Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Is it just me, or do the designers at Nissan seem to just use a basic car template and change a few little things to call it a new car?

eg, S13 and R32's have quite a similar silohuette, as do R33's and series one S14's (look at the roofline and the nose). And the more i look at the new GTR, the more i start to notice cues from the 350Z.

Edited by baron25
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/194435-are-nissans-designers-a-bit-lazy/
Share on other sites

its great for them - saves on manufacturing of parts

its great for us - makes for relatively cheap upgrades if you don't have the top of hte line model..

baron25 - you sound quite ciritcal of one of hte oldest tricks in the book..

i notice you have an R33GTS25, just remember that without the R33GTS25t and GTR there wouldn't be exhaust upgrades, brake upgrades, bumper upgrades, spoiler upgrades etc that are bolt on from the upper spec models.

personally i love that my V35 looks very similar to the Z33 350z and upcoming R35 GTR

Edited by WazR32GTSt

All car companies do this. Look at Holden for example, the VT and VX commodore are the same thing with the change of head and tail lights. People still buy the cars so they continue making little changes.

Evolutions of the same model I concede do look similar, and for reasons i assume of 'not broken don't fix it'.

But the point I was trying to make is surely it can't be that difficult to come out with a new design, auto shows are filled with new concept cars each month, some of which look quite impressive indeed. Why do these designs get shelved, and what's put out look like something that already exists. If you dislike the styling of one model, and all the others resemble it, it kinda switches you off an entire brand, regardless of what model you wanted.

It's a bit of a cop out to produce a car, then push and pull the panels a little, change the name and call it a completely different new car.

All of the car companies do it. It's called branding.

BINGO :(

All automitive manufactures have there own unique design language which consists of certain characteristics that are common accross all models in their brand. This ultimately mean most if not all models will have very similar design ques.

Just the way it is i'm afraid.

Edited by rdub_32gtst
so how did the subaru vortex fit into this "branding" :(

The odd concept with a radical design does come every so often...

The success of these designs then influence said companys design language and future models may/will draw from its design

Edited by rdub_32gtst

omg, what a revelation! someone call the press!

as has been said, every manufacturer has a style that is significant, or unique to them.

styling cues that identify a subabishisan as a subabishisan tend to carry through whole model families, if not the whole show room.

and sure the concept cars look great, but they have to build something that is feasible, marketable, and recognisable as a subabishisan. if subabishsan went from being boxy and a aggressive to soft and round like their korean competitors, no ones going to buy it, the fans of the subabishisan will be put off by this sudden change, potential buyers could simply buy the korean competitor and buy their mistress a new kinky outfit, and the hardcore might even switch to another brand.

change in a brand is good, overtime you modify the design of the car, tweak this line a littler higher, make the headlights a little softer, gauge reaction and go from there, make it more appealing to the prospective customers.

blah, its 2 am, probably doesnt make much in the way of sense. meh.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
×
×
  • Create New...