Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have no experience with the engine VR38DETT to you that expectation proved largely true! !

Despite the dramatic difference in STROKER! !

But in terms of the experience of the RB20DET and RB25DET and RB26DETT is better in all respects use or promotion or maintenance or endurance is much better too! ! !

There is no engine V6 6 Slander advantage proved successful only relatively Tourqu be a little better and I say this advantage! ! !

But respects mentioned above inline much better health and days will prove myself! ! Despite the size difference stroker !!!!!!!

NOTE: inline engine only for the 6 slander !! V ENGINE GOOD ON THE V8 ONLY !! OR MORE!!!

Dude, you made my head hurt with that :thumbsup: ... stop using google translation to translate from whatever language you first typed that in.

  • Replies 266
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Nope.. clearly remeber it running somwhere in the 10's

close, found this on the web,

- The Z-tune ran 0-400 meters (a little shorter than a quarter mile) in 10.06 seconds during development.

- NISMO claims a Z-Tune will crush through a quarter-mile in just 10.6 seconds on street tires. That would make it the hardest

accelerating "production" car ever.

whoa bkc :whistling: .... thought id start posting and here would be a good place to start. i am with 90% of the others on here. rb26 is a good motor but its like 20yrs old now. iron block too. not too mention the lack of varible valve. sure modders hate it but it is actully a good thing if u can figure it out...and we all no of the rb26s oil problem. now the vr38 is a brand new motor, all alloy, titianum, alloy and magnesium parts = way superior.

and everyone is up in arms bout the manifold and the turbos being 1 peice, harden up girlscouts. everyone replced mainfolds anyway. the gtr's bay is probly wide enough that turbo replacing can be done from underneath rather then removing the motor 300zx style....not to mention tht intake manifold, pure sex

and the argument of sound? well the rb does sound nice, but the sound a well piped v6 can make is enough to make ur pants tighter.

finally, its a supercar, stop hating and start admiring, can you and will you ever be able to afford one? if so buy it and then tell us how bad it is and then give it to me coz i wont complain

/rant

whoa bkc :D .... thought id start posting and here would be a good place to start. i am with 90% of the others on here. rb26 is a good motor but its like 20yrs old now. iron block too. not too mention the lack of varible valve. sure modders hate it but it is actully a good thing if u can figure it out...and we all no of the rb26s oil problem. now the vr38 is a brand new motor, all alloy, titianum, alloy and magnesium parts = way superior.

and everyone is up in arms bout the manifold and the turbos being 1 peice, harden up girlscouts. everyone replced mainfolds anyway. the gtr's bay is probly wide enough that turbo replacing can be done from underneath rather then removing the motor 300zx style....not to mention tht intake manifold, pure sex

and the argument of sound? well the rb does sound nice, but the sound a well piped v6 can make is enough to make ur pants tighter.

finally, its a supercar, stop hating and start admiring, can you and will you ever be able to afford one? if so buy it and then tell us how bad it is and then give it to me coz i wont complain

/rant

Well said

whoa bkc >_< .... thought id start posting and here would be a good place to start. i am with 90% of the others on here. rb26 is a good motor but its like 20yrs old now. iron block too. not too mention the lack of varible valve. sure modders hate it but it is actully a good thing if u can figure it out...and we all no of the rb26s oil problem. now the vr38 is a brand new motor, all alloy, titianum, alloy and magnesium parts = way superior.

and everyone is up in arms bout the manifold and the turbos being 1 peice, harden up girlscouts. everyone replced mainfolds anyway. the gtr's bay is probly wide enough that turbo replacing can be done from underneath rather then removing the motor 300zx style....not to mention tht intake manifold, pure sex

and the argument of sound? well the rb does sound nice, but the sound a well piped v6 can make is enough to make ur pants tighter.

finally, its a supercar, stop hating and start admiring, can you and will you ever be able to afford one? if so buy it and then tell us how bad it is and then give it to me coz i wont complain

/rant

Thank you for your reply .

General information is correct FOR RB26DETT !

EXAMPLE : GTR34 Z TUNE !! BETTER THAN NEW GTR35 ENGINE !! 2.8DETT !! I

THINK SAME TWIN TURBO iHi !! I am not sure from the twin turbo same it or not !!

!(((the less time best)))! :yes: (( 0-100km)) etc . !!!!

Thanks ALL .

Edited by bkc
Thank you for your reply .

General information is correct FOR RB26DETT !

EXAMPLE : GTR34 Z TUNE !! BETTER THAN NEW GTR35 ENGINE !! 2.8DETT !! I

THINK SAME TWIN TURBO iHi !! I am not sure from the twin turbo same it or not !!

!(((the less time best)))! :P (( 0-100km)) etc . !!!!

Thanks ALL .

Your a fking idiout, someone ban this guy or atleast close the thread.

You should have to have some understanding of the english language before posting

just out of curiousity, would what a z-tune cost? now compare that to the new gtr. also take into consideration that if the z-tune is running a race engine then it isn't going to take that kindly to sitting in traffic and driving down to the shops on a cold morning to get some milk. the vr38 is a high performance engine that can be used in everyday situations. also they r35 probably rides better on rough roads than the z-tune. and finally, as far as life of the engine goes, i'd say that the z-tunes motor would wear out quicker than the vr38. yes it has race internals, but they generally aren't designed to still be putting out full power after 100,000kms.

and i thought the vr38 had been developed with the help of cosworth.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
    • It's amazing how well the works on the leather seats. Looks mint. Looking forward to see how you go with the wheels. They do suit the car! Gutter rash is easy to fix, but I'm curious about getting the colour done.
×
×
  • Create New...