Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if you wanna buy a turbo but can't coz of p-plate laws etc then don't get a n/a skyline!!

trust me you'll get sick of it pretty quickly, everytime you drive next a turbo skyline you'll be like oh wish my skyline was turbo etc...

as others already said get something else, maybe a GTi corolla or something like that. even a v6 commo would be alright and would go harder than a N/A skyline

good luck :whoops:

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

for all you peoples that are bagging out n/a's STOP IT

UR ARE FULL OF SHITE! i own a r34 n/a and i love her to bits, i could have brought a gtt but i didnt want to, i didnt want to wrap myself around a tree...................people on there p's should learn how to drive first, so if it means getting a n/a so be it. there are too many kids getting off there p's going and getting high powered turbo cars and either killing themselves or having a very serious accident.

if you have nothing nice to say about non turbo then SHUT THE F#@K UP, i hate turbo cars but i will not bag them out. respect peoples decisions and their rides.

first of all - you don't have to be over 30 years old to know how to drive a fast car

2nd - you don't have to be driving a powerful car to wrap yourself around a pole

3rd - learning to drive in a piece of shit and then driving a powerful car is the same as going straight on to a fast car.

why "learn how to drive" in a slow gutless car when you can learn in a faster car and speed up your driving skills?

you can kill yourself even when riding a pushbike. you don't have to be driving an veyron to be in danger on the roads...

THe first post.. I thought it was pretty obvious. You said skyline's (One would assume you mean all) lack the qualities for good track/twisty work..

Does Bathurst mean anything to you? The list goes on.. I'm not here to say skyline's are some ultimate machine.

Someone needs to invent a version of Godwin's Law for Skyline otaku and calling Bathurst. :whoops: It also conveniently ignores the fact that the Nissan teams had a much higher budget than most of the teams driving local machinery (the GT-R was a 911-priced vehicle racing against Holdens and Fords), which helps a great deal in racing.

Were you going to break out the old story that the GT-R was the first "production car" to break 8 minutes at the Nordschleife too? Sure it wasn't actually in production trim, but don't let that get in the way of a good yarn.

Secondly, one would only assume I "mean all Skylines" if they were incapable of understanding context. Try reading my post again, this time at a high school level of English.

My first paragraph clearly says that I'm talking about NA Skylines, and is a pretty short summary. The second paragraph goes into a bit more depth. Especially since the post I quoted is specifically limited to talking about non-turbo Skylines and I was replying directly to that.

Buy a datto 1600.... N/a but light, heaps of fun, easy to mod and you won't lose money on it. Buy a turbo (real :whoops:) Skyline when you can legally drive it.

No offence to na drivers, just my 2c

i didnt want to wrap myself around a tree

You shouldn't have bought a RWD car, then.

With a FWD car you're more likely to go head-first into a tree, but a RWD's greater tendency to oversteer means "wrapping" is a more likely scenario.

if you have nothing nice to say about non turbo then SHUT THE F#@K UP, i hate turbo cars but i will not bag them out. respect peoples decisions and their rides.

You haven't been on the Internet for very long, have you?

This is a discussion forum. That means you're going to get discussions, which will have multiple points of view. If you've got a problem with other people's opinions (and you can't respect their decision to vocalise them) you can always be proactive and unsubscribe from the thread.

I started with an N14 pulsar. Pretty quick for a hatch (had Sr20) and if you do some suspension work it can be heapsa fun. Because it felt heaps quicker around the twisties than my r32 gts-t does. Oh and there dirt cheap, I sold mine for 7k with a heap of mods.

You shouldn't have bought a RWD car, then.

With a FWD car you're more likely to go head-first into a tree, but a RWD's greater tendency to oversteer means "wrapping" is a more likely scenario.

You haven't been on the Internet for very long, have you?

This is a discussion forum. That means you're going to get discussions, which will have multiple points of view. If you've got a problem with other people's opinions (and you can't respect their decision to vocalise them) you can always be proactive and unsubscribe from the thread.

My point of view.. You are portraying N/A skylines completely negatively, when there are many positives.

Secondly.. You are gay lol thread over, I directed the first insult, a Mod should snap on this now and close it.

