Jump to content
SAU Community

New Signature Size Restrictions

funkymonkey
 Share

Recommended Posts

funkymonkey Grand Master

funkymonkey

Posted
Posted

Some of you may be wondering why some of the sigs on the forums look weird today. This is because a new signature size restriction has been put in place. It combines the text and images and restricts it to a 550 pixel x 150 pixel space.

It seems many sigs are in excess of this size, and may appear cropped. You actual signatures haven't been altered, only the viewable area itself that's allocated to them has been restricted.

I'll be accepting feedback in this thread, positive and negative, and review the restriction shortly.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/193193-new-signature-size-restrictions/
Share on other sites
  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Beer Baron Grand Master

Beer Baron

Posted
Posted

the size of my posts is dermined by all the crap on the side (ie Avatar, user bars, name, location, cars etc). :P

which reminds me shan, which one of my group memberships is causing the 'group icon' tag to display?

funkymonkey Grand Master

funkymonkey

Posted
  • Author
Posted

NSW moderator Icon... you and Bobeh seem to have it. Thought the group was removed?

Yeah Ash, as Rich said, his side panel is longer than his post content including the sig. I get that on mine as well... Maybe we should look at reducing teh stuff on the side too.

R31Nismoid Grand Master

R31Nismoid

Posted
Posted

Yeah, we should drop the stuff on the side a bit then.

Maybe character limit on the field sizes or something?

No point having sig's restricted if people still take up half a page due to the side-bar :P

d00dz Grand Master

d00dz

Posted
Posted
Yeah, we should drop the stuff on the side a bit then.

Maybe character limit on the field sizes or something?

No point having sig's restricted if people still take up half a page due to the side-bar :P

haha like most of the mods lol.

Nah Im just saying some people's signatures and av's are like 100-500k's. (Animated gifs etc) and the net here at work is slow to load em.

Doesnt matter in most places as I have that firefox ad blocker.. but yea... :D

Beer Baron Grand Master

Beer Baron

Posted
Posted
NSW moderator Icon... you and Bobeh seem to have it. Thought the group was removed?

Yeah Ash, as Rich said, his side panel is longer than his post content including the sig. I get that on mine as well... Maybe we should look at reducing teh stuff on the side too.

well it's only really evident when we have 1 or 2 line posts. obviously with a normal length post like this one it's not an issue. where as sigs are always an issue, even if you have a 1 page long post you still get a massive sig at the end of it.

see

see

seeeeee!

R31Nismoid Grand Master

R31Nismoid

Posted
Posted

Well yeah - your sig is massive mate even compared to Sams

I agree with Victor aswell, we need to impose a file/pic size limit as some people i've removed in the past have had 2mg .GIF's and it just slams the page if you try and load it.

With the "TAG" thing Rich - see Admin section.

Ive been asking for input for months from you NSW people so i can destroy that "invalid tag" problem by fixing the group list of mods to a 'better' way of doing it all. :angry:

Ive done Vic earlier this year, and NSW needs some attention too... i just need guideance

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Borci88
      Borg Warner EFR Series Turbo's V 2.0

      By Borci88 · Posted

      Not a problem at all Lithium, I appreciate your help regardless. I've pulled a small part of a log where the target pressure was 28psi and it spiked to 36.4psi. I've only just begun using Data Log Viewer so if I'm sending this in the wrong format let me know.
    • Lithium
      Borg Warner EFR Series Turbo's V 2.0

      By Lithium · Posted

      Sorry had a bit of a week and haven't had heaps of time to follow this, so apologies if I've missed something - any chance of showing a log with the rpm, turbo speed, MAP, and wgdc all in one view? Definitely an "interesting" problem, and while it's definitely worth noting that there was a similar issue with the twins I'd not completely put all bets on the root cause being the same thing.  Keep an open mind, follow the data.
    • Borci88
      Borg Warner EFR Series Turbo's V 2.0

      By Borci88 · Posted

      I built this engine approximately 12 years ago so my own head (brain) is a little grey on the exact hardware in the RB head, however what I recall is. Stock RB25 NEO TURBO Intake Camshaft HKS 260 degree Exhaust Camshaft (R34 GTR) RB25 NEO Turbo Springs  I ported/removed the exhaust stud humps found in the RB25 head so theres less turbulence but it wasn't ported/polished properly, just a hump removal. I've attached two pictures of the before and after to illustrate.     The ECU gets its boost reference from the nipple on the rear of the head on the intake side, behind the fuel rail. The wastegate gets its boost reference from a nipple on the cooler pipe immediately after the comp cover.  Could a decent pressure drop across the intercooler cause the wastegate to be seeing a higher PSI than what the ECU is seeing, and thus it can't control it accurately and quick enough?   We ran a line to the actuator and watched it open and close using an air compressor, while we didn't have a gauge on the line to see when it was cracking open, it was opening smoothly.  I just removed the gate now and even though the documentation says you need to open it in a vice due to preload (which I did), there wasn't any preload on the cap, which is something we noticed straight out of the box as well when new. This silver cap internally is threaded to the actuator rod that runs out the bottom of the straightgate. Not sure how I'm supposed to get this spring out to be frank.. Potentially but everyone else doesn't appear to have to stop at 500kw because of 6boosts design.  I would, but I think I'm getting to that point where if I'm going to do the head and make another 100kw, then I'm going to need a fancy gearbox and quite a few other things and 10k becomes 20k becomes 30k within a few months. I'm not necessarily sold on the idea just yet that the head is restrictive at 4000rpm (and what.. 300kw?) and yet doesn't seem to be restrictive at 7000rpm when it's making 500kw, however I'm obviously not closing the door on that theory.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      Yeah - Half the problem is I know this sensor actually goes to 150C.. I'm pretty certain it is min of 11C. So still more data required I suppose. It's really quite hard to get the oil temp to 100+ then immediately pull over and take a reading before the temp drops. Annoyingly I suppose the range I really 'want' is likely 80 -> 120C. TBH the ecu can't really *do* anything with it, and the gauge itself is very visible... ...but you know how it is.
    • The Mafia
      Borg Warner EFR Series Turbo's V 2.0

      By The Mafia · Posted

      My EFR 8474 Black, made 800awhp on a roller dyno. at 25-26psi. E85. Shaft speed was around 106,000rpm 1.01 rear. The rear is maxed.  6 boost Turbosmart 60mm gate 3.5inch exhaust  Head is worked to the shithouse. Bain racing. VCam. 272 exhaust. RB28 - RB26 foundation.  You have an intake issue. Start getting proper data and I mean go back to the simple things.  - Pressure test your intake - Block off the Turbo BOV, you don't need it.  - Test pressure before and after your intercooler If your head is pretty stock, that is your issue. Especially if it is NA.  Take it off and spend $10k on it. 
×
×
  • Create New...