Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I saw someone else in this thread asking for vehicle details using the VIN for a stag, so I'm hoping I can do the same - it's NM35315451 - checkitout.com.au doesn't give me anything. It's a car I'm thinking about purchasing, and just trying to find out a little more about it before going to look.

Cheers.

I saw someone else in this thread asking for vehicle details using the VIN for a stag, so I'm hoping I can do the same - it's NM35315451 - checkitout.com.au doesn't give me anything. It's a car I'm thinking about purchasing, and just trying to find out a little more about it before going to look.

Cheers.

I hope you are not in Australia Richard because that is a VQ25DD engine in that there 250RS four.

Not eligible for compliance.

Otherwise;

March '02 build

No HICAS

Cold pack option

and another option that I do not know (Code: GLSSW)

EDIT: I suppose if it was a private import that is already in the country, then you would be fine

Edited by iamhe77
I hope you are not in Australia Richard because that is a VQ25DD engine in that there 250RS four.

Not eligible for compliance.

Hmm that's interesting - this is the car for sale here: http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Nissan-M35-STAGEA-2...7QQcmdZViewItem

As you can see, it's listed and being sold as a turbo.

BTW what's a cold pack? I've only just discovered the Stagea in the last couple of days and I've been devouring all the info I can find as it's fired my interest.

Hmm that's interesting - this is the car for sale here: http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Nissan-M35-STAGEA-2...7QQcmdZViewItem

As you can see, it's listed and being sold as a turbo.

BTW what's a cold pack? I've only just discovered the Stagea in the last couple of days and I've been devouring all the info I can find as it's fired my interest.

Oops. Sorry mate, dyslexia starting to kick in :rofl:

It is a 250t RS Four

again, March '02 build

again, No HICAS

post-31842-1246424732_thumb.jpg

Don't know what the options are though, maybe someone here that can read Japanese can tell you.

id say wrong number

the pics are showing an RX turbo (seats have electric adjustment, plus rear facing vents in the back) but fast is showing an RS

Agreed.

Perhaps give Carizma a call to let them know that either their pics or the VIN they have listed is incorrect.

Edited by iamhe77
It is a 250t RS Four

again, March '02 build

again, No HICAS

i meant where you confirmed the above details as an RS four, when the picture you posted clearly states RX four :rofl:

yup. go sleep mate hahah you can FAST your heart out tomorrow

i meant where you confirmed the above details as an RS four, when the picture you posted clearly states RX four :rofl:

yup. go sleep mate hahah you can FAST your heart out tomorrow

I know what you meant.

What I am saying is that the details are for an 250t RS Four, but the pics are for an RX four.

We actually agree, but it seems that you are having a bit of trouble accepting this.

im lost!

i was just pointing out you wrote RS when i think you meant RX. no big deal. go sleep mate lol

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.... *sigh*

the first incorrect VIN I put in was for an RS.

(it is right about now I am so glad that my hours are extended until 6pm :rofl: )

My apologies for the confusion Richard.

no worries, I think I get the drift!

I might go check it out this weekend - anything else I should look out for while I'm there, seeing I'm a newbie to these things? Is there any easy way to tell if a particular vehicle has the side airbags installed and not just the drivers and passengers front airbags?

yup!

there will be 'airbag' or 'SRS' above where the seatbelt attaches to the B pillar. also i think on the A pillar. i cant remember........

just check the usual wear on the pedals, make sure it looks like it lines up with the amount of ks on the car. check for unusual sounds, especially in wheel bearings... also any harsh sounds coming from the turbo, hi-pitched squealing etc....

from the pics it looks clean and tidy!

It is a 250t RS Four

again, March '02 build

again, No HICAS

post-31842-1246424732_thumb.jpg

Should be RX - have another look at the FAST info you attached (this is what Iain was referring to, not the pics from ebay).

Excuse me for pointing this out - it was starting to get confusing...

Perhaps give Carizma a call to let them know that either their pics or the VIN they have listed is incorrect.

again, looking at the FAST info above, the VIN does in fact appear to be correct.

Yeah, thanks Steve.

I am well aware what Iain was referring to and I did realise the error of my ways - check out my post 3 above yours.

(has been a very long and rather arduous week - and it's only Wednesday!)

I mixed up the 5 and the 1 when I originally put in the VIN which caused me to site that it was a VQ25DD, this is what I was referring to.

I thought I was clear in explaining my errors. Perhaps not. Maybe Nick will delete/edit the confusing posts to make it clearer?

haha sorry cam i didnt mean to hassle you that much :)

Haha! Nah man, no sweat.