:sorcerer:

Ok, let's just say that skylines overall are great cars.... but a turbo RB will always be quicker and therefore more fun than an NA. Please don't start arguing about modified NAs with everything done to them.... forced induction = more power = more fun. They really are too heavy for a small capacity NA motor, so go for something a bit more exciting and lighter.... I might get flamed for this, but v-tec Honda's are fun and P-plate legal.... but I still say go the 1600.

LOL

I'm glad I got my P plates before the laws kicked in,

I'll be even more glad when I get off them in feb.

If you really want a skyline, get a skyline! I had an N/A R33 before my GT-T and it was a good car

night time curfews suck hard :)

My point of view.. You are portraying N/A skylines completely negatively, when there are many positives.

Given that we're talking about this:

I could care less about straight line power..Twisties/track is where the real fun is at.

I'm struggling to think of one "positive" a NA Skyline has. Especially when Kevin84 was initially asking if he should buy a NA Skyline over other NA vehicles he could consider.

I'll concur that the NA Skyline, having less weight up the front, should turn in and change direction a little better than a turbo Skyline (all else being equal) and will have far better throttle response and more linear power delivery but, compared to the other NA cars Kevin said he was considering the GTS has still got a big, long, cast iron lump hanging past the front struts. And a pretty long wheelbase. It doesn't add up to a car that's going to want to change directions.

As a car for the twisties, I'm not seeing the positives over an SR20DE powered S13, Pulsar SSS, a EK Civic DC2 Integra VTiR, Mazda MX5, or a Peugeot 205 GTi (all of which should be starting at around the AUD$10K mark). If you're not caring about straight line power, the cars I've listed are far more chuckable by virtue of their weight and short wheelbase.

Go to $15K range and you're into RenaultSport Clio territory, which has the R33 GTS (and most production cars) beat on the ability to get from one end of the twisties to the other in the least amount of time, while putting the biggest smile on the dial.

So, as a twisties/track car (and, for the latter, trust me when I tell you that you need power) what positive does the GTS have?

So, as a twisties/track car (and, for the latter, trust me when I tell you that you need power) what positive does the GTS have?

A good base by which to start for those new to the skyline scene. It is an average track/twist car at best, but that's what you pay for. You're mistaken if you think I've made it out as some awesome track machine.

Other benefits include

- The looks of a skyline

- The potential to be a reasonably competitive track/streeter with work (suspension etc or even a turbo for a nice high comp hard pulling car with minimal lag.

- Most of the features that many other skylines have.. LSD, ATTESA etc

- Better fuel economy than most other turbo cars out there under the same price range

- A great base for those new to the skyline scene, to learn the inner workings of RB'S and the rest of the car come time to buying a turbo if you want.

- Cheaper to insure

- Lower maint costs

You need to stop looking at the GTS as a car by which you want to get the absolute most out of for street/track performance.

And on a side note they're great fun to wipe the smile's off rx8 owner's faces :)

they are a good starting point as a first car, respond well to suspension mods, and have alot of variety in aftermarket bits.

it's a good stepping stone if you intend on going for something with more power down the line - and admittedly you can never have enough.

definitely would be in a much better position going from an na skyline to a 200+rwkw rwd car, than someone who's gone from a corolla into a 200+rwkw car.

it's a progressive thing that builds on both the car and driver. the myriad of parts available is definitely a buying factor to consider, back then it was more financially viable to sell an NA and buy a GTST. with all the turbo motors getting rebuilt nowadays, along with a large supply of caliper/rotor combos available; you can do all the suspension mods you want while on Ps, and rebuild a motor to throw in when you're off onto opens.

Buy a shitbox gemini or something that will be cheap to replace when you write it off.

p platers are shit drivers. Fact.

now lets not have a bunch of 18 year olds come in here and complain about that comment like i just f**ked their mum.

why do insurance companies have p plate excesses? Cause p platers crash too often. It takes a few years to really be safe on the roads. Not a few weeks.

i wrote off my first car, as did many people i know and would always recommend buying something cheap as a first car.

Buy a shitbox gemini or something that will be cheap to replace when you write it off.

p platers are shit drivers. Fact.

now lets not have a bunch of 18 year olds come in here and complain about that comment like i just f**ked their mum.

why do insurance companies have p plate excesses? Cause p platers crash too often. It takes a few years to really be safe on the roads. Not a few weeks.

i wrote off my first car, as did many people i know and would always recommend buying something cheap as a first car.

