Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Some of you may be wondering why some of the sigs on the forums look weird today. This is because a new signature size restriction has been put in place. It combines the text and images and restricts it to a 550 pixel x 150 pixel space.

It seems many sigs are in excess of this size, and may appear cropped. You actual signatures haven't been altered, only the viewable area itself that's allocated to them has been restricted.

I'll be accepting feedback in this thread, positive and negative, and review the restriction shortly.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/193193-new-signature-size-restrictions/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

the size of my posts is dermined by all the crap on the side (ie Avatar, user bars, name, location, cars etc). :P

which reminds me shan, which one of my group memberships is causing the 'group icon' tag to display?

NSW moderator Icon... you and Bobeh seem to have it. Thought the group was removed?

Yeah Ash, as Rich said, his side panel is longer than his post content including the sig. I get that on mine as well... Maybe we should look at reducing teh stuff on the side too.

Yeah, we should drop the stuff on the side a bit then.

Maybe character limit on the field sizes or something?

No point having sig's restricted if people still take up half a page due to the side-bar :P

Yeah, we should drop the stuff on the side a bit then.

Maybe character limit on the field sizes or something?

No point having sig's restricted if people still take up half a page due to the side-bar :P

haha like most of the mods lol.

Nah Im just saying some people's signatures and av's are like 100-500k's. (Animated gifs etc) and the net here at work is slow to load em.

Doesnt matter in most places as I have that firefox ad blocker.. but yea... :D

NSW moderator Icon... you and Bobeh seem to have it. Thought the group was removed?

Yeah Ash, as Rich said, his side panel is longer than his post content including the sig. I get that on mine as well... Maybe we should look at reducing teh stuff on the side too.

well it's only really evident when we have 1 or 2 line posts. obviously with a normal length post like this one it's not an issue. where as sigs are always an issue, even if you have a 1 page long post you still get a massive sig at the end of it.

see

see

seeeeee!

Well yeah - your sig is massive mate even compared to Sams

I agree with Victor aswell, we need to impose a file/pic size limit as some people i've removed in the past have had 2mg .GIF's and it just slams the page if you try and load it.

With the "TAG" thing Rich - see Admin section.

Ive been asking for input for months from you NSW people so i can destroy that "invalid tag" problem by fixing the group list of mods to a 'better' way of doing it all. :angry:

Ive done Vic earlier this year, and NSW needs some attention too... i just need guideance

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It might be worth having a good look at the chassis behind the bumper then; most people prefer the series 2 look so it might have been changed to cheaper parts as part of an earlier repair
    • The car itself a series 2. I was just curious about the headlights and just wanted to confirm that they were series 1. Good to know the rest of the front end is series 1. It’ll be easier for me to find parts on the aftermarket side of things lol
    • If you've wired up the coils & injectors properly, & have the neo CAS loom for the trigger, it should all work. The VCT works the same way so just different plugs between s1 & neo. Assuming DBW if no IAC. Don't bother with the stock boost solenoid with g4x.
    • THERE IS NO IAT SENSOR ON ANY SINGLE TURBO RB. And the one on an RB26 is not for "engine control" - it's really too big and too slow and is only used for over-temp alarming (as far as I can tell). Anyway, you don't have one. You want/need one for the Link, then you need to buy one, find a spot for it, and wire it in. You do know that the stock boost solenoid is not capable of "control", right? It is merely on or off, for the low boost (5 psi) and high boost (7psi), which the ECU enforces mostly based on gear. The stock solenoid is not for PWM control and is not plumbed up in a way to provide it. If you want to control boost properly, then you need a proper MAC valve. And yes, you can wire either of them direct to the ECU. Well, I assume you can - I don't know what the boost solenoid pins on the plug and play Link are capable of. They really should be as capable as any normal Link - but seeing as it is plg and play, it might be limited to stock functionality. Read the doco.   You really do just want to plug stuff together without understanding how it works, right? I can't help you there. I don't know the plug types or pinning on half the stuff you're asking about. If I had to do it I would sit down with the wiring diagrams, the car/looms and a multimeter and work out what is what.
    • Light should be a pressure switch, not a sensor.
×
×
  • Create New...