Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah but Mark tunes in 4th gear so its not a direct comparison. Good luck tomm. who is crunching the numbers?

EDIT: ohh i see where you are coming from...pick both the Mark tuned 22-25psi runs out of the dyno computer...got it.

Unigroup, you cant say no to the Autronic experience and neither can I

Yeah ive got a figure in my head, will go to 2bar if needed to get it as long as nothing goes wrong.

  • Replies 682
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Unigroup, you cant say no to the Autronic experience and neither can I

Yeah ive got a figure in my head, will go to 2bar if needed to get it as long as nothing goes wrong

i hope thats racefuel...i strongly recommend not exceeding 24psi on pump.

Im glad your going to Yavus...he's a gun Autronic tuner.

Edited by DiRTgarage
i hope thats racefuel...i strongly recommend not exceeding 24psi on pump.

Im glad your going to Yavus...he's a gun Autronic tuner.

All pump all the way

Jungle juice isnt my sort of thing, yet.

From looking through as many GTRS graphs as i can find on the net its going to be a 22psi tune that gets me the right number, have to remember though;

-Not the right port job on current head for huge numbers, its more for response

-Quite possibly bad choice of cam profiles

-Increased capacity *Throws up RB30 gang signs*

Very happy though that you paved the way so to speak with the low mounts

All pump all the way

Jungle juice isnt my sort of thing, yet.

From looking through as many GTRS graphs as i can find on the net its going to be a 22psi tune that gets me the right number, have to remember though;

-Not the right port job on current head for huge numbers, its more for response

-Quite possibly bad choice of cam profiles

-Increased capacity *Throws up RB30 gang signs*

Very happy though that you paved the way so to speak with the low mounts

you know i will help you when and where i can.

Much appreciated Paul, as always :/

Paul is the kind of guy would would bend over backwards for anyone and then tell you that it was nothing to him for helping you out when you say thankyou.

Thanks for going out today and doing that for me Paul, I did not expect it and I still cannot believe you went out of the house for me, also the assistance you you gave when I was tryin to get my car ready for power cruise was a very big help. If it was'nt for you and Wayne @ Hunter all wheel dyno then i would not have been ready for power cruise.

Thanks mate. Keep up the good work.

Paul is the kind of guy would would bend over backwards for anyone and then tell you that it was nothing to him for helping you out when you say thankyou.

Thanks for going out today and doing that for me Paul, I did not expect it and I still cannot believe you went out of the house for me, also the assistance you you gave when I was tryin to get my car ready for power cruise was a very big help. If it was'nt for you and Wayne @ Hunter all wheel dyno then i would not have been ready for power cruise.

Thanks mate. Keep up the good work.

Hey..no problem mate...just had to hold my nuts while i was standing or walked. Im not as much of a karnt as i portray myself as...im more a cheeky larrikin with a good heart...who loves his family, his mates and his cars. Ill help anyone out as long as i know they will appreciate it when the job is done. Hey ive even done engine builds for next to nothing to help a guy out....no problem.

Edited by DiRTgarage
Hey..no problem mate...just had to hold my nuts while i was standing or walked. Im not as much of a karnt as i portray myself as...im more a cheeky larrikin with a good heart...who loves his family, his mates and his cars. Ill help anyone out as long as i know they will appreciate it when the job is done. Hey ive even done engine builds for next to nothing to help a guy out....no problem.

Its true, you are a nice guy Paul :)

Can you help me out with a free engine build? - I would really appreciate it :/

(in all seriousness, its good to hear youre ok and that your "gentlemans region" is all still intact).

Its true, you are a nice guy Paul :)

Can you help me out with a free engine build? - I would really appreciate it :/

(in all seriousness, its good to hear youre ok and that your "gentlemans region" is all still intact).

You break it first then we will talk. :P

Its a pity you wont be seeing it in action at Powercruise (engine) but im sure there will be plenty of footage, it will be one of the loudest RBs there :/

2rismo is going to organise me wheelchair access. what day is best...Saturday?

Its a pity you wont be seeing it in action at Powercruise (engine) but im sure there will be plenty of footage, it will be one of the loudest RBs there :/

Who's will be the loudest? yours? lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...