Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just back from the tuners its like a new car just got a gt3076r installed running 16psi on low boost setting and 21psi on high boost settings. any one tell me what this dyno sheet is telling me. looks like at the top end its letting go. could this be cams?

i have all the supporting mods.

cheers

post-32900-1191075049_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/187275-just-got-r33-from-tuners/
Share on other sites

PS, i have no idea how or why Cams would give you jumpy power like that.

I really doubt that's what it is, and the power level (250) isn't anything that Cams would have a problem with.

I guess what i'm saying is that Cams could handle 2000rwkws as long as the engine and turbo were up to it.

The only reason you would change Cams is to improve power gains across the rev range etc....

Nothing wrong with standard though if you're punching more air in.

Two distinct dips but not shaky looking graph line.

I'd suspect 1-2 degrees of timing taken out to address knock. A look at your ignition map will soon tell. :)

The over 4000rpm results looks good, but what do you think about things under that engine speed? Looks a bit lazy to come on for you. This spec should be generally similar to The Mafia, and he's pulling 300kW out of 18psi + a much more linear looking curve throughout the range with the assistance of water/meth.

Edited by Dale FZ1
I'd suspect 1-2 degrees of timing taken out to address knock. A look at your ignition map will soon tell. :P
whats your timing degrees tuned at? if you take out 1 - 2 degrees timing, you will get slightly better mid range power but less peak power..

Previous posts by Murat, and the comment about "all supporting mods" indicates he has a PFC.

I'm suggesting it's in the spark mapping ie adjusting one or two specific cells in the map, not the base timing being adjusted by a degree or two :)

Could be wrong but that's where I'd look if there is a concern/query about the shape of the graph

Edited by Dale FZ1
whats your timing degrees tuned at? if you take out 1 - 2 degrees timing, you will get slightly better mid range power but less peak power..

Explain to me how removing timing is going to improve his midrange???

Id really like to know!

It looks like the exhaust housing may be to small If its not retard to much in the topend.

What sort of timing is it running through the top?? and like others have suggested what exhaust housing are you using??

core number is 700382-5012

compressor housing is .60A/R

turbine housing is .82A/R internal wastegate

if that helps is there any one i can take the car too give me a hand with the problem?

money is no problem.

dude, thats the same turbo as me. (GT3037) I make 15psi by 3900rpm in second gear.

The bigger rear must give it a bit more lag hey?

Also, can you list your supporting mods?

I make just over 300rwkw at 18psi on this turbo.

dude, thats the same turbo as me. (GT3037) I make 15psi by 3900rpm in second gear.

The bigger rear must give it a bit more lag hey?

Also, can you list your supporting mods?

I make just over 300rwkw at 18psi on this turbo.

Engine management - PFC

Boost ran - 18psi

Turbo - Garrett GT3076r

Nismo 740cc injectors

Bosch 040 pump

Gready EBC Profec II

Z32 80mm Air Flow Meter

Hybrid Intercooler

3inch Exhaust turbo back

Splitfire Coil Packs

Stock Internals

no head work

Fuel pump

its not that bad i get about 15psi by 3800rpm its depends on the engine load at the time 5th gear its full boost by 3500

thats strange, as I have almost the same setup, but with a smaller turbo rear.

That wavey line looks dodgey. Are the AFR's staying safe while it is doing that? Is the fuel pump healthy? You'll need to test your pressures.

thats strange, as I have almost the same setup, but with a smaller turbo rear.

That wavey line looks dodgey. Are the AFR's staying safe while it is doing that? Is the fuel pump healthy? You'll need to test your pressures.

AFR are safe its is running rich because after about an hour of driving the back bumper has a light black color, fuel pump was installed about 3 months ago brand new, what i will check is the cat see if it is choking and do a pressure test, i know i should be getting abit more becuase i have read your 300kw advantage this is what i have built my car from. so im abit shocked.

anything else you reckon i can check out ?

i have notice one more thing with the car the idle is very high sits at about 900 to 1000 rpm, i tried to reset it to a lower figure but it still sits up at 900 to 1000 rpm could this be a connected problem?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...