Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i like his work, was going to buy a custom front pipe off nigelswazi that he had made by Andrew but cash didnt allow!

wasnt he selling a moonface mfr or something? i want one of those.

Any time, let him know I pointed him your way :)

geez, only thinkin of yourself eh?

:ninja:

Sadly my small mind agrees with this concept

awesome.

im thinking a career change is in order for me. im pretty good with this financial advice stuff.

i cant seem to send any pm's anyway ruby if you get this can you cancel my membership app with sau-sa if you got the pdf i sent to you by e-mail cheers

ps its fine to drop the timing light off tomorrow night

Edited by R334door(s2)

Anyone know much about valiants? Bay to birdwood is coming this weekend and my grandparents valiant has been sitting in the garage for 3 yrs. Pretty keen to take it out. Any idea what would need replacing before cranking it over?

What oil to use where, and where to buy parts if I need them?

Cheers luke.

I cant agree. Hitler did want to be a champion of the west and that they would accept his ideals of purity and romantic grandiose architecture... britain was at war with germany before he even declared war on russia (historical fact) so I cant see how you'd say his attacking russia would deter british aggression. Hitler would never have wanted to make russia part of germany because he considered the russians as genetically inferior, barbaric people. Aka not enough aryan blood.

Hitler was always after russia, for more territory, more land, for a passage to the sea, farm land, oil etc.. so every german could farm and prosper. He regarded russians in the same ways as jews and slavs. When he lost the battle for the Syberian dessert (could be wrong about the name) as thats where he planned to "migrate" the jews, he wanted to "migrate" them to russia and work them to death. War with the west was of no value untill after conquereing russia. He imagined a showdown with the west but not untill years after it happened. He believed Britian depended heavily on russia and if he smashed russia quickly then Britian would lose that "base", and be forced into a piece settlement.

The russians were better armed and had superior tanks and the AK-47 is still the most reliable weapon, i believe, today. I always thought they just weren't trained well enough. Take Stalingrad room by room, horrific fighting.

I can sort of see similarities between Hitler and Mike Rann...

Evil begets evil; it is said that the end justifies the means, however one cannot admire their means when their ends amount to failure; and double that when the end amounts to success but at the cost of ones own self righteousness

That is just gold.

Anyone know much about valiants? Bay to birdwood is coming this weekend and my grandparents valiant has been sitting in the garage for 3 yrs. Pretty keen

u officially entering? ill be cruising along the path somewhere to check out the cars n chuckle at the kids getting overexcited about a skyline :ninja:

If i get the valiant up and running and learn how to drive it i'll just tag along in it. If not i'll take the 34 for a drive after they have all left and go up for a look.

Haha... is it column shift manual?

Talbo. maybe u dont get wasted enough.

No not these days but I can tell you we raised hell in my younger days playing in bands :ninja:

I cant agree. Hitler did want to be a champion of the west and that they would accept his ideals of purity and romantic grandiose architecture... britain was at war with germany before he even declared war on russia (historical fact) so I cant see how you'd say his attacking russia would deter british aggression. Hitler would never have wanted to make russia part of germany because he considered the russians as genetically inferior, barbaric people. Aka not enough aryan blood.

Hitler was always after russia, for more territory, more land, for a passage to the sea, farm land, oil etc.. so every german could farm and prosper. He regarded russians in the same ways as jews and slavs. When he lost the battle for the Syberian dessert (could be wrong about the name) as thats where he planned to "migrate" the jews, he wanted to "migrate" them to russia and work them to death. War with the west was of no value untill after conquereing russia. He imagined a showdown with the west but not untill years after it happened. He believed Britian depended heavily on russia and if he smashed russia quickly then Britian would lose that "base", and be forced into a piece settlement.

The russians were better armed and had superior tanks and the AK-47 is still the most reliable weapon, i believe, today. I always thought they just weren't trained well enough. Take Stalingrad room by room, horrific fighting.

I can sort of see similarities between Hitler and Mike Rann...

Evil begets evil; it is said that the end justifies the means, however one cannot admire their means when their ends amount to failure; and double that when the end amounts to success but at the cost of ones own self righteousness

That is just gold.

Lebensraum.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...