Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just do it, I mean shit if youve pump that much money into the engine hows it going to hurt when your bottom end or head gasket blows and you just have to wack in a forged bottom end. I mean after all its only a couple of grand and a bigger turbo is going to make you smile for along time.

But I dont really think 300rwkw is useful on the street anyway apart from drinking fuel

Edited by DECIM8

298rwkw on creatd dyno.

gt3040 turbo, 18psi, tomei cams and head gasket. stock bottom end

last 2 1/2 years so far on the limiter most of the time. done a aheap of track days.

Its all in the tune

presonally i think youd be running a huge risk of engine failure anything over 260rwk. anything over is just a waiting game :)

And what hard info are you basing this off of? Repeating what you hear on the internet doesn't count.

no mate im not an internet mechanic like you pal. first hand from experience and having friends who OWN a performance shop and dyno tune every day tell me these answers. its only an average btw.

that and i have been modifying my r33 fror the last 2 years :)

LOL, internet mechanic, eh? I've owned my R32 for about 4 years now (not that that proves anything) and have had it up above 400rwhp for as long as you've "been modifying your r33", so take that for what it's worth in the reliability debate. I don't feel the need to go into my friends and them "OWNING" a performance shop, me driving for them when the street tune (3 RB25's over 400rwhp in the past couple months) , helping wrench, oh, and them laughing at all the people that think RB25's will magicaly blow up over 400rwhp. That proves nothing. BTW, the shop owner has a stock bottom end in his RB25 with a built head that made over 600hp. "that's only an average btw"? What? Your not making sense.

I'm asking if you have seen an RB25 blow up, seen one sitting in the shop getting fixed, or heard actuall detailed "this is what broke for this reason" stories. I'm talking like "the block split" or "thing ringlands cracked" or "he lifted the head and blew the gasket which trashed the motor" kinda stuff. Your friends telling you RB25's aren't reliable over X amount of HP because they said so and they own a shop so it must be true doesn't fly with me.

I'm not trying to turn this thread into a "post count measuring contest" :) which it seems all these threads about what RB25's can make always turns into, I'm just trying to get hard evidence either way. So far I've seen numerous people posting up that they have been making 400+rwhp for years on stock RB25's, and not one person saying "I blew my RB25 up". I'm sure there are plenty of people who have blown them up, but I'm willing to bet most of them just had crappy tunes, not enough fueling, etc and had nothing to do with them breaking just because of HP.

Edited by Cjmartz2k

(just re-read the first page) im just a little skeptical that the old shitter T04e would rack out 400rwhp… especially dropping to .9 bar

I had one of the largest variants in a .82A/R rear (and a few people i know had similar turbo specs years ago) and it was no more than 240rwkw at best with 13-14psi, and best mph of 112-113

I mean, if you have a fairly mighty MPH around the 120+, then fair enough.

Not trying to take the thread further off course, I just find 60rwkw a bit much to take for identical setups bar ECU. That could be one reason your motor is together :P

Anyways, when you see the RB26's fail with say, what, 350rwkw doing circuit work. RB25's go down the near enough same road.

As an example, you could make 350rwkw and run it daily as a street car, but fact of the matter is your never going to see much past 120km/h for longer than a second or two… And the motor is hardly going to see 350rwkw on a daily basis now is it?

People saying that’s the case are kidding themselves. Also remember motors running like this are under nowhere near the stress that a motor doing weekend track work would see with regular expeditions into the 200km/h+ zone and sitting well up in the RPM scale at the same time, for a long time.

I reckon you probably could have a motor crank out 350rwkw. But would it be reliable? Depends on the situation and most likely not forever.

Max power and reliable power are different.

If a motor can run 350rwkw for 5+ years…and by that I mean seeing 350rwkw daily on a factory bottom end, I'd be surprised.

Point taken, street cars arnt driven hard enough..

Lets get the govenment to make a Autobahn

Onto another point if you want a Reliable engine, leave it stock .. better yet give it to Nissan OZ to de-tune it, they seem to have this under wraps

Edited by DECIM8

Well put about the track vs. street car, and it's something to consider. I daily drive the car, and it only sees 4th gear pulls or better 1 or 2 nights a week drag racing, and than only 7-8 runs a night. No extended autocrossing or drifting. Also, like I said, I'm more willing to push my motor because I have access to $300 replacements. If it lasts 2 years, I'm happy.

The 400rwhp was on a dyno. Now, it was a dynojet style dyno, so I'll give you the fact maybe it will read higher than some. I am at sea level (literaly), so that helps. Also, the tune had pretty agressive timing maps on a stock 9:1 compression with 12.1 a/f ratios. It was set to 1.2-1.3 bar, and falling down to .9-1.0 bar around 7.5k-8k rpm. It was the big T04e with a .82 a/r ex housing also BTW.

