Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

dean.. con has one on his the TR43 or some shit.. external gate.. for a smallish size turbo it doesnt have anything under 3,500rpm and made 215kw with 14 or so psi... supported with a microcrap and the rest

Well our turbochargers do require a running in peroid of 1000KMs. before that has been done it will appears to be laggish as the Journal bush needs to be worn in and the core needs to be libricated by oil.

Lot of tunners dyno tune the car straight after the turbo's installation and obviously it will not give the best result. The power out put of the car also depends on the tunner.

the turbo has been on for more than 1000ks.. ok its a cheap turbo and bang for your buck.. but for a smallish turbo on a 25det with supporting mods, im unimpressed.. but it does have good torque

We just made 230kws on 14psi with a fully standard engine, Stock cams, Stock AFM, Stock injectors. Please PM me a copy of the dyno read out, I'm really ken to see it. For some reasons I believe the turbo that you dynoed was a TR44 or might be not one of our turbos.

Also just want yous to see a comparison between a 440HP Ball Bearing turbo on a RB25det with a Our TR43 on a CA18det and TR43 on a RB25det

440HPBB RB25det turbo maxed out @ 240KWs with injectors, Max boost 25PSI @ 4798RPM

RB252535.JPG

TR43 CA18det 230KWs MAX (keep in mind this is a 1.8L 4cyc engine). Max bost 25PSI @ 4658 RPM

TR432ndrunKW.JPG

TR43 RB25det 230KWs MAX Factory injectors leaned out @ 14PSI

r33250kws.JPG

Power compare with RB25det TR43 vs RB25det 440HPBB

RPM_______________3000_ 3500_ 4000_4500_5000_5500_6000_6400

TR43 Power(KW)______111__130__155__185__202__210__225__230

440HPBB Power(KW)___60___75__ 100__145__210__220__221__230

And as I repeat the TR43 RB25det fuel leaned out, and dynoed with only 14PSI.

TR28kai 340HP vs 300HPBB turbo

tr28kai15psis14.JPG

  • 2 weeks later...
dean.. con has one on his the TR43 or some shit.. external gate.. for a smallish size turbo it doesnt have anything under 3,500rpm and made 215kw with 14 or so psi... supported with a microcrap and the rest
For some reasons I believe the turbo that you dynoed was a TR44 or might be not one of our turbos.

but isnt the TR44 rated higher than the TR43?

yes. TR44 it rated 50KWs higher, Bigger, also slight laggier. Here's a dyno read of TR44. the 1J made 240kws on 14PSI@2350RPM, and 276KWs on 16PSI@2400RPM with 50Nos.

dyno_001__Large_.jpg

Edited by hypergear

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thinking is that if the O2 sensor is shot then your entire above described experience is pure placebo.
    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
×
×
  • Create New...