Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, i have a 94 skyline r33 gtst-auto. my mods are xforce turboback exhaust, blitz lm podfilter, greddy fmic, turbosmart dual stage boost controller, and greddy e-manage. the car was boosted to 14psi, and made 209.5kw at da rears. What do u think? and is 14psi 2 high?, i dnt noramlly hit 14psi unless im dragging some1 which is rare. cars normally crusing at round 9psi.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/184393-dyno-result-it-what-do-u-think/
Share on other sites

hey guys, i have a 94 skyline r33 gtst-auto. my mods are xforce turboback exhaust, blitz lm podfilter, greddy fmic, turbosmart dual stage boost controller, and greddy e-manage. the car was boosted to 14psi, and made 209.5kw at da rears. What do u think? and is 14psi 2 high?, i dnt noramlly hit 14psi unless im dragging some1 which is rare. cars normally crusing at round 9psi.

id say put the boost down before you shit your turbo. Id also say your kilowatt reading is on par for your mods

:D

happy dyno :D

bit like the dyno you use is it Mafia?

why make stupid remarks? the power seems ok seeing as its running aftermarket ecu (sort of)

and the stock converters and trans dont rob that much power.

if he had a high stall i would call BS but otherwise i say well done.

bit like the dyno you use is it Mafia?

why make stupid remarks? the power seems ok seeing as its running aftermarket ecu (sort of)

and the stock converters and trans dont rob that much power.

if he had a high stall i would call BS but otherwise i say well done.

Dyno I use is unhappy. Cars coming off this Mainline and going onto Dyno dynamics are running 20rwkw more.

So no, its not a stupid remark. But then again, he is running 14psi (which will make his turbo take a dump)

9rwkw is a fair bit of power for the auto to take, so a manual on his engine would make 223rwkw with the stock turbo? I don't think so.

A lot of tuners like to make high false readings so that young fellas get their wallets out faster. Seen it a million times.

id say put the boost down before you shit your turbo. Id also say your kilowatt reading is on par for your mods

:P

I'm planning on adding an SAFCII to my R33 and pumping the stock turbo to 14psi.

U saying i need a new turbo then? :unsure:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...