Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

would the workshops insurance cover your car Mitch?

it should as there was no waver or anything that had to be signed stating cars are left at owners own risk or anything to that effect ?

gotta wait and hear from either the shop or the police and go from there :P

Great to see ACA just didn't have time to run the drifting story, seems the crazy garbage ladies were more important. but then again by the way it looks the media spin doctors will be at work

i was never expecting a good story about it, i wasnt at all surprised when they opened with the word hoon and pictures of the magill road accident.

just use heavy flow tampons then dave...hahahahahah sorry had too...lol

everyones a comedian... :)

tried car torque ?

nope. dont think theyll have em. national back order. manufacturer ran out of backing plates.

what pads?????we might have something here?? :)

qfm hpx's or a1rm's.

Edited by scandyflick

Only time i leave my car on the street,i leave it to grab my iced coffee inside, come back out, couldnt have been any longer than 30 seconds, and there's an egg splattered over the driver side door and window. GAH!

nope. dont think theyll have em. national back order. manufacturer ran out of backing plates.

qfm hpx's or a1rm's.

Thats F#$#$D up, there the pads i run and i was just about to order some :)

would the workshops insurance cover your car Mitch?

Your car will be covered by them, its their responsibility.

This is why I refuse to leave my car in workshops. Not that I don't trust them ... I don't trust thieves!

Just remember some workshops have one of those lovely little signs, normally hidden in a dark corner that say "vehicles stored and driven at own risk"

Those signs mean diddly-squat.

do the not have good enough security in that workshop or something? being that this is like the second time they have been broken into :)

Well we'll find out soon enough when the CCTV footage is used to apprehend the thieves. If not, then I don't understand why they wouldn't have something like that in place. I have it in my own home, and I'm a simple 8-5 paid worker.

It'll be a case of: fool me once, shame on you. fool me twice, shame on me.

Thats why I don't like leaving my car in someone else's premises ... not when my home security exceeds theirs!

Just remember some workshops have one of those lovely little signs, normally hidden in a dark corner that say "vehicles stored and driven at own risk"
Those signs mean diddly-squat.

CORRECT...........I still laugh everytime I see those signs, you'd think businesses would've learnt by now.

Wooooooooooooooo the Yen just cracked 80 to the A$, and the A$ cracked 84c US. Kinda makes me regret buying the $500 or so of bits I bought for my new car over the last month .... good news is the next few lots of stuff will be at 15% cheaper than the previous bits .... go the A$!

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...