Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Looks like we wont get to see this (edited since no names are mentioned) team racing when Adelaide gets a new track!

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/queen...3423209335.html

Funny how the news flash this morning showed pics of a certain Jack Daniels team.

i know your take on "statistics" and how you can make them read whatever u want. what if i posted 3000 useful posts and 100 useless posts, 95 of them in the right place? that cancels your theory out! :banana:

Got me there :yes: Its all variables and interpretation of facts :)

... but you're still a whore :P

Edited by RubyRS4

coming from a man who also says:

When asked a serious question about the state of the Australian automotive industry, he admitted he didn't care.

So he doesn't care, he just says funny things.

soooo, my mates got 20g to splash on a car, coming from a vs ss and a vs clubbie, he thinks its time for a change.....

doesnt want a 32

not keen on hmas risto

not keen on 200s

mediocre on chasers

loves ryans 33 (wanna sell?) :)

more options? he's like a kid in a candy store, wants everything and cant make up his mind

preach brotha preach!

its only been 12 months and labor has already brought us into a recession......again

at least we havent been sent off to fight someone elses war like the libs did (remember johnny arselicker howard who had his tongue firmly implanted up george dubya's arse). if you look at the happenings in the world, thats why we're headed towards a recession, in fact at the moment we're better off than a lot of countries are (including the US, where interest rates are basically 0%)

at the end of the day, liberal governments tend to look after the white collar workers (or of late they look after themselves and thats it), and labor governments look after the real workers out there, the ones out there every day slogging their guts out to earn a crust. not saying white collar workers dont have a hard time (f**k me, i wouldnt work in an office, itd drive me nuts)

im happy to say im a labor voter, and always have been. tell you what, kev was a good choice in comparison to the 1950's liberal cronies thats for sure

*edit*

Craig, maybe point him to the blue oval, 20k will get ya a good second hand XR6T

yeah we had a look at them, theres definately afew nice examples here, not much was said after

he closed the internet page though lol

sigh, me thinks just give up, let him buy another crappodore

im happy to say im a labor voter, and always have been. tell you what, kev was a good choice in comparison to the 1950's liberal cronies thats for sure

Well I can't say I'm a fan of either party.

I voted for Howard over Keating, and regretted it ever since.

I voted for Rudd over Howard, and am starting to regret it.

Basically all politicians are spineless. And if you vote only on party ideology, you're generally going to get a raw deal. No one party has ever catered to me, and thats why I'm a perpetually swinging voter*. I guess I'd better get used to the disappointment, because K. Rudd hasn't fufilled a lot of election promises, is relatively spineless when it comes to the environment, and has no bloody idea about the economy. Only a true moron would say that Labor is the cause of this economical problems, and people can't say that Howard made the deficit disappear- However the approaches to economic handling are very visible when you look at the budgets - as noted before, the libs tend to focus on the economy, and labor tends to focus on the infrastructure. Labor has an ideology of socialism (universal health care, government owned assets ala Electricity and Telecoms) where as the libs are into privatisation and divestment of potential liabilities. Neither is without fault. And neither are better for the common worker, be they blue or white collar.

At the end of the day, Howard got voted out due to moral issues. He got a bit blase with his leadership and felt he didn't have to answer to public opinion, and in the end the public tossed him out, whether it be for the children overboard nonsense or his political pandering to the racist base of Pauline Hanson, or his involvement in the farcical WMD search and subsequent invasion/occupation of Iraq. You can have as much money in the bank as you can collect, but it won't make people like you if you're a twat. I'm not sorry to see him gone, but I'm totally disappointed with Rudd. I was annoyed when howard decided to give out a baby bonus, and K.Rudd's little ploy isnt much better. Sure, I'll take that $950 off the govt (damnit I missed out on a baby bonus - r32's dont count), but I'll be paying off credit card debt- and that alone doesn't stimulate the economy (Turnbull is right on that, but rather spineless on other matters which is why he and his party are totally irrelevant atm)...

Politics. The whole business leaves me with a bitter taste in my mouth, and its not the pleasant beer flavoured bitter that I've come to know and love.

-D

*No I do not go to sex parties with other swinging voters.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
    • Ceste, jak se mas Marek...sorry I only have english keyboard. Are you a fan of Poland's greatest band ever?   
×
×
  • Create New...