Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It just didn't squeel cos I'm awesome Craig :(

Seriously though that stuff helps, and also chamferring the sides of the pad with a file. Do both and follow proper bed in instructions and you have no worries

Well that depends on how cheap you want to sell it for :D

i wouldnt thats the thing. its mcf**ked. even though id sell it as that, i wouldnt want to do that

Aww your selling it!! :D But you just got the Car trailer!! :(

im re-shelling jess...........this chassis is buggered. Put 4 axle stands under her and the chassis only sits on 3

plus im stepping it up a bit. While i hav the chance, its getting cage, seam welding, coils, better wheels, and a bit more power (in the form of a TD06)

just want to mention, if your organising an sau event, please put one post in the SAU Calendar thread in the stickies:

put the date, and the title, then the link underneath, eg:

"27/10/2008: Tupperware Party

www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/omgimorganisingatupperwarepartybro.html"

how the hell do i make my Non Available power skyline sound decent and don't say turbo because ive already been through that tonight

its hard to explain the shit noise it makes , just sounds shit .

idles nice , soon as you touch the accelerator , BAM ! shit sound kicks in

Solution for NA noise making goodness.

Individual throttle bodies with velocity stacks infront of them and nothing else

Ridiculously large cams

Proper tuned length extractors and a well sized exhaust

lightest flywheel you can get

= snappy as fuck, crisp, angry sounding NA, that will still get raped by mildly worked turbos, but sound about a million times better doing it.

In all seriousness, I wouldn't bother hey :)

new exhaust dude, simple.

yer i know but i have nfi wtf to get :(

dont put a homo cheap ass cannon on it, 2.5 cat back system with a good quality rear muffler with tip/s of your choice.... should have you car sounding nothing like auto non turbo supra boat in no time :)

cheap cannon is what the previous owner put in it , welded it on to the stock system iirc , so yeah sounds like cock

i can get a jun bl muffler for like $120 second hand , how much you reckon it would be to put a new system on my car ?

just frustrated at the crappy sound my $2 tin can is making

i know that sound youre talking about Mitch, heard it on many other N/A skylines. ultimate poo.

a proper 2.5'' system with extractors, and resinator should have it sounding much better

yeah it actually pisses me off , tempted to get a stock system cause i hate it so much

i know that sound youre talking about Mitch, heard it on many other N/A skylines. ultimate poo.

a proper 2.5'' system with extractors, and resinator should have it sounding much better

yer i know but i have nfi wtf to get :)

cheap cannon is what the previous owner put in it , welded it on to the stock system iirc , so yeah sounds like cock

i can get a jun bl muffler for like $120 second hand , how much you reckon it would be to put a new system on my car ?

just frustrated at the crappy sound my $2 tin can is making

aussie dyno and tune Port Rd hindmarsh, Say your off SAU. Cheapest in town.

fisher performance did my n/a 31.. and it sounds very good.. advanced headers, 2.5" exhaust, hi flow cat, turbo mufler, and a resonator for $1000..

def happy with that.... the best part is it doesnt drone at 60, 80, or100kph

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...