Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

LPG on a turbo car would be strange.

I wonder how you would tune it

lol @ LPG. Dude do you even know what you're talking about?

it has been done before. and in the case i read allowed for much higher boost levels

One option i have concidered it to do an LPG conversion and then you can have the power and economy. LPG loves high compression and so you vould really boosts it.

Yes you would have to really boost it.....to try and get the power back that 98RON gives you.

If your gonna get gas, get N20.

Edited by KeyMaker
I call lies on this one.

especially the GTiR with a bit done to it.

My S14 had 175rwkw with the usual mods of exhaust, intake, boost and FMIC.

an R33 with the same power can't keep up with them.

GTiR specs:

curb weight - 1220kg

accelleration 0-100kmph - 5.9 seconds

accelleration 0-400m - 13.9 seconds

max power output - 227hp @ 6400rpm (or 171.5 kw)

max torque - approx. 290 nm

R33 GTST specs:

Curb Weight - 1390 Kg

Max. Power; kW/HP 187/250 @ 6400 rpm

Max. Torque 294NM @ 4800 rpm

accelleration 0-100kmph - 6.96 seconds

accelleration 0-400m - 14.30 s

so.. you had stock boost, exhaust and fmic..

he had "a bit of work"

how do you figure you beat a car lighter by 170kg and only making 16kw and 4NM less in standard trim.

same mods done to a GTiR would would tear you a new a-hole.

only way youd win is on a roll from like 120kms onwards..

not that this has anything to do with this thread.

as for this thread.

S14 is better than R32 (with RB20det) on power and fuel.

Looks - R32 GTST is a better looking car than an S14 series 1.

interior on the S14 is better than an R32 GTST

S14 series 2 is better than R32 GTST in any comparison.

Formula goes like this.

R33 S2 > S14A > S14 > R32 > R33 S1

here are my ones..

Stolen S14 with no insurance for the lose

92 R32 GTST

GTiR with 180kwatw would keep up with my 200kw GTR. lol easy..

so a 135kw atw std power iR would own a GTST.. easy..

S14a over all skyline part from R34 or BNR32

it has been done before. and in the case i read allowed for much higher boost levels

The biggest problem with LPG is the agricultural delivery mechanism is quite restrictive as they were designed for low tech low performance engines and haven't had much development since the carby days.

I read an article recently about a new LPG system that didn't restrict airflow as much and they got very good results on an XR6 turbo.

LPG does have a very high octane rating hence the ability to run high compression and high boost - you can usually only realise this benefit by having an LPG only system, although the XR6 turbo mentioned above was dual fuel.

The cost of the decent LPG conversion was pretty expensive though (somewhere between $5K-$10K I think) - it would take a long time to recoup the costs, and is a big % of the cost of the total car.

The old style dual fuel LPG systems would never keep up with a 98RON powered car.

cheers

Mike

I get my R33 down to 10.2L/100km when driving like a granny (don't rev over 3K or hit boost)

Most of the SR20DET's are roughly about the same too, give or take a half a litre.

It sort of defeats the purpose of such engines keeping them off some sort of boost all the time and you may as well just buy a Commodore, Camry or equivalent in vehicular whitegoods and a bowls hat for the rear parcel shelf.

lol

find my old GTiR and run that lol.

i pwned my mates 250kw 265R18 wheeled ECR33 off the line and held him off.. lol. why traction no weight and SR powah. R33 are slow std.

sure, It will loose.

Cool.

thanks for your input.

No Problem. :w00t:

Hey man.. you can't come in here and quote real life experiences.

especially if it's against skylines.

you're going to ruin peoples dreams.

No way a Pulsar hatch can beat a skyline.

Skylines are sports car's y0!

Your so Cool.

I didnt want to bother bringing it up but ok.

stock vs stock, Sure GTiR will win. But only by 0.04 on Q/M. ET.

Few simple Breathing mods. on both cars. The RB25 gets more power per mod than the GTiR. for Example ie. Zaust, Pod, FMIC.

For Example.

GTiR, FMIC, Custom 3" pipework and Blitz BOV, Power FC, Pod, CAI, Exhaust, = 165-175awkw (give or take) @ 16psi Weighting in about 1250kgs. This one on question had 165awkw. possibly low reading dyno?

R33 Gtst, Zaust, Pod, Cai, FMIC, everything else stock. = 180rwkw > 195rwkw (some examples have gotten more just a rought example) Mine actually turned out 194rwkw. @ 11psi Weighing in about 1360kgs.

GTiR -> floggs the GTST off the line, every time, By about 80km's, GTST Passes the GTiR, to win to 160 by about 4 car lengths. Every time.

Tests were done on Private closed controlled Conditions of course :). You seem to believe they are faster than they actually are.

Edited by silverbulletR33

Oh yea, and the GTiR had Lightweight Volk Wheels too.

Dont get me wrong, I love the little GTiR, I have had the pleasure of driving the one mentioned above, and even got to race it a few times, do a few launches. Great little cars And they launch Insanely hard. Around a track though, Im pretty sure the GTiR would've killed me :w00t:

i'd take an S14a over any R32 or R33 gtst

although i believe an R32 can look nice with a GTR front, i love hte look of hte S14a any day

the R33 is the (very) ugly duckling of the skyline family, i would stay away

the only issue with the S14 is that interior-wise its fairly plain, unlike the skylines

my 2c? well my 2c if really only worth 1c but i'll give it anyway..

...get an S14a

you can get just as much power from lpg if you tune it right.

you need more timing advance and computer can take car of that and with the right installation you have a sub computer to control the lpg flowrate.

as i said before lpg loves high compression (19:1) so it would work really well with hight boost.

Also they can do lpg multi point injection now & it costs $4000

Edited by megabuff

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...