Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Some of you may be wondering why some of the sigs on the forums look weird today. This is because a new signature size restriction has been put in place. It combines the text and images and restricts it to a 550 pixel x 150 pixel space.

It seems many sigs are in excess of this size, and may appear cropped. You actual signatures haven't been altered, only the viewable area itself that's allocated to them has been restricted.

I'll be accepting feedback in this thread, positive and negative, and review the restriction shortly.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/193193-new-signature-size-restrictions/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

the size of my posts is dermined by all the crap on the side (ie Avatar, user bars, name, location, cars etc). :P

which reminds me shan, which one of my group memberships is causing the 'group icon' tag to display?

NSW moderator Icon... you and Bobeh seem to have it. Thought the group was removed?

Yeah Ash, as Rich said, his side panel is longer than his post content including the sig. I get that on mine as well... Maybe we should look at reducing teh stuff on the side too.

Yeah, we should drop the stuff on the side a bit then.

Maybe character limit on the field sizes or something?

No point having sig's restricted if people still take up half a page due to the side-bar :P

Yeah, we should drop the stuff on the side a bit then.

Maybe character limit on the field sizes or something?

No point having sig's restricted if people still take up half a page due to the side-bar :P

haha like most of the mods lol.

Nah Im just saying some people's signatures and av's are like 100-500k's. (Animated gifs etc) and the net here at work is slow to load em.

Doesnt matter in most places as I have that firefox ad blocker.. but yea... :D

NSW moderator Icon... you and Bobeh seem to have it. Thought the group was removed?

Yeah Ash, as Rich said, his side panel is longer than his post content including the sig. I get that on mine as well... Maybe we should look at reducing teh stuff on the side too.

well it's only really evident when we have 1 or 2 line posts. obviously with a normal length post like this one it's not an issue. where as sigs are always an issue, even if you have a 1 page long post you still get a massive sig at the end of it.

see

see

seeeeee!

Well yeah - your sig is massive mate even compared to Sams

I agree with Victor aswell, we need to impose a file/pic size limit as some people i've removed in the past have had 2mg .GIF's and it just slams the page if you try and load it.

With the "TAG" thing Rich - see Admin section.

Ive been asking for input for months from you NSW people so i can destroy that "invalid tag" problem by fixing the group list of mods to a 'better' way of doing it all. :angry:

Ive done Vic earlier this year, and NSW needs some attention too... i just need guideance

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey guys, I’m a veteran detailer with years of hands-on experience. I’ll be sharing quick, effective detailing tips to help you keep your Skyline (or any ride) looking its best. Got a question? Fire away!
    • I guess when I say it's a POS I mean.. the solution and the stuff has the capacity for maybe... 1 spot. You know, as a spot cleaner. What I really *want* is the ability to do an entire car, all upholstery, all carpet, mats, all seats, door card inserts, A pillars, roof liners, etc. In one go. I get lured by all the jank that comes out and think "I'd like to be able to clean to that degree"
    • I've got one (not the car one, the domestic spot cleaner one, which is basically the same jobbie) and have driven it hard for hours and hours at a time. Grimy sofas, 6' floor rugs, etc. I'd blame your specific example rather than the whole category. I haven't used mine in the car, because.... you know, it's my car. So there is no-one else's ball sweat in the driver's seat, there's no kid food/drink spills or hand prints inside because they've never had an opportunity to put them there. You know, basic, standard Skyline rules.
    • I normally run with I think a 10mm, and definitely use the second handle you can add to a drill. They hurt when they bins up!   For the crush tube, once all subframe is clear, I'd try some stilsons and see if I can get it to start to twist.
    • Probably because they couldn't, because the use of the variable resistor to create a "signal" in the ECU is managed by the ECU's circuitry. The only way that VDO could do it would be if they made a "smart" sensor that directly created the 0-5V signal itself. And that takes us back to the beginning. Well, in that case, you could do the crude digital (ie, binary, on or off) input that I mentioned before, to at least put a marker on the trace. If you pressed the button only at a series of known integer temperatures, say every 2°C from the start of your range of interest up to whatever you can manage, and you know what temperature the first press was at, then you'd have the voltage marked for all of those temperatures. And you can have more than one shot at it too. You can set the car up to get the oil hot (bypass oil coolers, mask off the air flow to oil coolers, and/or the radiator, to get the whole engine a bit hotter, then give it a bit of curry to get some measurements up near the top of the range.   On the subject of the formula for the data you provided, I did something different to Matt's approach, and got a slightly different linear formula, being Temp = -22.45*V + 118.32. Just a curve fit from Excel using all the points, instead of just throwing it through 2 points. A little more accurate, but not drastically different. Rsquared is only 0.9955 though, which is good but not great. If you could use higher order polynomials in the thingo, then a quadratic fit gives an excellent Rsquared of 0.9994. Temp = 2.1059*V^2 - 34.13*V + 133.27. The funny thing is, though, that I'd probably trust the linear fit more for extrapolation beyond the provided data. The quadratic might get a bit squirrely. Hang on, I'll use the formulae to extend the plots.... It's really big so you can see all the lines. I might have to say that I think I really still prefer the quadratic fit. It looks like the linear fit overstates the temperature in the middle of the input range, and would pretty solidly understate what the likely shape of the real curve would say at both ends.
×
×
  • Create New...