Isn't one of the guys racing in V8 Supercars on their P's (probably off by now, but he was doing pretty well when he was still on P's). ;)

dont get a non turbo skyline on your Ps. Save the money that would have been wasted on insurance for when your off your Ps and can legal drive a turbo.

and if youd like to know, after 3 years on full comp, its about $7k on insurance...

get something thats cheap and only need 3rd party insurance to cover you. like perhaps a VP Commodore for just an example. $250 insurance per year 3rd party. can find them for about $2k+.

add what you saved on buying a commodore and what you saved on insurance... thats a fair bit of cash!!!

Edited by Freddy Kruger
Other benefits include

OK, lets go through your "benefits as a twisties/track vehicle".

The looks of a skyline

Oh-kay. How does "looks" make it go any faster through the twisties or track? :D

-The potential to be a reasonably competitive track/streeter with work (suspension etc or even a turbo for a nice high comp hard pulling car with minimal lag.

I'm still not seeing how a big, fat, front heavy, car is still better than a lighter and shorter car as a base for modifying. Its not like the Silvia or Integra are missing a solid aftermarket range, and so they can get suspension work done.

You've still yet to address my concerns that the Skyline's too long and with far too much engine in front of the front struts to have good steering response, and a lot heavier than its competitors which punishes it under brakes, on turn-in, and exacerbates the front heaviness problem when trying to change direction through a set of switchbacks.

The only way you can really "fix" that is to install a shorter, lighter motor. Which defeats the purpose of buying the Skyline in the first place.

-Most of the features that many other skylines have.. LSD, ATTESA etc

He's not comparing it to other Skylines. He's comparing it to other cars.

-Better fuel economy than most other turbo cars out there under the same price range

- Cheaper to insure

- Lower maint costs

Once again, pretty much irrelevant to your "great for twisties" assertion.

- A great base for those new to the skyline scene, to learn the inner workings of RB'S

OK, so its a great car if you want a career as a mechanic. Its got sweet f**k all to do with being a good car for the winding road.

You need to stop looking at the GTS as a car by which you want to get the absolute most out of for street/track performance.

I will, once you take back your comment that its actually any good for street/track performance.

Half the examples you've given above is that its cheap, not fast.

And on a side note they're great fun to wipe the smile's off rx8 owner's faces

I can do that in a Mazda2 or Pulsar SSS, which don't even look like a sports cars and so are even more offensive when the RX-8 driver gets chopped.

You seriously don't know what the word context means, do you? Kevin's question is if should he buy a NA Skyline over other NA sports cars, not why he shouldn't not buy it. You've given reasons why the GTS isn't that bad, not why its better than a Silvia, Clio, Integra etc. You say its good for twisties/track, something I asked you to clarify since the laws of physics are against you, and your above "benefits" do nothing to prove it.

Edited by scathing

He's asked if he should get an NA R33/R34, and I say why not? They did make them for a reason.

I don't see why all the 'turbo owners' are saying to get a run around car for 2 years then 'upgrade', like owning an NA is some kind of taboo. (I am just generalizing with 'turbo owners' here).

Get real, a car is a car... and a non turbo skyline is that. Despite its age, it will out perform any 'run around car' and provide a solid foundation for any type of motorsport the owner chooses to do. Not to mention it's a fundamental stepping stone in providing the skills and know-how in what everyone calls 'upgrading'.

Extreme case senario; hold off on buying the 'oh so wonderful GTR' and just get a run around car, then upgrade in 50 years into your pagani zonda.

I may seem bitter, but I'm not. I can afford owning a gtst/gtr - i just choose not to. The R33 GTS does everything I require of it. If anything I've probably seen more track time than many 300HP gtst owners, so what is it exactly that you have the turbo for then? (Again generalizing with the turbo).

If we can skip all the garbage in regards to turbo vs. na; it's a never ending arguement - you will see that there's absolutely nothing wrong with owning one. I've driven a turbo, I like the turbo, but I don't feel as though I need a turbo - it's a personal preference, and people have to stop pushing their own ideals onto others.

If we can skip all the garbage in regards to turbo vs. na

But, if I don't keep trying to tell people that NA is best, they'll never learn!

I thought about it, and if I could afford two cars (daily driver runabout and a dedicated sports car) I'd get the runabout with a turbo, set up for fuel economy like the Saabs or turbo diesels) and get the sports car as NA, for the responsiveness. A dedicated sports car will be ultra lightweight anyway, so I don't need power.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...