 GTS-T's are dropping in value all the time.

Im confused by your reason for buying a turbo :P

n/a r33s are around 10-15k in sydney

ive been offered an gtst r33 for around 5k (needs compliance plate to be redone which ive been told by rta is only engineerin plate as the car has been previously registered in nsw)

would someone please tell me all parts

Edited by gach2

Like everyone else has said, the money could be spent elsewhere.

Can you rego a car that has had the compliance plates removed? Not rego without a plate, but make another for it?

yes it can be regoed

all it needs is a engineering cert or plate (forgot what its called in nsw) which is around 700

after that all it needs is blue slip and then it can be regoed

the car was registered in nsw for over a year. if not recompliancing it would be an issue

does anyone actually know what parts are going to be needed for the conversion

i did speak to my mechanic before about putting rb25de in a vl and he said it was gonna cost around 1500 labour and parts but that was just hypothetical at the time. im assuming this will be similar or even cheaper on a r33. does anyone here actually knows anything about the conversion and parts required.

Edited by gach2

Mate if you look around people won't be getting 15K for an NA R33. I've seen them for sale for around $8-12k, and they wouldnt be getting the asking price either. Just look around, or buy an R31.

I can guarantee you by the end of your P-plater days, you will have gotten sick of the R33 and will be looking to get a new car.

Therefore doing all this conversion work will be a waste of money. You probably won't even be bothered to put the RB25DET back in.

would someone just answer his f**king question?

its working out cheaper for him, let it go. im sure he knows its not the best way to go but hes playing the hand he was dealt.

you'll need:

-n/a headers + exhaust.

-n/a ecu (and afm- double check that)

-re-circulating or blocked off oil and water lines.

the water lines can be fed into each other.

-oil drain needs to be blocked off.

-n/a intake pipe.

thats all off the top of my head. you'll still need to get the work engineered for the RTA to pass it as an N/A.

ring the RTA and ask them if you're allowed to do that first (as you were advised in your other thread).

thanks security finally someone answered the question

that doesnt seem like its going to cost that much

i got time so i can look around the for sale section for parts till i source them

im probably going wait couple of weeks before i decide if to go this path so if a n/a r32 or r33 comes up in my price range id prob go for that.

also the car will be p plate legal after i notify the rta of the engine change. the guy on the phone said engineering would not be necessary as rb25de came on similar model but id need a eng cert as the car doesn't have compliance plates so id probably get it wit engine change just to be safe.

Taso84 i was thinking that but then again id find trouble findin n/a r33 lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...