You were just trying to tell me I missed something, and then that I missed that I missed something, and then that I was ignoring that I missed that I missed something...

...and I STILL didn't catch on! :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks for all that information I appreciate it. To answer your questions: - Yep that's what I mean. These guys are professional painters to so I must be missing something. It's a bit hard to explain. - With the primer landing on clearcoat, I make sure that the surrounding clearcoat is scuffed to 240 grit as my epoxy primer says that I only need to sand the area to 240 grit. - Yeah so similar to the first question, assuming that the paint landed on the unscuffed clearcoat because I've seen that happen. - Yep I want to prep the surface in that order. Only reason because epoxy primer will protect it from rust and I need that atm with this crappy Sydney weather. I think I was worried about time, if I try to put the filler down but screw it up somehow and I don't have time to sand it off and reapply it then need to put primer later that it might start to rust again so I wanted to apply the primer as quick as possible to not deal with rust.  - My car has heaps of small dents, that definitely need filler but are you also sanding the area to 240 grit to fill it in with filler? I always thought you have to go to bare metal for filler to stick but that contradicts the point then that you can put filler on epoxy primer.  If you aren't going to bare metal, AND not putting epoxy primer how are you making the dent stick to the paint?
    • I did. I went to a suspension guy and he told me because I don't have adjustable camber arms it's the reason why my car veers towards the left if I take my hands off the wheel but if I drive my other every day car and take my hands off the steering wheel it goes completely straight. I think it's common with Skyline's. In order to fix the problem, I likely need gktech camber arms then nismo bushes since I have poly bushes atm, then a wheel alignment after that. With my car if I take my hands off the steering wheel on a really bumpy road before stopping at a light I have to hold my steering wheel somewhat tight otherwise my car will legit just go completely in the other direction quite quickly and I'll slam into something lol instead of stopping straight. I Believe this YouTuber had the same issue and fixed it with gktech arms. At timestmap 6:05 he talks about how the car doesn't veer anymore after installing these arms.  
    • hello! does anyone have a schematic that shows how to test the blower motor resistor for the vac system? i believe the part# is 27761-15U00. I think the resistor is toast, but would like to be able to test it somehow before i embark on the journey to find a new one. cheers! 27761-15U00
    • I don't know the answer to this, but did you have a look at the parts diagrams on amayama.com and see what they list around it for your car? As an example this should be it on my car. That's how I would check for required clips and things like that. But, I take no responsibility for you ending up with a box full of random OEM hoses, washers and clips after going down that path a few times. This definitely has never happened to me  
    • Most driving should* be done on one side of single lane divided roads. In the RHD world, you drive on the left side of the dividing line and the road is probably cambered equally on both sides. So your side of the road slopes away to the left. The same is true for the LHD world, just everything swapped to the other side and opposite slope. With a perfectly neutral, straight ahead wheel alignment designed to drive straight on a perfectly flat surface (or at least one that is level on the left-right axis, even if it has some slope in the fore-aft axis) you will not be able to drive on a cambered road without the car wanting to drift down the camber. You will need to add steering input in the opposite direction all the time. This is annoying. The solution has always been to set the camber and/or the caster to produce a continuous turning force in the opposite direction of the camber. The car will drive straight on the kind of camber for which it was set up, presumably as described in the top paragraph. But.... when the car is set up this way, as soon as you get into a lane, usually on a multi-lane surface road or highway, where the camber is not as presumed during setup, the car will usually pull to one side. In the RHD world, if you are in the fast lane on a big divided road, you are probably on the opposite camber compared to what the car was set up for (ie, sloping down to the right) and the combination of the setup and that camber will make the car want to go right pretty hard. Even a perfectly flat lane will tend to want to go right. There's no getting around it. Civil engineers who know their stuff (which is not an assumption that can always be made) will attempt to keep the variation in camber across a multi-lane road as small as possible, and if they can will attempt to make the fast lane as close to flat, or even cambered in the same direction as all the other lanes. This takes a lot of planning for drainage, control of levels, ability to deal with the elevation changes that occur at road junctions, etc etc. So it's not trivial to get it right. When they do make it work, then the annoyance is reduced, along with tyre wear, fuel consumption, etc. In theory, the civil engineers are supposed to worry about those aspects of road design also. * This used to be true, but now with very large highway systems, even just multi-lane surface roads running everywhere, it is less true now than it was, but the old assumption is the basis for describing the phenomenon, so let's just run with it for the moment.
×
×
  • Create New...