Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeh i took my new 33 for a speed test, i got to 190 before shitting my pants and slowing down for the corner (soft i know)

not sure wat revs i was on, but it felt f**king fast on a bumpy country road with coilovers

lol... when you DO get your license, make sure you get a daewoo. Its about the only car you should ever touch... and when you get that thing to 260... and the rattlles start... then maybe you can think of upgrading... to an excel

noob

sell your car and buy a scooter. would suit a guy with ur inteligence...so was the drunken idiot the driver or the one playing with straws...

It turns out that the rattling wasnt related to the speed as much as the 7 trillion mc donalds straws that my dunken idiot friend thought it would be a good idea to stick down the vents.

This is still going :) . Straws eh???? punch your friend for having no respect for your Hyundai and tell him to stop stealing from your work. Remember to wear safety glasses, one of those straws could take an eye out

the unfortunate thing is some poor noob is going to search for "Air conditioner rattle" and come up with this thread and go looking for straws in the AC vents.

lol

:( I didn't think of that. haha

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...