Whether or not I was making 400rwhp or not on the T04e or not (if not, it was damn close), I certainly am making a lot more than that now. The DSM (Diamond Star Motors--a mistubishi/chrysler colaboration) guys are making 600awhp on my current turbo. I've been on that one for over 1 year making a best guess of right at 500rwhp (120+mph trap speeds, and maxing out a z32 MAF). That previous dyno doesn't have anybody to run it anymore, so I can't get on there.

my RB25 failed yesterday @ 390rwhp (18psi)through a built auto with stall...

i dont think that was the problem though, i think it was more my mistake ... i let a few things go and i shouldnt have which has probably cost me but oh well its just an excuse to do a rebuild. Peace of mind lol

my first motor with forged pistons spat a rod out @ 450rwhp, ive still got the top of the piston with half a conrod attached to it.

That doesn't sound like a to much hp problem to me. Especially it being forged parts.

  • 3 weeks later...
Mine's still kicking just fine. No dyno sheet, but it's right at 500rwhp judging by the 5v's on the Z32 and 120mph trap speeds.
making a best guess of right at 500rwhp (120+mph trap speeds, and maxing out a z32 MAF).

Sorry I missed this post before. How on earth is 120mph in a Skyline anything like 500rwhp? Surely you're running high 120's (128+) to claim that horsepower?!? My car ran 120mph on many occasions with just 355rwhp. (3310lb R33 GTST)

  • 2 weeks later...

Does anybody have a recommendation to the order which to replace parts to reach 375-385 wkw?

Rods being the first to go, pistons next, etc etc ?

Trying to decide if I should build my motor first before installing or putting it in and building it up later. Right now it is fine but all stock.

Also considering a Greddy (or similar intake). Car is an S14 for Time Attack.

Pistons would be what I would replace first.

2rismo--what are you talking about? Low 120's is just fine for 500rwhp. I will say the mph is on a gtech, so it might not be all that acurate, but still, 120's is 500rwhp territory. I might be HIGH 400's at the wheels, but that's not enough of a difference to try and say somebody is full of it over. Keep in mind, I'm spinning WAY past the 60' with 275 nitto's on these crappy Okinawa roads, and I'm not as light as you think with subs, full interior, my fat but, tools, etc. Traction can actually effect mph when you are spinning as much as me.

Also, there is such a wide varience of mph to hp for turbo cars, it's tough to say what's what. Look on dragtimes.com. There is a timeslip which I'm guessing is you that matches your times and car, and then there is another R33 making 603rwhp ripping off a 10.6@128mph (with a 1.5 60' mind you--I tick off 2.1's on nitto's here because of the roads and not track). There is also a GTR with a TO4R @ 22psi that doesn't have a dyno, but that's easy 600rwhp and he's doing 10.7@130mph.

So in summary, I'm at least high 400's rwhp, and as it pertains to this thread, RB25's can handle a lot more than a lot of people around here give them credit for.

Edited by Cjmartz2k
2rismo--what are you talking about? Low 120's is just fine for 500rwhp.

No. No it's not. It's way off - try 100hp or so.

I will say the mph is on a gtech, so it might not be all that acurate,

LOL @ GTech. Timeslips don't lie.

but still, 120's is 500rwhp territory.

Nope. Sorry.

I might be HIGH 400's at the wheels, but that's not enough of a difference to try and say somebody is full of it over.

100hp might not be a big variation if you're making 1500hp but comparing 400rwhp to 500rwhp is an overestimation of about 25%. I stand by my statement.

Keep in mind, I'm spinning WAY past the 60' with 275 nitto's on these crappy Okinawa roads, and I'm not as light as you think with subs, full interior, my fat but, tools, etc. Traction can actually effect mph when you are spinning as much as me.

Traction, even with your excuse-o-meter pinging as hard as it is, wont account for the over-estimation of your hp. Wheelspin very infrequently affects terminal speed.

Also, there is such a wide varience of mph to hp for turbo cars, it's tough to say what's what.

No there isn't.

Look on dragtimes.com. There is a timeslip which I'm guessing is you that matches your times and car, and then there is another R33 making 603rwhp ripping off a 10.6@128mph (with a 1.5 60' mind you--I tick off 2.1's on nitto's here because of the roads and not track). There is also a GTR with a TO4R @ 22psi that doesn't have a dyno, but that's easy 600rwhp and he's doing 10.7@130mph.

Mate, the very best advice you can take from my post is that MPH doesn't lie and that the time shown on a timeslip shouldn't be used to calculate power.

So in summary, I'm at least high 400's rwhp, and as it pertains to this thread, RB25's can handle a lot more than a lot of people around here give them credit for.

Nope.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There is a way, but it's not with the same cars. You need to find the same vintage of car, that we had. Realistically, that was an affordable car with aftermarket parts around. So what people need to find is a car that had a decent base in its day, and can be modified. They're looking for a car year make of 2010 to 2015 really... Aus could have done it if Holden didn't fold as V8 commodores were cheap, and if Ford didn't get expensive thanks to COVID, then you could cheaply play with FG Barras. Realistically, those are just a bit heavier, four door skylines. I'm sure the US and UK have similar cars they could find.
    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
×
×
  • Create New...