Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all, i was wondering what the best route for converting the look of your R34 GT -GTT to a "wider" more R34 GTR look is...

I dont know where to find the GTR hood and the hinges for it to bolt on to the GT frame and where to find the rear wider fenders. I know of Uras rear widening fenders but they are more squarish and i dont really want to by them and reshape them myself, cause quite frankly i dont know how or who does that, and i am aware that they sell the front widening fenders and the front lip, i was curious as i have seen some coversions around and they look convicingly good.

What i really want to know is where to find the GTR hoods, it doesnt have to be A stock GTR hood it can be a TS hood or a CW just anything that is shorter than the GT hood, and more importantly the hinges that go with them respectively. So far i have done nothing to my R34 GT but hopefully when im done i can then work on performance mods and the like.

If you dont know where to get them or find them can people even just give me a list of body shops that have clean kits for R34's (2 Door) cause my stock 34 isnt cuting it for me at all. :) Much appreciated thanks to anyone who answers in advance...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/193903-gtr-conversion-for-r34-gt-gtt/
Share on other sites

one guy on here did the actual GTR conversion, think it cost him like 20 grand or more, might have been closer to 30. just go for an aftermarket widebody kit, although there isnt much around for the 34 GTt

mate of mine is going this route in his 34 soon but for the life of me cant remember what kit hes getting. shouldnt be too hard to source a GTR style bonnet, hinges would probly be the main issue. look at bodykit places like jetspeed etc for bonnet.

Edited by VB-

hey mate, first off. get the gtr conversion parts (gtr bonnet, gtr front bar, gtr front gaurds) from eastbear. they make an actual conversion kit for gt's that fit directly on. and with the gaurds. you'd either have to find a written off one, or get new ones from nissan. but alot of money is needed, so be ready. or just go to a good fibreglasser and get custom rear gaurds made up which frankly is better so you can have something different to any other skyline. let us know how it goes mate. cheers.

Thanks guys thats much appreciated. I think i can probably get the hinges from Nissan itself if thats possible, and ill look around for sure i have more areas to do my homework on so ill let you know when im done with it all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...